At least I provided some stats. BSR echoed a common myth with zero support. AFAIK, there is no complete data, and that's for several reasons, e.g., there is a tradition of burying suicide data and the NRA has successfully lobbied against the federal government compiling meaningful data re firearm deaths.
If anyone has data to support the myth that .22 rounds kill more American civilians than any other caliber, let's see it.
The myth may be a carryover from the 1960s and 1970s, when so-called "Saturday night special" .22 revolvers were involved in many urban shootings and/or the use of .22LR in mob hits.
Things changed after the 1970s. Since 1980, center fire handguns (semi-autos and revolvers) have become far more popular than .22 handguns. My quick research suggests that the most popular handguns (per sales data) in the past 20 years are chambered for 9mm, .40, .380 or .38 special. .22 handguns are way down the list. The firearm assault data in the links I posted correlate closely with popularity by sales. That is, for the past decade or more, most firearm assaults (fatal and non-fatal) are by 9mm, .40, .380 or .38 special, and only a small fraction are by .22. It makes sense that most fatal shootings are by the most plentiful handguns. It's also logical to surmise that, more likely than not, the guns used for suicides also correlate with popularity (per sales) because people committing suicide by gun are likely to reach for the handgun to which they have access. And if a guy who knows anything about firearms wants to off himself, he will pick something with more firepower than a .22LR.
Again, I've never seen any support for the commonly asserted myth that .22 rounds cause more deaths than any other caliber. If there's credible data to support that myth, let's see it.
Bookmarks