Skied some Movements today at loveland. Here's what I thought.
Goliath 191:
Pros:
Super stable, but very maneuverable, friendly, and lively. Light for such a beafy ski. Made short turns in the fall line very well - Maybe the best I have seen from this genre of ski. Laid over into GS and SuperG turns effortlessly, and felt locked to the snow. Released into a drift turn very easily and consistently. Tail is powerful without being unforgiving.
Cons:
Tail felt a little locked at times, but I think it could just need a little more detune in the tail, and because I was skiing a groomer with a ski that is meant for anything but.
Overall:
I can’t wait to get this ski out where it thrives – ripping pow and hucking cliffs. I also foresee it crushing variable snow with the tip profile and stoutness underfoot. So maneuverable for such a huge, solid ski. A great balance of power and stability with forgiveness and skiability. Unlike many in this category – this ski is not a challenge in itself. A great step forward for big mountain skis.
Thunder 177:
Pros:
Carves like nobody’s business, but does not feel hooky. VERY lively – my feet were coming off the snow between turns and the ski accelerates powerfully yet butter smooth and consistent. Stable at speed, with no foreseen speed limit. Tracks true – almost like a race ski. Burly with just enough forgiveness.
Cons:
For and all-around ski? None. Near perfect. I just want the 187.
Overall:
Sick everyday western resort ski, and would probably rock the east coast hardpack pretty well too. Bang bumps, charge crud, spin in the park and rail the groomer back to the car. Reminded me of a fattened-up Dynastar 4x4 powertrac or a fine-tuned Head im88.
Baggy:
Pros:
Buttery. Drifted very nicely through turns. Responsive to direction changes and VERY forgiving. Spins like a top.
Cons:
Only one length?! For serious? Center-ish mount is gonna be tough in the pow, which should be a priority for a ski that is 102mm underfoot. A little confused and indecisive feeling – would not readily set into a carved turn. Tracking left a little to be desired as well. Most of these problems could be solved by offering a 188-190cm length.
Overall:
A real contender in the a very popular bc freestyle class among the likes of the Gotama, Head mojo 105, etc.. Gotta get a 190 in the lineup, though, and set the mount point back a little. I'd buy the 190 right now - if they made it.
Impressions on the brand:
Attention to detail shines through in skiing all of these models. Even the characteristics that I didn’t like seem to be a deliberate result of fine-tuning for each ski’s purpose. All skis felt relatively stable, powerful, and lively. It is apparent that this is no small brand, despite it’s smallish market presence in the US. Goliath and Thunder felt like race-room skis. Dialed.
Skier: Race background, been trying my hand in big mountain events and have finished in the top ten as well as pushed my luck and beaterd all ugly-like. I like to ski fast and crank hard, surf-style turns in the open, but also dig the tedium of techy billygoat skiing and regularly get flak from my buddies for turning too much. Visit the park occasionally, and am working on throwing tricks into my all-around skiing.
Anyone else tried any of these? What y'all think?
Bookmarks