regarding republicans and the congressional agenda, republicans know they have a flawed president and a limited time to make some changes
the tax reform bill is packed with all sorts of stuff that have been on the GOP wish list for years and the increase in debt is going to fuck with social services in the future
republicans are remaking the social contract through ridiculous spending and tax reductions for the rich
I'm quite certain that I possess a greater understanding of history than most people who post here, but that's beside the point.
There is going to be major social, political and cultural upheaval in the next half century. It might not be the downfall of civilization, but it will be ugly, violent and prolonged. I'm not saying I know exactly what things will look like, but I am confident that things will get a whole lot worse before we come out the other side with UBI and nobody having to work.
hey it still snows where I grew up and I started fucking around with computers - so, not so different in some ways
i don't think it is going to snow much in much of snow country in the NE in 50 - 100 years.
I think one of the things that needs to happen is work redistribution. Going to a 24 or 32 hour work-week seems likely in order to provide spots for more people. The issue then becomes how work is compensated. If an hour's work is paid at $20, for example, that rate may need to climb to $30 to assure no net loss of income, even if hours are greatly reduced. If that doesn't happen, lifestyles are damaged and that will lead to social revolt and economic collapse.
If people aren't at least evenly compensated, they will reduce consumption and that will hammer the economy. If too many people aren't working, reduced consumption will hammer the economy. In effect, people have to be compensated for the work completed through automation or we'll have economic collapse. The question is how will this ultimately play out.
Somehow the population needs to have money to spend on products or services delivered through automated methods or the purpose of having automated methods will be moot. Somebody has to buy this stuff and if the population doesn't have the money because their jobs were the victims of automation, then automation will have defeated the purpose of automating in the first place.
it's going to be interesting to see how markets react to this
Western Europe has been long dealing with the issue of too few jobs, e.g., 5 or 6 week mandatory vacation, Germany industry moving to 4-day workweek. They laugh at how many hours Americans put in at work.
On the bright side, there's a time is more valuable than accumulating stuff you don't need ethic emerging among some young adults.
My keys to happiness: #1 low expectations, #2 low overhead, #3 not caring too much how your favorite sports team does. They've worked well for me.
I've always lived well below my means, so you're preaching to the choir. Note that when I've suggested on TGR threads that people avoid borrowing money to buy a fancy car or getting out of debt as young as possible, I've gotten attacked.
That's a variation on the lump of labor fallacy. The Euros don't have too few jobs; they have labor market institutions that place more value on people and families. And they're right to do so.
It's hard not to get on the hedonic treadmill and keep up with the Joneses in our society. Props to you for having the self-awareness to try not to play that game.
Something many people have been and will continue to be unable to do. The last few years have shown us the dangers of leaving those people behind and the potential damage they can do. As much as Adam Smith tells me to let them fall, we can’t afford to do that.
Most of the disaffected didn’t get to vote last time society saw a potentially equal industrial shift and they still razed empires and produced decades of low or even negative economic growth.
Personally, I’d encourage everyone to move themselves as fast as possible into the ownership column.
^ ^ ^ Yup, that'll work
True, although many who embraced hippie low-to-the-ground living in the late 1960s and early 1970s subsequently metamorphosed into materialistic yuppies living per The Gospel of Stuff, Stuff and More Stuff. And Emerson and Thoreau wrote about the value of simple living long before that. And long before that Confucius advised that happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.
As with many things European, the mandatory vacation laws and diminishing work week are the product of deals cut between labor unions, industry and legislators, all of whom saw value in treating labor as humans rather than a commodity. They have a much better record than the U.S. re getting along the past few decades. White nativist reaction to immigration threatens the end of the era of Euro cooperation. Cf., Brexit
The scariest part about this whole thing, is that with enough time and computational power, there will be literally nothing that a robot won't be better at than a human. Sure there will be some things that are harder, like jobs that require empathy, but it's only a matter of time before we are weaker, dumber and slower than all of the robots. They'll build themselves in ways that humans can't fix, run process too complicated for our feeble minds and do every job a human once did.
What that means for us is really the question. If you look at the oil-producing rentier states, they struggle to keep their populations in line, even though they are paying the citizens from government created wealth. When a handful of people/huge corporations own all of the robots, they won't be paying normal citizens with all of the profits they are reaping, and without a major political shift they won't be paying many taxes either.
Blasphemy! In our robot-controlled world, sports is all we'll have left.
Bookmarks