^^^ You need to change that to "If" it hits cold air.
For example: It is warm here with a moist NW flow. That helps up high for the skiing some but it won't get us through a fire season. We need that 6500-8000K snow pack.
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
Are you talking about Carolina?
I’m not promoting snow making and I don’t really like skiing man made snow. The reality is before Mission Ridge expanded snow making they would often have to wait for natural snow in December to open. Now they can open reliably by the day after Thanksgiving. The snow season has shifted to later snow in the spring. Remember we’re talking about a hill that usually receives less than 200” of snow.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I know Minnesota now needs a lot more manmade to remail viable. The outdoor hockey rec leagues there and other northern states have been migrating to indoor rinks since the mid 80s. The impact of climate change is clearly visible if you look Pond skating is pretty much a thing of the past in places where it was a staple back in the 70s and 80s.
Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!
Look, I’m not a climate change denier. It’s happening and it’s affecting skiing in different ways. I don’t think I will see that much change or the end of skiing in my lifetime.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Yabbut ...... your 97.
His 97 what?….
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
It’s my 97!
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
97 years old ..... almost as old as me. Not much climate change in the remains minutes of life?
You youngsters are a bit slow.
.
Is there a thread on The pacific NW? I’m starting to see lots of noise about flooding on the TV
Own your fail. ~Jer~
Interesting article in the NYT: Tiny Electric Vehicles Pack a Bigger Climate Punch Than Cars https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/09/b...-android-share
"fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
"She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
"everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy
Here’s another from NY Times
Seeking Higher Ground: Western Resorts Take Skiers Where the Snow Is
New terrain development at ski resorts, primarily in Colorado, aims to chase and preserve snow, an invaluable commodity.
About Aspen, Keystone & Steamboat adding lifts higher up the mountain.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/06/t...smid=url-share
Some of the comments are hilariously ill-informed
Stumbled on this youtuber "The Limiting Factor" yapping about various new tech. Seems green related. This video discusses grid storage technologies and why different tech serves different purposes. Discusses specific power and specific energy. This particular video uses fake numbers to illustrate the concepts, though he does include some graphic with DOE data.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nUs_ppctB4
Also watched another video of his about magnesium materials science, and why magnesium is becoming increasingly attractive to the automotive industry. He's more in depth than a lot of the crap I watch, with a little bit less math than an engineering class. Makes my head hurt some, so I'll likely watch more.
Surprising (actually not surprising given the NYT has an agenda) that the article made no mention of how electricity is produced and transmitted.
In China they are opening an average of 2 new coal fired electric generating plants per week.
In California the power grid is so outdated that rotating electric power grid blackouts have become a seasonal thing. My guess is that many home owners that can afford it have installed whole house backup generators, powered by diesel, gasoline, or propane.
Now that subsidies are winding down, in the US electric car sales have plummeted. And for millions of folks living in apartments where a recharging set up is not possible, they have never been potential EV customers.
Yes my thoughts exactly. I was going to respond the same but was tired of the conspiracy theorist abuse in here.
If the power to charge those batteries is fossil fuel based it’s not much of win. But it would at least clean up the air quality in the streets. And I’m sure the coal fired plant is running in other country polluting the less fortunate so the ebike country can claim their green victory.
You have to start somewhere, you have to start sometime. The longer we wait, the more painful, i.e. expensive, it will be.
Invest more in geothermal and concentrated solar
Just because it's hard, is no reason to resist the future
Change is always hard, especially for cranky old fucks
A lot more CA homeowners have installed solar panels than generators.
Where do you see EV sales plummeting? Sales have doubled in 2 years from 500K to 1M. I agree though that 100% EVs don't seem practical for many city dwellers and country folk (not to mention those of us with 2 houses.) I think the future belongs to hydrogen.
As for the CA grid--it is hard to see how our private electric generators can increase capacity to service an all EV fleet when they can't even stop from burning the state down.
In any case, the future really lies in replacing private cars with mass transit. A future most of us won't like.
Geothermal has a ton of potential. You don’t need to be Iceland either. My home heat and ac is ran on geothermal with just a glycol loop down a 200’ borehole. All you need is an heat exchanger to capture the temperature difference.The pump is even ran on hydro power.
My monthly bill is less than my internet bill. Even in -30 and 40 C temps.
Bookmarks