In this situation - sounds fine. My son is an August birthday and a lot of the parents hold back their kids here to give them advantages later, so he was barely 5 in a class of half 6 year olds. He sometimes struggles emotionally, but academically is totally fine.
Fine teach both. They both have their useful applications. And when a kid gets it, let the kid move on, don't take years out of his life going over the same thing. How many years do they need to draw out carrots and peas??? That's how kids get bored. I don't have a problem with mental math. It's the eclusivity. And it's the insistence on using a MENTAL technique on paper. WTAF? The execution in our school sucked.
On early mathematics, I think it was 60 Minutes that had an episode on how children instinctually add and subtract much differently than what is generally taught and what we know as adults; essentially unlearning to relearn different - perhaps no better- processes. Fascinating piece but can't seem to find it.
So whose kids had to do severeal Grades twice and turned out to be high school drop outs, strippers and rappers?
It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.
There is a revisionist history podcast episode that is pretty much about this exact topic. Season 7 episode 7. Outliers revisited. Worth a listen for any parents considering their kids skip a grade. Basically he argues not to do it. But takes it further about the month of the year you were born for everything from athletics to school to jobs. The conclusion is that kids who are slightly older even by mere months have every advantage and succeed more often at every stage of life. Food for thought. I maybe mis remembering. Been a while since I heard it.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I would tend to agree that it's not a great idea. I think it could create social issues due to the difference in age, athletics as was mentioned, and other things like dating. If your kid is really bright, there's usually some advanced classes or program you could put them in to challenge them more anyway. School can be tough enough for a lot of kids with any additional social pressure.
The academic research on schooling shows very weak evidence for age effects. It mostly looks at age of entry rather than grade skipping as there are more observations and more opportunities for quasi experiments (e.g. students falling just before/after the cutoff). They find relatively few effects at all and almost none after the first few years of elementary school.
Sports is a totally different story.
This one from Freakonomics sort of touches on this subject but I do remember the pod you're talking about as well. It may have been one of those episodes where he does a summary of a bunch of topics at the end of the year...but I can't find it: https://freakonomics.com/podcast/the...-later-replay/
Damn shame, throwing away a perfectly good white boy like that
Actually.....I'd like to hear the story if it'snot too depressing and still kind of fun. Im not here to thrive on people's misery. Rapper would be great [emoji3]
Still wondering how my little ones are going to turn out. The oldest will get into 1st grade this Fall.
It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.
Surprised this is the first time the economist Malcolm Gladwell was mentioned, yet not by name, in this thread. Or I am completely unsurprised that I missed it earlier given my stripper career.
Outliers is an excellent read. The chapter about the NHL and birthdays makes a strong argument for holding kids back for sports success. I think he extrapolated the data for academics, but I don't remember. I read the book years ago.
One is judged against their peers in school. Extracurricular activities exist. Where i grew up, the game was to have your kid be one of the older ones in the class. Take it how you will.
However, as a very successful male bod stripper, what the hell do I know.
Sent from my SM-S908U1 using Tapatalk
No matter where you go, there you are. - BB
One of mine skipped a good part of junior year of high school but still managed to graduate the following year. Go figure.
As a data point on the other side, my parents thought I showed signs of genius and started me in kindergarten at age 4 - October baby, could have gone early or late. I spent all my school years being smaller and less mature than my peers, probably a bit smarter than my peers, but that doesnt really help a kid in school. Still didnt have hair on my balls when I graduated high school. Late bloomer, started early, not a good combo. So, yeah, wait a bit.
On the good side, all those fuckers are old and fat now. I'm slightly less old and not fat. So I've got that. Fuckers.
Life is tough. It's tougher when you're stupid
We used to skip a 1/2 grade, forward or back, moving south of the equator.
That would be difficult in a language you weren’t conversant in
I was able to understand the new math because it really isn’t new math
It’s just a different way of using the basic laws of math in techniques
My kids got it each way but I used to shake my head because it seemed a way in some instances to get the right answer through a trick versus understanding
That said my kids were introduced to sets and tables much before I was and I found that interesting because a program a set driven programming language
The truly depressing thing is that teachers here in VT and I am sure else where are of the opinion that the early gifted should stay with there class and they will quickly revert to the mean
My boys were gifted in math and the oldest was allowed to skip a year in math which was a good call
I am glad he stayed with his class
His senior year he took calc one and two at university and the rest of his classes in high school
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
If we're talking sports there's the other extreme that I see a lot of lately around my parts...that's parents red shirting their kids. It's insane if you ask me. My oldest is on the older end of his class with a fall birthday...there are kids 6-10 months older than him in his class. for sports like baseball it doesn't help because it's based on your age (age as of May 1 each year, why that date who knows)...but other sports, hoops for example, some big dudes he goes up against. It's no shock because they're about a year older than him yet playing in his grade. then there have been a couple instances of kids basically 2 years older but in his grade playing against them.
It's one thing to build character but another thing to be setting up flat out unfair situations...life's not fair, I know. I guess the idea is that by the time HS rolls around they have established themselves as the premier athletes and they just make teams by default?
Damn shame, throwing away a perfectly good white boy like that
Our district is like that too. My son is in the 90s height percentile wise and has consistently been one of the shortest because most of the boys are a year or so older.
Ya, the pushback in VT against "early gifted". It's fucked up Closing the achievement gap in VT means bringing down the folks at the top of the ability range as much or more than bringing up the scores of those at the bottom. You are doubly fuct if you are "gifted" in math because the new new math curriculum taught in VT seems designed specifically to keep people from getting ahead of their peers. That's why I don't like it. I don't have anything against learning sets as, key word here, part of a well rounded approach to math. We probably wouldn't have skipped a grade with thing #2 if they could have given him harder math. Thing #3 had different teachers and they allowed him to do math a year ahead and somewhat under the radar from the principal when he got to 7th grade. He, unlike #2, was content until then.
Both thing #2 and #3 ended up with AP Calc A/B as a Jr. In HS. Commuting to Burlington was not really on the table especially because they both did after school activities. #2 took online AP Calc B/C his Sr year. #3 is taking AP stats. [#2 took stats at St Mike's the summer between 8th and 9th because he won a free class due to high early SAT scores. #2 is the one that skipped a grade.]
On the flip side being from VT does help your college admission success vs. being from a more populated state.
"timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
I was told by a guidance counselor my son wasn’t going to be separated out and placed in a higher class in order that the students that didn’t excel feel shame or something to that affect
In VT no kid gets left behind because nobody fails
The classes are geared towards getting the kids to do the work and allow retests
It worked out for my sons as well because if they did fuckup a test / they reviewed it and took it again
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I was in a 4th grade/6th grade combo class. I was in 4th grade. It was a really stupid idea. On top of that, the district at the time was experimenting with having elementary on a period system. So there were like 5 different teachers- math/english/history etc... I, of course, gravitated towards the older cool kid clique. This was not good for my grades. I got all C's. My mom said fuck that and held me back to repeat 4th in a traditional class. I was pissed at the time, but it worked out well in the end. I was always a little more mature, bigger and a little ahead academically than my classmates. This ended up giving me confidence and I think it contributed to me being more successful in school.
I would think it would not be a great idea to skip. There's no hurry here. I would rather the kid be a little bored than be frustrated and lose confidence.
The cautionary tale from growing up is one of my friends who is dead now. Super smart with a November birthday so already on the young side. Decidedly unchallenged in the slightest and bored in school. All As without trying or caring. Complete alcoholic at age 16. Didn't finish college. Married his coke supplier according to the rumors. Dead at age 46, his heart gave out from years of abuse. Nobody told me and we had been out of touch for 20+ years. Bored kids find ways to entertain themselves. Truly one of those people who might have cured cancer or worked out viable fusion reactors had he been on a different path. So I am not at all a fan of under delivering education to the smart kids.
Bookmarks