AI is your new master ....

[mud]

I'm having fun with some of the apps.
https://www.d-id.com/



https://studio.d-id.com/share?id=b39...tm_source=copy

[JimmyCarter]

Sam Altman is a grifting sociopath

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/09/open...p-project.html

[mud]

^Useful idiot for MS right now, they need someone on the board as a hype man that is not an engineer.

[huckbucket]

This blew my mind. I made a gif out of the image below (daughter's homework) and attached it to a new GPT 4 chat and it created a new program in python to solve the problem.

Problem






Answer








Here's the code it created

from scipy.optimize import linprog

# Coefficients for the objective function (total weekly cost)
labor_cost_per_hour = 12.50
costs = {
'Plant1': 20 * labor_cost_per_hour + 50,
'Plant2': 16 * labor_cost_per_hour + 80,
'Plant3': 10 * labor_cost_per_hour + 100
}
c = [costs['Plant1'], costs['Plant2'], costs['Plant3']]

# Coefficients for the inequality constraints
A = [
[20, 16, 10], # Labor hours constraint
[5, 8, 7], # Raw material constraint
[-1, -1, -1] # At least 1400 motorcycles constraint (negative for >=)
]
b = [
525 * 40, # Total labor hours available
9400, # Total raw material available
-1400 # At least 1400 motorcycles (negative for >=)
]

# Coefficients for the bounds of each x_i
x0_bounds = (0, 750) # Plant 1
x1_bounds = (0, 750) # Plant 2
x2_bounds = (0, 750) # Plant 3
bounds = [x0_bounds, x1_bounds, x2_bounds]

# Solve the linear programming problem
result = linprog(c, A_ub=A, b_ub=b, bounds=bounds, method='highs')

# Check if the optimization was successful
if result.success:
# The number of motorcycles to produce at each plant
motorcycles_to_produce = result.x
# Total weekly cost
total_weekly_cost = result.fun
(motorcycles_to_produce, total_weekly_cost, result.message)
else:
(None, None, result.message)

[Mazderati]

I should start looking for a new job.

[PB]

Yet another reason why I'm so glad I don't actually need a job any more.

[Meadow Skipper]

Yet another reason why I'm so glad I don't actually need a job any more.

+ motherfuckin’ 1

Though it’s hard to imagine AI taking over dealing with wildfire and/or ski patrolling. Probably just another shortcoming on my part.

[Core Shot]

Fuck the coding. Although it is nice.

I’m stunned that gif can be scanned interpreted and solved, with response in good engrish and then solved in python.

The crazy thing about the coding are the notes. AI doesn’t need that. But it’s proper coding for a human.

[NBABUCKS1]

man this is improving at an insane rate. what the hell do you do to distinguish disinfo and reality. it's literally impossible

https://twitter.com/Shayan86/status/1758235524957893064

[smmokan]

It'll be interesting to see how the social media companies handle this, especially for the upcoming elections. At some point, a large majority of what people see in their "news feed" is going to be totally fake and literally unbelievable.

[MakersTeleMark]

It'll be interesting to see how the social media companies handle this, especially for the upcoming elections. At some point, a large majority of what people see in their "news feed" is going to be totally fake and literally unbelievable.

At some point?

[PB]

At some point?

Well yeah ..... that point was a while ago.

[byates1]

https://youtu.be/NXpdyAWLDas?si=XXaWdTdFAevHKE94

Well. Damn.

[huckbucket]

https://youtu.be/NXpdyAWLDas?si=XXaWdTdFAevHKE94

Well. Damn.

That’s some crazy shit. Three months ago we were amazed at pics of chick mma fighters. Wtf?

[Meadow Skipper]

Sobering.

[climberevan]

Ms CE has refused to watch that MB video even though it's been in our feed front and center. Her job is probably a goner in a few years.

The world is seriously not ready for this stuff and it's going to get really ugly, really quickly.

[Mazderati]

Yeah, but it will never be able to clean toilets! Checkmate, AI!

[Mazderati]

The most ridiculous part of all this is the widespread readiness to accept AI companies will put meaningful guardrails in place.

[Timberridge]

Cheer up people. We'll always need humans to run to HD when the box fan breaks and the computers go down.

[Dantheman]

"Remember, this is the worst this technology will ever be."

Hang on to your seats, folks.

[pfluffenmeister]

Think they'll take us along when the Singularity hits?

[smmokan]

The most ridiculous part of all this is the widespread readiness to accept AI companies will put meaningful guardrails in place.

Listen to the Joe Rogan podcast with Tristan Harris (of the Social Dilemma), and you'll have absolutely no faith in those companies doing anything right or just for humanity since it all depends on their bottom line. They don't give a fuck.

And MTM- above I was referring to the percentage of evil/fake/untrustworthy AI-created video that will soon be infiltrating social media, not just general BS content which has been bad for some time. I mean, it has to become an existential threat to social media right? If the amount of fake and straight-up deceptive video hits a critical mass and people stop clicking on it, then they can't continue to serve ad content to the users. But there's really nothing that can be done to stop it...

[old goat]

I haven't been following this thread so forgive me if this is old news, but piece on the news this afternoon about how AI uses more electricity than crypto, plus a shit ton of water, and it's just getting started. Given that energy is a zero sum game and in the west water is as well--the question is, what will we be willing to give up for AI. That strikes me as a more serious problem than deep fakes and bots taking over the world.

[ötzi]

Listen to the Joe Rogan podcast with Tristan Harris (of the Social Dilemma), and you'll have absolutely no faith in those companies doing anything right or just for humanity since it all depends on their bottom line. They don't give a fuck.

100%. Government regulation is urgently needed.

And MTM- above I was referring to the percentage of evil/fake/untrustworthy AI-created video that will soon be infiltrating social media, not just general BS content which has been bad for some time. I mean, it has to become an existential threat to social media right? If the amount of fake and straight-up deceptive video hits a critical mass and people stop clicking on it, then they can't continue to serve ad content to the users. But there's really nothing that can be done to stop it...

It's definitely an existential threat to social media, but I don't really see a downside to that. And also to advertising in general. The only thing that going to be trustworthy is direct experience (or - maybe -words on paper), it will short circuit a lot of the "progress" in communications and media that's happened in the last 50 or more years. I'm all for that aspect of it.

[Dantheman]

It could go the other way if enough people find the fake content *more* compelling than real content, which I think is entirely plausible.