You're saying that the dynafit vulcan chimes in at an alpine flex rating of 130 and is comparable to the lange RS 130 in stiffness?
Wow! Sounds like a big step up from the mercury, which apparently collapses at the end of its forward flex.
Is the vulcan then not a break through in AT boot stiffness and ability to drive big fat skis with authority?
Are these claims with the stock liners or with intuitions?
Are there some details on lateral and longitudinal stiffness?
I'm skeptical but prepared to pick up a pair if this is so.
Edit: leelau has the titans at 100 and the vulcan at 110. This makes more sense to me. I have been skiing titans for two years and i find them too soft for my purposes and with a foward flex that blocks. So, the question is 110 or 130 for the vulcans. Skiing them on some stiff 190cm skis with 115 underfoot will surely make clear there true stiffness. (Skiing on some 172cm x 80mm noodles probably makes anything seem stiff!)
Edit2: wild snow says the vulcans are game changers but not 130 flex.
http://www.wildsnow.com/8407/vulcan-...south-america/
Bookmarks