Check Out Our Shop
Page 448 of 598 FirstFirst ... 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 ... LastLast
Results 11,176 to 11,200 of 14941

Thread: Ask the experts

  1. #11176
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Greg_o
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by forty View Post
    not seeing a 2014 in 26, but the 2013 uses a 184x44 with ccrd tune
    sorry, it is a 2012 Giant Trance X1.

    I'll be in the idiot thread lol.

  2. #11177
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    327
    Can an expert please explain to me what are the supposed benefits of a "premium" mountain bike stem? Apart from color, I can't think of anything that could be different performance wise for the same dimensions.

  3. #11178
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Backward_Banana View Post
    Can an expert please explain to me what are the supposed benefits of a "premium" mountain bike stem? Apart from color, I can't think of anything that could be different performance wise for the same dimensions.
    Some of the cheaper stems are maybe a bit sketchy with how they clamp, which could create issues with carbon bars. A lot of the better stems have you bottom out the face plate at the top, which ensures that there's even pressure on the bar across the clamping surface.

  4. #11179
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,478
    ^^ yep, i’ve had a cheapie that was pretty rough around edges of casting and the screw holes - nothing insurmountable but needed to clean up burrs before I was comfortable using it - I would hope the 4x premium for brandname would catch things like that in quality control

  5. #11180
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,673
    They look cooler. And if you (think you) look cooler, then clearly you’ll ride faster.

  6. #11181
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    327
    Haha, perfect. That does make sense re: the super cheap ones.

  7. #11182
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,821
    What’s the story with XC tire pressures? In the PB BC Bike Race bike check article, a lot of the pressures seem silly low.

    https://pinkbike.com/news/bc-bike-ra...ecks-2023.html

  8. #11183
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,187
    Lighter riders, lighter bikes, tires with less traction, and not going quite as fast or hitting stuff as hard.

    Basically, with an xc tire you need as much compliance and contact patch as you can get since the knobs are so small and short. Plus you want that extra bit of cushion on a short travel bike or hardtail.

    I'm basically shooting for as soft as I can get away with. Sometimes that's as low as like 18psi in a 2.4 front. Maybe less if it's slippery. Depends on weight and your gauge and all that too.

  9. #11184
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BC to CO
    Posts
    5,102
    Quote Originally Posted by D(C) View Post
    What’s the story with XC tire pressures? In the PB BC Bike Race bike check article, a lot of the pressures seem silly low.

    https://pinkbike.com/news/bc-bike-ra...ecks-2023.html
    Most are reporting around 19-20psi. That's common in the XC world. If you want to talk low, Nino runs his 2.4 EXO Aspens as low as 17psi with no inserts.

  10. #11185
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    entrapped
    Posts
    2,681
    Quote Originally Posted by Dee Hubbs View Post
    Pick a pressure and be a dick about it.
    OR
    Pick a pump and be a dick about it.
    OR
    Pick a gauge and be a dick about it.
    I fell that as long as you have consistency and adjust your pressure from your “known constant” your good to go.
    All my Lezyne pumps are within 2psi at 80psi.
    And my Toepeak and PRO hand held gauges also confirm those numbers.
    Attachment 464665
    Attachment 464666
    How close are your lezyne pumps at mountain bike pressures? E.g. 20-30 psi.

    Sent from my SM-S908U1 using Tapatalk
    No matter where you go, there you are. - BB

  11. #11186
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    1,539
    What does it mean when the bike pedals spin freely forwards and backwards and the hub "buzzing" sound is silent? Broken freehub?

    On my ride this morning about half way up the climb I heard a click/pop and the bike completely stopped pedaling, zero torque. I coasted back down to the car and it was dead silent the whole way.

  12. #11187
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,013
    Sounds like internal freehub issue. One of a couple pieces could be broken but you can't tell until you open it up. It happens

  13. #11188
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tahoe-ish
    Posts
    3,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Dee Hubbs View Post
    Most are reporting around 19-20psi. That's common in the XC world. If you want to talk low, Nino runs his 2.4 EXO Aspens as low as 17psi with no inserts.
    I can get away with 18F riding double black rocks, but the XC tires are paper thin and I have real tires. I'm pretty smooth and light, but I assume the pros are even smoother.

    Nino does tend to flat a lot... See Cape Epic 2y ago.

    It seems like XC MTB racers are still really obsessed with weight. The road world has given up--bikes are often not even at the 6.8kg UCI limit anymore. Certainly a 100g heavier tire is faster than a lighter one that flats.
    ride bikes, climb, ski, travel, cook, work to fund former, repeat.

  14. #11189
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,782
    What's the recommendation for a Shimano XT derailleur clutch adjustment bolt that keeps loosening? Back it out and put a dab of medium strength Loctite on it?

  15. #11190
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    358
    Quote Originally Posted by John_B View Post
    What's the recommendation for a Shimano XT derailleur clutch adjustment bolt that keeps loosening? Back it out and put a dab of medium strength Loctite on it?
    I would say blue is probably even a tad aggressive. White or purple (purple is designed for low torque fasteners)

  16. #11191
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Conformist, Complacent State
    Posts
    1,052
    Say you ride a 135mm bike and then a 150mm rear travel bike and then look at a tape measure.
    1.5cm doesn’t look like much visually but it feels more much.

    why?
    So the world is filled with tubular entities. Food goes in one end and shit comes out the other. Sperm goes in and babies come out.

  17. #11192
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,877
    design & component selection
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  18. #11193
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    6,183
    Quote Originally Posted by climberevan View Post
    I can get away with 18F riding double black rocks, but the XC tires are paper thin and I have real tires. I'm pretty smooth and light, but I assume the pros are even smoother.

    Nino does tend to flat a lot... See Cape Epic 2y ago.

    It seems like XC MTB racers are still really obsessed with weight. The road world has given up--bikes are often not even at the 6.8kg UCI limit anymore. Certainly a 100g heavier tire is faster than a lighter one that flats.
    It's funny to me that Kabush is running an SB120 with a 140mm fork.... and Maxxis Aspens.

  19. #11194
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Meconium View Post
    Say you ride a 135mm bike and then a 150mm rear travel bike and then look at a tape measure.
    1.5cm doesn’t look like much visually but it feels more much.

    why?
    It's 10% more. 10% is noticeable in most things.

  20. #11195
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,188
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    It's 10% more. 10% is noticeable in most things.
    Plus the 150 mm bike probably has more aggressive geo, 36 mm stanchion fork vs 34 mm, reservoir shock vs non-res, etc. If you take the 150 mm bike and short-stroke it so it only has 135 mm travel it's still going to feel like more travel than the 135 mm bike (assuming the leverage ratio doesn't go crazy in that last 15 mm).

  21. #11196
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    7,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Meconium View Post
    ..............................................
    1.5cm doesn’t look like much visually but it feels more much.

    why?
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    It's 10% more. 10% is noticeable in most things.
    That's what she said.

    You guys are asleep at the wheel, haha!
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, flying through the air

  22. #11197
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Conformist, Complacent State
    Posts
    1,052
    The 135mm is actually more aggressive. Its just mind boggling to me that when you look at a travel change about as thick as a finger, it "feels" so much more compared to a larger rock garden.
    Mostly just talking BS of my 10% perception vs physically noticing.
    10% of 8 minutes is 48 seconds. If I ran a DH 48 seconds faster the PR would "feel" more then a 10% improvement.
    Nevermind the math................
    So the world is filled with tubular entities. Food goes in one end and shit comes out the other. Sperm goes in and babies come out.

  23. #11198
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    7,040
    In seriousness, I stepped down from a 170/163 bike to a 150/140 bike, with better geometry and arguably better suspension. Big difference for me in carrying speed and just even getting through the rough stuff. For better or worse, building up a new 170/163 bike.

    Now I'd like to have a lighter 140/130ish bike...
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, flying through the air

  24. #11199
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Meconium View Post
    The 135mm is actually more aggressive. Its just mind boggling to me that when you look at a travel change about as thick as a finger, it "feels" so much more compared to a larger rock garden.
    Mostly just talking BS of my 10% perception vs physically noticing.
    10% of 8 minutes is 48 seconds. If I ran a DH 48 seconds faster the PR would "feel" more then a 10% improvement.
    Nevermind the math................
    A lot of it is just suspension kinematics and shock tunes too. There's a reason why 2 bikes with identical travel and similar geometry can feel entirely different. That difference *can* be compounded by relatively small differences in travel.

  25. #11200
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Posts
    194
    E-13 helix crank chainring lock ring… I see E-13 sells a tool that no one has in stock for the cassette and chainring. Is this just a standard BB tool or is it some weird proprietary design? Buddy is trying to remove his chainring and it’s not super clear in the manual what tool is needed, trying to figure out if I have the right one to lend but don't have the crank in front of me.

    Thanks!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •