
Originally Posted by
LongShortLong
Dying delta's R was likely near 1 as well. So the proper multiplication for omicron is about one, times 3.19. That's why I contend covid's R is nowhere near measels'.
R << R0 though. R0 only happens when a naive population takes no precautions. Which is why measles outbreaks are so small: no naive population. R0 estimating requires looking at the fastest spread and then backing out factors that slowed it down to estimate the higher number.
By the time delta was dying it faced a cautious population (delta had been the deadliest to date and omicron was a fast-spreading unknown) with widespread immunity to delta: prior delta infections, some cross immunity from pre-delta exposures and strong cross immunity from omicron infections, on top of effective vaccines that became highly effective against delta with boosters. Even with heterogeneity, sub-populations got to choose their own immunity. The graphic you linked is really stark (at least for North America) but it's not very surprising given all those factors.
So no post-OG variant ever really had a chance to show off its R0. I'm not sure how much this effects the rest of your reasoning and I've got no opinion about the measles comparison. They look kinda roughly similar if I squint at a wind coming out of the sun. Maybe. IDK
<p dir="rtl">
Make efficiency rational again</p>
Bookmarks