Go for the gold, it'll match your outfit
![]()
Go for the gold, it'll match your outfit
![]()
^^^if that's yer outfit, gold would look outta place. Try again hotshot.
Yeah man! It is defiantly more of a yellow/orange, not a pure gold. I’ll personally be going for contrast.
Good to know, thanks:
Oh, and FWIW, I am putting Black RD20 bindings on my 194s and Raw ones on my 187s.
Finally got a chance to ski my FL113 yesterday. Still recovering from shoulder surgery and taking it easy, but was able to put a good amount of energy into the ski and open up the speeds a bit. Great snow, windbuff everywhere.
Conclusion... holy crap the construction of this ski is rad. So smooth, but still responsive and poppy. Very rewarding snowfeel for fast skiers on big mountains.
And good news everyone... skis are through finishing and QC, and should be shipping in the next couple days via air carrier (Fedex Global). I will follow up via email as soon as I have an expected delivery date. Cheers!!!!
Hells yes. Welcome to the congregation!
support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com
I'm having analysis paralysis on bindings.
I really want to put touring bindings on them since they're so light, but the $600+ costs are driving me back to some p14s or something.
Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
>>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<
cast is what you seek, buster.
Is there a way to have something similar to cast but be able to ski downhill on the tech binding? For example, I'm interested in the C113 for untracked resort days and for backcountry. Would love to be able to ski it with my alpine setup as well as my AT setup - is that possible without too much hassle? I'm coming from they world of tele so still learning the nuances of the fixed heel world. Else I'm thinking I would just put on an AT setup that I felt comfortable skiing at resorts on.
(As far as I can tell, the cast tech binding is not able to be used for the downhill).
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Tecton
Duke?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I rip the groomed on tele gear
I would rather ski the duke pt then a tecton for downhill but the weight difference is huge. But that’s probably what you want as long as you don’t care about weight. And do you have pin holes on your alpine boots, you are running a 50/50 boot correct?
the duke Pt will accept all soles.
I don't have pin holes on my Alpine boots. I didn't think about it much when I bought them and wanted high-performance boots for resort days (I assume high-performance boots don't normally have pin holes? I guess I should have thought about that more...). I do care about weight a little, but I'll check out both the Duke and the Tecton - thanks all.
I guess the other option is to buy the C113 for touring and the R120 for resort pow days...![]()
Buy my R120’s!
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I rip the groomed on tele gear
Last edited by Marshal Olson; 01-16-2023 at 05:04 PM.
I’m intrigued to hear more feedback on the 113 shape and how it compares to other long radius traditionally mounted powder chargers. I think I’m in the market but apprehensive about the flat/reverse camber. I’ve never quite been able to adapt to that profile.
There are some apt comparisons in the appropriate thread.
Does $415 produce a better essence?
https://www.evo.com/outlet/alpine-to...schi-tecton-12
Move upside and let the man go through...
Bookmarks