
Originally Posted by
Caligrown
One the one hand, folks are saying that hamas is a multi-state-sponsored military organization with decently high levels of sophistication, high levels of funding and material support, extremely high levels of violence and fanaticism, and actively steals and hordes most/all humanitarian aid that makes it into gaza through actual violence against palestinian civilians. On the other hand, folks are saying "At any given moment, Palestinians can choose to end their 100-year war against Israeli freedom, sovereignty, and equality. That alone would immediately bring the conflict to an end". Lets game theory this out: Palestinian civilians rise up and gather a few thousand strong to march through the streets demanding and end to hamas and the war. Do you think hamas just stands down, or do you think that they will either meet the protest with force, or go after the members of the protest later that night? Now, if israel sees a group of hamas meeting that protest with force, you dont think israel just bombs the everloving shit out of that protest to get that group of hamas, and then claims nearly all dead were hamas, or were acceptable casualties? Your average Ahmed in gaza is between a rock and hardplace. In a frying pan with fire all around. fucked if they do, fucked if they dont with no ability to change their situation as hamas and israel seem to be fairly happy with the status quo.
Bookmarks