Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: BC 01 Vs. G3 Ascent

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Blandcouver
    Posts
    1,008

    BC 01 Vs. G3 Ascent

    Last year I learned how to tele on a friends setup and this year Im extending my tele and actually getting my own setup which is where my question stands. Im planning on buying some touring tele bindings and my two choices are the BD 01 and the G3 Ascent.

    I have done a fair bit of research on both and have been trying to talk to people that have tried both to see how they compare. I personally like the 01 better in that I have heard and believe the locking mechanism is better and stronger than the G3. I also like how the cartridges are out of the way underneath your boot and also along those lines I like how the whole setup of the 01 is lower overall than the G3. I have also been told that the 01 because of the fact that the cartridges are underfoot are more active and engage faster than the G3. Lastly, although not around long enough, I know that the G3s have had the occasional break on the toe piece and have seen a friend (although he was 200+ pounds and was not sticking any of the hucks he was doing) break the T9s on the toe piece where the rivets are and I think the BD one piece metal toe piece will be stronger.

    I know that what I just said is totally in favour of the 01 and it is biased towards it, but just the fact that Ive heard more about it is why Im leaning towards it.

    Id love to hear any info, experience, anything. Thanks.

    Edit: Yeah the title is misspelled. Very aware.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Peach Pantsuit
    Posts
    1,053
    I've personally skied neither.

    The only thing of marginal value I can add is that a buddy skis the G3 Ascents, and he has the following characteristics:

    230 pounds
    Former college nose tackle
    Skis faster than most people on alpine gear
    Very low style

    He hasn't broken them yet, which tells me they are plenty durable.
    bodies be all up on my behind

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    on the pointy end, calling the line, swearing my fucking ass off
    Posts
    4,682
    01s if you want more active. period.
    The only thing worse than the feeling that you are going to die is the realization that you probably won't.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Northshore
    Posts
    415
    01's are much better IMO. They are more active and ski much better. The G3 has 40mm of riser which gets you high enough to see your buddies on AT gear off in the distance. I've skied both a ton and I've gone with the O1 on my touring rig.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,093
    If you have an "Old Skool" lower style, you might prefer the G3. Most people crossing over to tele these days prefer a higher stance with powerful boots, and the O1 provides that in spades. It's also more durable.

Similar Threads

  1. BD 01 versus G3 Ascent, what to do?
    By TeleSlayer in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-25-2006, 07:42 PM
  2. Any thoughts on the new G3 Ascent tele binding?
    By COnative in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 03:16 PM
  3. FS/TRADE: Marmot Alpinist Ascent, Gore-Tex XCR, Jacket - Med *NEW*
    By gloryandconsequence in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-12-2005, 01:39 AM
  4. TR Retallack BC, Rico Mtn. 1st client ascent / descent (vid)
    By truth in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-15-2005, 07:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •