One of the limits of gauging your recovery based on others' experiences online is that a tibial plateau fracture refers to a fracture at a specific anatomic location, but not necessarily a specific injury. What I mean by that is that each person's fracture is different. By the sound of it, if you needed two plates and bone graft you had both comminution (a shattering of the bone) and a significant joint line compression that left a sink hole below when the joint line was tamped back up. This is likely a more severe injuries than many.
Along this line, in the long run it can be hard to separate symptoms that stem from the severity of the injury from symptoms directly related to the hardware. Hardware pain can come in many forms, and there's a lot of unpredictability in removing it - pain that someone says is right over the plate when something pushes there is more likely to improve after removal than a more diffuse, deep ache. Sure, the heightened stiffness of the metal plates relative to the bone can, for some people, cause issues, but the majority of patients leave the plate in place. The skin around the tibial plateau is not always the most forgiving, and if you have two plates one may be posteriorly in the back of the knee where a surgeon isn't excited to chase it. Hence the risk/reward to considering hardware removal - the harder it is to remove and the less forgiving the skin, the less a surgeon rushes to do it. On the other hand, the possibility of benefit alongside the psychological benefit of having it out also matters. Talk with an experienced surgeon and weigh the risk/reward to your specific situation. Also, given the potential for continued improvement alongside the desire to allow the bones to heal, surgeons often wait a full year before considering removal forgoing extenuating circumstances.
Best of luck healing.
Originally Posted by jm2e:
To be a JONG is no curse in these unfortunate times. 'Tis better that than to be alone.
Bookmarks