Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Newbie AT setup?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Yay Area
    Posts
    552

    Newbie AT setup?

    Hey everyone, I'm trying to get into AT this year, but I'm pretty clueless on what to buy. Can anyone give me some recommendations on what kind of skis/bindings/boots to buy?

    I'm about 5'8", 125, and I ski Volkl Gotama 176's every day. I'm a pretty advanced skier, but a total newbie to AT. Can anyone recommend something?
    Salt, Sweat, Sugar on the asphalt

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    838
    First, buy a beacon, a shovel, and a probe and either take an avy course, and practice searches with friends that are experienced in the BC. This is $400 (minimum) that is the cost of entry. No way around it.
    -----------------------------------
    If you ski and like Gotamas, they make a great BC ski.

    Buy some skins ($100-120) and a pair of Fritschis/Naxos (~$350) and you're good to go on your alpine boots, at least to get started. Both are good and durable and cost about the same. Another $450 that's pretty unavoidable.

    If you decide you like it, then you can consider AT boots and a dedicated BC ski, and you'll have a much better idea of what kind of ski you would want for the BC terrain you prefer.

    Spend any left over cash on creatine.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    das heights
    Posts
    2,542
    I would buy: rossi squad 84 0r 89 and freerides,

    but that is just me

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    I like my gotamas are touring skis.

    I'm on the 183. Used to have FR, but just got Naxo Nx21. I'll post a review of the naxo when I get to ski them.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    the ether
    Posts
    6,389

    Exclamation

    Trekkers.
    Drive slow, homie.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Maple Syrup and Lumberjacks, eigh.
    Posts
    4,289
    Quote Originally Posted by Z
    Trekkers.
    fuck that. snowshoes are where it's at.
    ::.:..::::.::.:.::..::.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    the ether
    Posts
    6,389
    Quote Originally Posted by wicked_sick
    fuck that. snowshoes are where it's at.
    fuck that. Flip-flops are the way to go.
    Drive slow, homie.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    8

    Bah

    Quote Originally Posted by Z
    fuck that. Flip-flops are the way to go.
    Pffffft. Shoes are for pussies.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    A Material World
    Posts
    1,667


    You might want to add a little bit about the sort of skiing you want to do. If you want to cover a lot of ground, bag peaks etc think dynafit. If you want to access stuff from the lift area then prolly naxo/freeride make more sense. There is some variety in terms of what the gear is targeted at.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,527
    Quote Originally Posted by Highway Star
    .................If you want to ski agressively, p18's+trekkers.
    your such a pussy

    real men don't ski DIN less than 20
    Kill all the telemarkers
    But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
    Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
    Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    A Material World
    Posts
    1,667
    Out of curiosity, have you actually skinned such a setup? How far?


    Quote Originally Posted by Highway Star
    .................If you want to ski agressively, p18's+trekkers.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    People's Republic of Shitshow
    Posts
    7,581
    I ditched my freerides....just not comfortable for random pre-release and random walkmode...

    i mean sure, they are great if you just want to skin pow laps...


    but if you huck bigger than say 6 inches fuck em...


    im one of the many who has ditched the floprides and are going trekker...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    548
    I've heard a ton of bad things about trekkers, how they damage easily and whatnot, so AT bindings DIN settings are too low?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sandy Eggo
    Posts
    1,182
    Lots of people on Trekkers, apparently. I would like to go on a tour with them.

    Somehow the people on this board doing the coolest trips all seem to do OK with AT bindings. What a coincidence.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    838
    Quote Originally Posted by MOHSHSIHd
    but if you huck bigger than say 6 inches fuck em...
    Mine seem to have held up to hucking just fine. Bought this pair in Spring 2002. Still using them. Had one li'l problem in that whole time and BD turned them around for free even though they were 3 years old...


  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by Highway Star
    Sure they break, I broke a heel clip part the other day. Need to carry parts just in case. Looking into some better bails/clips though.

    If I'm going to hike something, I want my full alpine gear on the way down.
    I guess that makes sense, I didn't realize AT bindings weren't as good as alpine bindings for the way down. I'll have to look into it

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by Sphinx
    Lots of people on Trekkers, apparently. I would like to go on a tour with them.

    Somehow the people on this board doing the coolest trips all seem to do OK with AT bindings. What a coincidence.
    Your sample may not be the best indicator of what people in the BC are doing.

    It would be ridiculous to take alpine bindings and trekkers for remote ski mountaineering objectives. Fritschis are great bindings for tours and all but the hardest/biggest hucks (I ride mine inbounds at Jackson every day), but for the faraway (& very cool) stuff, you'll find the much lighter gear (yet still plenty burly) on the feet of the ski mountaineers.

    My Fritschis have been on my descents of the Grand & peaks 17K and above in Alaska. I've used my Dynafits on plenty of stuff 50 degrees and up. Not much hucking going on there, but I was plenty comfortable with those bindings in situations where there would be no margin for error and serious consequences for a pre-release.

    Trekkers are a great intro setup, but when you realize you like touring and can go soooo much farther (or take extra laps) due to the redux in weight, you might convert.

    Also, if you do go the trekker route, keep in mind that if you DON'T enjoy the tour, it may not be a true indicator of whether you would enjoy TOURING with lighter gear.

    If you are at all serious and have the cash, I'd suggest at least going with a Fritschi binding. If less cash and questioning whether you'll like it or how often you'll go, Trekkers are fine.

    Have fun!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Front Range Bitch...
    Posts
    590
    Excellent and realistic advise...
    Tact is for those not witty enough to be sarcastic...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •