Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 35 of 35

Thread: Spot vs In reach vs ?

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Slightly off route
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    Redundant; maybe. But redundancy is a useful characteristic when it comes to life saving equipment.

    I sense the market will adjust if satellite texting becomes a thing. I'd consider a lower-cost InReach as the bomb proof back-up to my now-satellite capable texting phone.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Shuswap Highlands
    Posts
    4,709
    Did a bit of searching and found this:

    “Until recently, Apple hasn’t said too much about the satellite network it’s using; in September, an Apple spokesperson told Reuters that it had partnered with Globalstar to deploy the satellite infrastructure and investing a whopping $450 million to cover 95% of the costs involved in building and launching new satellites to power its futuristic emergency SOS network.”
    https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile...668108457-2-2/

    So maybe globalstar will get a very much needed upgrade? Until proven though, my reservations on using any emergency coms via the globalstar system remains.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    1,367
    Kind of annoyed by the inreach billing policy on the flex plan...seems like it is designed to capitalize on forgetfullness...

    Looks like if you say start a month of service on September 1st, you have to set it to renew and manually cancel if you don't want service starting October 1st. Even though the flex plan is designed to be turned on and off, there's no way to just pay a month.

    If you go to cancel it on September 15th, it will immediately cancel your service rather than letting your service continue to work through September 30th (even though you paid the full month rate).

    Most subscription services let you keep the full period you paid for if you cancel renewal...kinda scummy.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Seattle Area
    Posts
    148
    I saw that Garmin recently changed the available inReach plans.

    The existing tiers are tweaked slightly at an increased cost (of course...)
    But they added an "enabled" plan which is $8/mo and basically keeps your device on the network, and check in messages and texts are both pay-per while SOS is free.
    I think you would still have to pay an activation fee if your device was inactive.

    This seems like an improvement over the old yearly fee and $15/mo (?) of the old plan where you could activate it for only a few months at a time.
    I currently do the $12/mo plan and carry it with me fairly frequently but have have only used it to send a message or check in a handful of times.
    I imagine that most people are in the same basic use case as me where the new plan might be worth swapping to.

    https://support.garmin.com/en-US/?fa...1v3zNcPXlBnlI8

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,639
    I have and use a zoleo. Probably have it on 50? days a year. Messaging can be slightly delayed sometimes, but reliable, and inexpensive compared to garmin.
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,940
    Quote Originally Posted by MottN View Post
    I saw that Garmin recently changed the available inReach plans.

    The existing tiers are tweaked slightly at an increased cost (of course...)
    But they added an "enabled" plan which is $8/mo and basically keeps your device on the network, and check in messages and texts are both pay-per while SOS is free.
    I think you would still have to pay an activation fee if your device was inactive.

    This seems like an improvement over the old yearly fee and $15/mo (?) of the old plan where you could activate it for only a few months at a time.
    I currently do the $12/mo plan and carry it with me fairly frequently but have have only used it to send a message or check in a handful of times.
    I imagine that most people are in the same basic use case as me where the new plan might be worth swapping to.

    https://support.garmin.com/en-US/?fa...1v3zNcPXlBnlI8
    Might also be a response to the new IOS and Android satellite texting? I guess a lot of folks would drop their plans completely once that rolls out.

    I'll be dropping down to the $8 plan myself. Paying per message is a lot easier than shutting it down for the months I do not need it.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,483
    I just dropped to the $8 plan since it’s primarily an emergency device, and I might send a message once or twice a year with it. If I suddenly need to send a lot of messages in an emergency situation, I’m happy to pay for it at that time.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Seattle Area
    Posts
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by Phall View Post
    I have and use a zoleo. Probably have it on 50? days a year. Messaging can be slightly delayed sometimes, but reliable, and inexpensive compared to garmin.
    When I was comparing these a couple years ago the zoleo was a little less expensive for the device and the activation, but the plans were more expensive. Of course depends on your use case. I ended up with an inReach mini, and just decided it was simpler to leave active all the time on the lowest plan.

    Quote Originally Posted by ASmileyFace View Post
    Might also be a response to the new IOS and Android satellite texting? I guess a lot of folks would drop their plans completely once that rolls out.

    I'll be dropping down to the $8 plan myself. Paying per message is a lot easier than shutting it down for the months I do not need it.
    Yeah same. Not ready to drop the inReach with the just the SOS and occasional location updates on IOS, but will be more tempted when messaging rolls out if reliability is good. Its only a matter of time till PLBs are a thing of the past.
    They also have only said that it will be free for two years after phone activation and not how much it will cost after...and I'm more of a new phone every 4 years kinda guy, so we'll see.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,929
    I too dropped to $8 plan. I get redundancy and burliness of an inReach, along with Garmin Rescue answering SOS instead of whoever picks it up at Apple.

    I did use text messages and preset relatively frequently -- often near my allocated 10 a month. But (for now) I can do that on my iPhone easier for free or pay the $.10/$.50 cost if iphone isn't working for some reason.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,429
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    Garmin Rescue answering SOS instead of whoever picks it up at Apple
    To me this is still a big selling point for Garmin for now. Their dispatch is pretty proven at this point at getting relevant information to actual rescuers quickly and efficiently. Apple may do just as good a job or even better, but they're unproven so far.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •