I’ve been a member but mostly a “lurker” to this board for a while. I hate for this to be my first real post but after much “googling” and reading others’ injuries threads, this forum seems to be the most helpful. I’m a poster on the Killington Zone board and a friend of Sprite’s and MtnMan’s and know some other Maggots who frequent Killington. Also met other Maggots at the EC mini summit last year at Stowe. And, right now I’m supposed to be at the TGR Summit this week in Whistler with MtnMan and crew but sadly had to cancel due to a knee injury and surgery this week.
Had my initial injury on January 21..... heard, felt something which I assume was that dreaded “pop,” the knee buckled from underneath me and I skidded sideways. Didn’t think I could get up for a moment but I eventually did, skied down and called it a day. Thought it was nothing and I could “walk it off.” Actually skied on it two weeks after the injury with a stabalizer brace but only lasted an hour or two each day.
Finally went to a Doc in February - Diagnosis: Torn Meniscus, intermediate-high grade ACL tear (according to the MRI, not detached), osteoarthritis from an old small meniscus tear, fractured tibia and joint out of place. No PT before surgery because of where and how the fracture was and the state of the joint.
Had the surgery on Tuesday and after the Doc got in there with the camera he found that my ACL was totally ruptured. Apparently the two bones totally separated which caused the underlying bone to fracture. The ACL was in the proper place but apparently just floating there which is why it wasn’t picked up on the MRI.
The dilemma: Doc, said he doesn’t feel it’s necessary right now to reconstruct the ACL. He said he wants me to concentrate on heavy duty PT and building up the muscles more than ever around the knee (obviously PT will be longer than originally planned), said I can go back to skiing next season (and my other physical activities) but under no circumstances can I ski without the derotational brace (yea, no kiddin' Doc). My question is, can I function without an ACL? Little background on my skiing history.... learned when I was in my teens, skied lots and then in my late 20's and 30's it was only trips out west once or twice a year (would have loved to ski more then), I guess you can call me an intermediate skier, do steeps, do bumps and trees as best I can (had been working on getting better last season and this with the bumps and trees) and I’m working on becoming more aggressive. Last two seasons put in about 40+ days (this season, obviously not that many). Active off-season with hiking, biking and running.
I’ve been getting mixed feedback on functioning without an ACL. The folks I’ve spoken to who do not have an ACL are excellent skiers, however they’re males. I was told today that an active female needs an ACL more than a male because of physical make-up. My fear is, if I don’t have the ACL reconstructed and continue to ski and get better and more aggressive, will I be facing knee replacement in a few years and/or be prone to another injury? I know this question will come up but I’m.... well, let’s say somewhere between 40-45 years old.
After my stitches are out and I get the Doc’s surgery report, I do intend to go for a second opinion about whether reconstruction is necessary but in the mean time, just looking for others’ experiences and any feedback. Thanks.
Bookmarks