Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: Salomon Z12 ti binding durability

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mt. Badweather
    Posts
    260

    Salomon Z12 ti binding durability

    So I got a great deal on some Salomon Z12 ti's (thanks MarshalOlsen). Has anyone actually had these things blow up on them? They seem awfully light. But, it's not like I'm going to be hucking anything over 10' and I weigh a scant 150# and I'll be putting them on my Praxis and therefore will only be skiing them in soft snow.
    Please no "search Jong!", I did.
    Sucks at internets

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    6,253
    My roommate put a pair on his Goats last year. He's a bit bigger than you, hucked some small-medium sized stuff on them. Didn't seem to have any issues.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Edwards
    Posts
    278
    I'm 6'0", 195 lbs. and have z12tis mounted on my Mantras. Skied that rig about 15 days last winter and had no issues. Not much of a hucker (biggest drop probably less than 10'), but a decent skier. Hope that helps.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Redwood City and Alpine Meadows, CA
    Posts
    8,276
    Paging Tyrone Shoelaces...

    Or else go to the similar active thread on Epic.
    not counting days 2016-17

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ex-Whistler now living in NorCal
    Posts
    461
    my roommate has z12s on his ANTs and he was having problems with them pre-releasing. see this thread.
    http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=82942
    "Freeride is just an attitude, to go out in the mountains with no rules and do whatever feels sweet to you at the time." -Chris Davenport

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Le Lavancher pour le weekend
    Posts
    3,337
    yeah, there's been durability issues on 'em, but that said, this comes from big balls 'hospital air' types. at 150 and less than killing it, i'd have to think it'd be ok.
    'waxman is correct, and so far with 40+ days of tasting them there is no way my tongue can tell the difference between wood, and plastic made to taste like wood...but i'm a weirdo and lick my gear...' -kidwoo

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,628
    Quote Originally Posted by stew130 View Post
    Has anyone actually had these things blow up on them?
    yes I blew up a pair last season. I didn't go too huge on them, but did repeatedly huck them (oftentimes to hardpack) and generally beat the crap out of them until the heel pieces blew up after about 2 months of abuse. FWIW, I'm 5'10" 180 lbs.

    someone just had a similar question over on EpicSki, so here's more details:
    http://forums.epicski.com/showthread.php?t=60458

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    11,727

    should be fine for you

    I love this forum. I switched from Markers to Salomon because of what I'd read here, but of course to the WRONG Salomons. Anyway, after skiing Marker plate/piston/select control whatevers with Volants, I went to DPS Wailer 95's with Z12Ti's set at 10, (I'm 6'3" 180). I don't air now unless I have to, but I ski very scary terrain in La Grave and elsewhere, and they worked very well for the 20 or so days I skied them last season. I just bought another pair for some Volant Sins to help lighten them up. I will definitely be checking more often for cracks etc., but I still feel, (maybe less so now), confident in them. For powder, they should work well.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    184
    I'm 5'8" and 180 and have skied 45 days on them (on Big Troubles). Not a big air kind of guy (certainly everything under 10 ft.) and have had no pre-release issues at all. At your weight, I cannot see any problems. I tend to use them in soft snow conditions (tree skiing, mostly) and feel very confident with them.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,811
    I just had the heel track break--about a 100 days on them and I don't huck anything. Apparently Salomon will still warranty them--replace the heel track--because it breaks so often, but I just paid $25 to get it fixed right away. I'm going to pick up another track to fix the other binding before it breaks.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,524
    The binding itself is beefcake. The track upon which the heel piece mounts is frail. I see several break every year. If you huck, the STH 12 is a better option, but it's nearly $100 more expensive.

    Good news: Salomon 5-year warranty. If you manage to crack the heel track, you get a new one. No worries.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    People's Republic of MN
    Posts
    5,820
    I've been skking the Z-Series bindings for a number of years with no issues. I'm not crazy about the 3 point toe mount, but then again, it has never failed on me either. I have the Z12 on my Gotamas, and have Z10s on everything else. No issues, and I'm 6', 185#. Of course, it's all on-piste MN skiing, so take that into account. I'm sure the Z12s will be great on the Gots though. One thing I do like - no more worries about the wing & toe height adjustments.

    With all this said, I just bought 3 pairs of Tyrolia Peak 15s, so my remaining days on Sali's are limited.

    I should also mention that I do NOT huck much of anything, and that does matter in your decision. I keep my skis on edge all the time though - you spend a lot of time carving up ice in the Midwest. They hold just fine in those conditions.
    Gravity. It's the law.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    952
    I love it when threads like this get bumped! 3 years ago when I bought the z12's I was worried about their durability too....now 3 years later that setup is still my go-to inbounds setup(z12's mounted to some Bro 179's- the lightest setup I have ever had.). Not a single problem with the binders. In fact, I just traded a buddy a pair of old skis for some z12's he had laying around!
    "Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will..."

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    da eskalaterz
    Posts
    1,200
    I got about 100+ days on the first pair. Heel track sheared while my buddy was skiing them. He had a slightly longer BSL then me so I'll take the blame for that one. Next pair lasted about another 100 days before the brake assembly screw stripped. Needed a quick fix so the shop helicoiled it back together. About 7 days later the heel track sheared. Salomon warranty replaced the bindings. They are a compromise in my opinion. They are insanely light compared to other options but can be somewhat brittle. Given the amount of days I spend on skis a year, I should probably get into something burlier but I'm a sucker for light weight. Plus I really like the feel of the binding, they've always released when they should, and they are mad easy to get in and out of. I have two new pairs of skis mounted with them this season and so far so good.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    SE Idaho
    Posts
    3,453
    I think it's a good bump personally. Just warrantied a Z10Ti for the wife. Heel track sheared so I checked out the 912Ti I have which have the same heel track. Cracks in the base told me it was time to replace the track. What I've done in the past is taken some of my kids 7 or 9 din Kids bindings and swapped the steel track which I've never had problems with. Shaves 60 grams off each half pair for the kids and I get a more durable binding. The Z12Ti flat weighs in at 860-890g on my scale whereas the 912Ti weighs in at 1080-1120g. The extra 60g for the steel track makes sense for me.
    Driving to Targhee

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    not close enough
    Posts
    2,488
    Didn't know this was so old, but i'll play anyway.

    Had the z12 ti on my MSP's last year, and dropped a little 6 footer with a lot of speed onto bumpy hardpack. landed a bit back seat, flopping my tips up and expoloded the toepiece like a frag grenade. The impact really didn't seem that bad, but I was picking up shattered pieces of the binding from all over... At this point the binding had about 10 days on them... I however, am a fairly stout 200 pounder at 6'2'', and ski like a caveman

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    569
    I hate those toe pieces. They never worked for me. They'd pre-release every time I put the ski on edge or things got a bit too bumpy. No matter the din setting I'd still end up walking out of them.

    They're probably nice for skier with a bit more finesse, but didn't work for me. FWIW, I'm about 5' 6" and 160lbs. I prefer punk rock shows to long walks on the beach. My favorite color is blue.
    "Life's not a bitch. Life's a beautiful woman. You only call her a bitch 'cause she won't let you get that pussy." - Aesop

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    306
    Bumping this one again... Any words of warning before I consider putting these on my newly purchased Mo'Ships instead of either putting my Rossi Axial 140 Race on them instead? I would automatically go to the Rossi, but they are heavy and I don't know if they'll take a wide enough brake (yes I'm a JONG for not knowing that, but these are the bumble-bee ones from something like 2000/2001).
    Last edited by thedrew55; 08-22-2011 at 02:51 PM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,778
    Quote Originally Posted by thedrew55 View Post
    Bumping this one again... Any words of warning before I consider putting these on my newly purchased Mo'Ships instead of either putting my Rossi Axial 140 Race on them instead? I would automatically go to the Rossi, but they are heavy and I don't know if they'll take a wide enough break (yes I'm a JONG for not knowing that, but these are the bumble-bee ones from something like 2000/2001).
    I would definitely put the Rossis on there, if your going to be skiing them like Motherships usually are skied. That said, I'm nearly certain you have to bend brakes for those, I tried repeatedly to get wider ones from Rossi, and the widest they had for that vintage was 100... I did a very very poor bending job, and well, the breaks work sometimes...

    If you did it with a heat gun and proper tools, you'd be in like flynn.
    Do I detect a lot of anger flowing around this place? Kind of like a pubescent volatility, some angst, a lot of I'm-sixteen-and-angry-at-my-father syndrome?

    fuck that noise.

    gmen.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Redwood City and Alpine Meadows, CA
    Posts
    8,276
    The widest brake for that generation of Rossi/Look, IIRC, was 100mm. (But search for "canonical wide brake information" to find the thread.) But they should be bendable around the Motherships.

    I have nothing to add on the Z12, as I have studiously avoided them. I can confirm that an acquaintance, who is a very good skier but not terribly hard on his gear (50-ish, probably not more than 160 pounds) managed to destroy a pair this season.
    not counting days 2016-17

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    306
    Muchas gracias The Dad. I kind of figured that about the brakes.

    Also thanks to volklpowdermaniac. I am not as aggro as a lot of the guys in here, but I do huck the occasional 20+ and ski pretty fast. So I would probably sail the Mo'Ships as they were intended to.
    Last edited by thedrew55; 08-22-2011 at 02:54 PM.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,036
    I'd avoid the Z12s. I skied with a pair of STH14s with the same toe design and I had nothing but pre-releases. And the binding was set up correctly. Ended up having to crank the DIN higher than I should have.

  23. #23
    jgb@etree Guest
    There's a pretty decent thread on this (actually about the s914ti iirc) but probably applicable here as well.

    There seem to be some conflicting opinions about running these without the gray 17mm heel risers. Some say it's prefectly fine, others say that without the heel riser, the toe is higher than the heel & no good.

    Is there a definite verdict on this?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Wife cracked the track on z10Ti
    Never airs, skis hard but very smooth. Kinda shocked she could break a binding plate at 135 pounds.

    These things are dangerous.

    Fortunately, someone mentioned you can swap out any metal Solly track. Had an old pair of 850’s that worked perfectly as a donor.

    If you own these, remove the brake and inspect the plate underneath it.
    Or, just swap the plates for safety sake.
    Kill all the telemarkers
    But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
    Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
    Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Glacier, WA
    Posts
    366
    I think a lot of breakage of these is user error or mounting problems. It's important to put the boot in the binding and insure you have the track adjusted to the proper position for your BSL, otherwise it will greatly increase the pressure on the binding. I have three pairs of Z12 ti's mounted on my resort skis and ski the three pair 38-54 days a season. After 8 years (2 pair) and 6 years (1 pair), never had an issue. But I always adjust them so the BSL indicator is near the center of the acceptable range for whichever boot I'm using them with. I'm 6'-04" and 215 lbs. nekkid and have been skiing them at Din 8 (toes) and 9 (heels).

    I just remounted one pair of the Z12's on a new pair of 189 cm Kastle FX 95's. Still going strong. I like these bindings, both for their light weight and ease of getting in/out. Also, when they release, I'm always glad they released. I'm actually thinking of lowering the Din values a notch.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 92
    Last Post: 07-15-2011, 08:29 PM
  2. Salomon 1080 181cm w/Equippe 997 binding (din14)
    By jon turner in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-18-2007, 11:33 AM
  3. Salomon Binding assistance
    By snwbdrhoon in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 04-07-2005, 06:15 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-26-2005, 02:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •