Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: Light rainshells?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Powpow New Guinea
    Posts
    2,981

    Light rainshells?

    Looking for a light rainshells for backpacking, camping, maybe spring ski touring. Lighter the better, also don't want to spend a fortune. Waterproof/breathable. What are you using and why?

    Looking at

    Marmot Precip
    Patagucci Rainshadow
    MH Epic

    do I need Goretex or will proprietary stuff do the trick?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    13,603
    The Precip is pretty nice and it's very cheap when on sale. Mine lasted for a few years before delamming around the seams became problematic. The fit was okay, too.
    Your dog just ate an avocado!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    8,881
    The gore stuffs better than the alternatives (H2NO, Precip, Conduit) in my experience, especially if it's really raining/snowing (when you want it to work). Outdoor Research has a decent paclite shell for $200, you can find the lightweight Arc'teryx shell for $250.
    Elvis has left the building

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    586
    vote for precip. picked one up for $30 to use for field work, i like it and use it for backcountry skiing too (photog friendly red).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,843
    mountain hardware epic off SAC for like 50 bucks, literally 100% waterproof, and packs down to softball size while weighing next to nothing. I keep it with me in my backpack when i'm mountain biking, i hardly even notice it's there!
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    precip is not very breathable. sucks for hiking with weight - you get super sweaty. i WAY prefer paclite or whaever non-gore 2.5 layer there is. way lighter, more packable, more breatable, and very similarly waterproof.
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  7. #7
    Squatch Guest
    i recommend the old 3-holes-in-a-garbage-bag. So cheap you can practically throw them away!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Near Perimetr.
    Posts
    3,857
    Personally i would go with paclite.

    Have tried out the hyvents,conduit and precip. And in they suck in my opinion.
    Either they let the water in or wont let properly.
    But they are almost half or quarter of price,though.

    But if you need to stay dry=paclite.

    The floggings will continue until morale improves.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    22,980
    Quote Originally Posted by Squatch
    i recommend the old 3-holes-in-a-garbage-bag. So cheap you can practically throw them away!
    don't forget the small garbage bags around the sneakers!!!
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    Quote Originally Posted by soul_skier
    literally 100% waterproof
    PS: nothing is 100% waterproof, considering THERE ARE HUGE FUCKING HOLES FOR YOUR HANDS, HEAD, ZIPPER, and WAIST
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    none
    Posts
    8,856
    I have the Precip and the REI clone. I like the clone just as much or better for <$100.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Carson Range
    Posts
    379
    Another vote for the MH Epic. I've had mine 4 years and I love it. It's gotten my through some pretty crappy weather in the Swiss Alps and on Mt Shasta. It's still going strong, it'll be with me on Shasta this weekend.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    416
    Patagonia specter, hands down. Lighter, more packable, and still all the waterproof/breathability you want. Bomber enough to wear in winter but made for summer. Little pricey, though... but you get what you pay for.
    To have a great adventure and survive requires good judgment. Good judgment comes from experience. And experience, of course, is the result of poor judgment. -Geoff Tabin

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    Quote Originally Posted by alpinepronghorn
    Patagonia specter, hands down. Lighter, more packable, and still all the waterproof/breathability you want. Bomber enough to wear in winter but made for summer. Little pricey, though... but you get what you pay for.
    I have the Houdini which is not the full on waterproof version and you can find them on sale for approx $50. The hangup is it's a softshell so it's only water resistant but it's only 4 oz and has kept me dry in a sprinkle but I doubt it would do much in a real rain storm. If you need the waterproofness, definitely check out the Specter.
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    Well, I'm not allowed to delete this post, but, I can say, go fuck yourselves, everybody!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    8,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Conundrum
    If you need the waterproofness, definitely check out the Specter.
    I had the prior model. Not so great on either the waterproof or breathable front, but cut nicely. Except the zippers on the front pockets constantly caught on the pocket mesh
    Elvis has left the building

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    Quote Originally Posted by cj001f
    I had the prior model. Not so great on either the waterproof or breathable front, but cut nicely. Except the zippers on the front pockets constantly caught on the pocket mesh
    Bummer, I really like the cut on the Houdini and was hoping the Specter would be the same only waterproof
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    Well, I'm not allowed to delete this post, but, I can say, go fuck yourselves, everybody!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sandy Eggo
    Posts
    1,182
    Quote Originally Posted by Conundrum
    Bummer, I really like the cut on the Houdini and was hoping the Specter would be the same only waterproof
    Mine is waterproof. And breathable.

    Performance as good as my heavier, winter Pata coat.

    People who say '100% waterproof' have never hiked in the rain for more than a few minutes.

    If it's raining, you will get wet. Period.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    1,074
    That SAC deal on the MH Epic was unreal. Great jacket. Waterproof (in spite of Marshalolson's objections), lightweight, excellent venting, good big pockets, and packs small.
    ________________________________________________
    If pigs had wings there'd be no bacon

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    I really like my Sierra Designs rainshell. I can't remember which model I have, but it's a couple of years old anyway. Great price too. Highly recommended.

    www.sierradesigns.com
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    Quote Originally Posted by Cirquerider
    That SAC deal on the MH Epic was unreal. Great jacket. Waterproof (in spite of Marshalolson's objections), lightweight, excellent venting, good big pockets, and packs small.
    FYI: all "waterproof" means is the piece has taped or welded seams. that is all. all rain gear is "waterproof", as is a triple layer shell, especially anything treated with a DWR.

    i have yet to see anyone rocking a gasket on thier precip shell, so the jacket is not truly 100% waterproof, considering more water gets into a jacket through the holes and zippers than it does be seeping through the fabric or seems.

    furthermore, raingear has so much less breathability than a piece of paclite, you get far more condensation with double layer rain gear than any possible seepage from paclite.

    i would personally only use full on raingear as a suit, in the rainforrest, otherwise there are better options that are lighter and just as water repelent.




    HOMER- buy the lowe alpine paclite shell (dunno the model) sick price, retared light, super waterproof and super breathable. also there is a 2xl - i think you are kinda big? i'm 6'2'' 215 and it fits like $$$.

    http://www.sierratradingpost.com/pro...x?baseno=44561
    Last edited by marshalolson; 05-16-2006 at 06:09 PM.
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpy/Stevens
    Posts
    1,299
    For value, any of the Marmot Precip Plus stuff is really awesome.
    eating and sleeping is serious business

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    6,183
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson
    precip is not very breathable. sucks for hiking with weight - you get super sweaty. i WAY prefer paclite or whaever non-gore 2.5 layer there is. way lighter, more packable, more breatable, and very similarly waterproof.
    My thoughts exactly. I have an arcteryx paclite that i got after my precip delam'd... 100 times better.

    If I did it again, I might check out the cloudveil drizzle jacket though...
    $110 at cloudveil.com for a l/xl right now... http://www.cloudveil.com/product/S5-3275/

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    ^^^ thats a pretty sweet jacket at a killer price.

    2.5 layer = non-gore branded paclite clone. same stuff.
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Pyreenes & Alps
    Posts
    315
    I can recommend the Patagonia Microburst. Light, very packable, very waterproof, bombproof construction for a jacket this light. It's one of the 2.5 layer H2No (non gore) products commented before.
    "...climb if you will, but remember that courage and strength are naught without prudence, and that a momentary negligence may destroy the happiness of a lifetime. Do nothing in haste, look well to each step, and from the beginning think what may be the end." - Edward Whymper, Scramble Amongst The Alps

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    ne pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,061
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson
    i'm 6'2'' 215 and it fits like $$$.

    http://www.sierratradingpost.com/pro...x?baseno=44561
    good arm length? i'm also 6'2"....seems like many shells come up short on the arm length for me, off hand i remember the MH epic was wayyyy short for me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •