Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Binding hole pattern: Jester 16 and Duke PT 16

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    68

    Binding hole pattern: Jester 16 and Duke PT 16

    I was hoping someone can either confirm or direct me to where I can find out if the hole pattern between these two bindings are the same? I'm effectively looking to see if I could remove a Jester 16 and just replace it with a Duke PT 16 using the same holes. I'd like to avoid having to redrill. Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    On another tangent.
    Posts
    4,023
    This is what I have. Heels are the same:
    Best regards, Terry
    (Direct Contact is best vs PMs)

    SlideWright.com
    Ski, Snowboard & Tools, Wax and Wares
    Repair, Waxing, Tuning, Mounting Tips & more
    Add TGR handle to notes & paste 5% TGR Discount code during checkout: 1121TGR

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    68
    Quote Originally Posted by AlpiNord View Post
    This is what I have. Heels are the same:
    Much appreciated. I'm thinking of installing inserts so i can switch between the two bindings so I have the option to two between two skis.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,888

    Binding hole pattern: Jester 16 and Duke PT 16

    Was considering a similar project but is there enough clearance between the toe screws to do this safely? Looks like there are three holes in a row close up front, back toe piece PT holes about a cm away from the front jester holes , then a bit over a cm from the back Jester holes.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    109
    Dont think this necessitates a new thread so hope folks dont mind asking here. Anyone know if next seasons new Jester X will have the same mounting pattern as past Jester Griff Royal fam bindings?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2024
    Posts
    69
    About the inserts idea:
    The Duke PT toe pattern is the same as an alpinist toe, but shifted foward quite a bit. From the slidewright diagram it looks like 31mm between centers of Duke PT holes. So if you align the Jester holes right in the middle of those (which obviously would keep you inside your adjustment range in the heel, and throw the mount point off by like a mm or something), then you'd have 15.5mm between insert hole center. BF claims their inserts are 7.8 mm in diameter and you should have 5 mm between them, so
    screw radius + 5mm distance + screw radius = 12.7 mm < 15.5 mm.
    So unless I&#39;m making some mistake it should be fine? Others here definitely know inserts better than I do, maybe they&#39;re okay having them much closer than 5mm apart as well?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2024
    Posts
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by CYJ View Post
    Dont think this necessitates a new thread so hope folks dont mind asking here. Anyone know if next seasons new Jester X will have the same mounting pattern as past Jester Griff Royal fam bindings?
    Hadn&#39;t heard of a Jester X before, do you mean something like
    https://www.newschoolers.com/ski-gea...16-X-Blaze-114
    this? If so that just looks like a repainted Jester.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    109
    https://www.newschoolers.com/forum/t...thread?page=18 No, theres a new Jester X Mwerks (along with a Griffon version) coming out with a lower stand height, possibly a fixed metal afd vs the current sliding one, and a shorter construction. Thinking about it, my guess is the mounting patter will probably be different if theyre advertising a shorter construction.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •