Originally Posted by Z
Yep. Keep my 900s at 13-14, while the 916s work fine at 11-12.
Originally Posted by Z
Yep. Keep my 900s at 13-14, while the 916s work fine at 11-12.
Just have two observations about the discussion in this thread so far.
1) Isn't the age of your bindings also something to consider when setting your DIN. The older the bindings the more likely the DIN needs to be raised. However, I guess everyone else here is spancered or gets new bindings every year.
2) Damn people are skinny here, eat something.
"Don't drive angry."
Best quote from the movie "Groundhog Day"
I feel so inferior.
I voted 8, but then I checked, and I'm closer to 8.5/9. Freerides.
And then, with all this talk, I clicked in, and yep, I can release standing still, with my wimpy little AT boots.
Hmmm.
I do crank them up to 11 when I don't want a ski coming off, and I just ski more conservatively on the flats.
6'3", 210, size 13/14 feet.
I think if i blow on my freerides the wrong way they will release.Originally Posted by Sphinx
![]()
No worries, I have Dynafits, too.
heh. not the response i would expect, but ok.Originally Posted by Sphinx
I think if I put dynafits on my skis i would murder them within 1 hour of skiing. Unless i can set them at 24. In which case I am so fucking in.![]()
![]()
Eleventyfourand a half.
My feet are tiny.
Slow pitch...Originally Posted by Tippster
"Don't drive angry."
Best quote from the movie "Groundhog Day"
MTV disproved this theory.Originally Posted by sea2ski
I keep my bindings set around 9 or 10, and I'm about 5'4" and 130 pounds. I'm pretty small, but I jump a alot and keeping the din that high works pretty well, I still prerelease a bit, though.
Except MARKER, hence there suckiness. I have a pair of high DIN Markers set at 11.5 and they really suck. Come of at the weirdest times, an example would be when I'm in ice moguls in complete control. I'm not a great technical skier. Sheet in and sail ugly is my motto for skiing. But damn, they suck.Originally Posted by Skip Dooley
With my weight and boot length at the "extremo" column on the DIN charts I'm a 8.5.
"Marker" spelled backwards is "Launch"![]()
Every man dies. Not every man lives.
You don’t stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.
I like to keep my looks and my sollies at 16. However Im not a jibber either.
Huh. I always thought it was WREcKRAMOriginally Posted by Jim S
Dude, don't max your springs. 12 max on S900's. Anything else WILL prematurely evacuate.Originally Posted by natty dread
Chocolate? This is doodoo, BABY!
And you wonder why you Naxos wont last...Originally Posted by mtbakerskier
Graaaaaaaantt?!
The floggings will continue until morale improves.
How's your acl?Originally Posted by Endlessseason
No.
You wouldn't destroy them.Originally Posted by Z
You might prerelease a bunch, but you won't destroy them. They're hard to destroy.
And given the softness of Dynafit compatible boots, you might not even prerelease!
Plus, the new Dynafit goes to 12 this year.
Or just get the race Dynafits that don't have lateral release.
heh. i bet i wouldn't destory them....Originally Posted by Sphinx
By murder, i mean i would take my ski pole, and physically murder them.![]()
A pole won't help you much. It would take a #3 pozidrive and a tiny allen wrench.
I bet their metal to plastic mass ratio is higher than P18s. Bragging rights, baby!
5'11", 185lbs. and I ski my P18's at 10-11 early season, 12-14 usually.
It's heartbreaking to see a chick who's too anorexic.
I end up leaving my fronts lower than the rear. My tall stature allows the rear to heal lift out at lower settings, but my low body wieght wont twist out of the fronts correctly at the same setting. It's the tall skinny guy combo.
I no longer mess with bindings. I'm now using Velcro and have had zero problems. As far as weight savings...wow!
Screw it then. I'll just ship em out to mildbill. He'll take care of em.Originally Posted by Sphinx
![]()
![]()
Nope. I ski with my bindings set at manufacturers recommendations. And still blew out a knee skiing about 6 years ago. My other (recent) blown knee was mountain biking, on flat pedals no less. I'm talented.Originally Posted by eldereldo
I've read studies that said you could still tear an ACL if your bindings were set at the lowest possible settings. It doesn't take much force at all, and I know when I blew my knee skiing it wasn't a motion that would have made my bindings even try to release - my foot stayed still and I fell backwards and to the side (in bumps). My lesson learned out of the whole thing was to quit pushing myself when I'm too tired and sore - that's when I'm going to get hurt. My DIN setting was where it was supposed to be and I don't believe it would have made any difference if it was set lower or higher.
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "Wow, what a Ride!"
Bookmarks