Check Out Our Shop
Page 7 of 24 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 580

Thread: Chasing My Dream Daily Driver - The Heritage Lab FL105

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,488
    Quote Originally Posted by bern43 View Post
    That mismount has me paranoid! I just moved and haven't built up a bench yet. So no DIY mount for me. The shop I'm going to use is good, but I've used good shops before with bad results. Standard mount on the 185 FL105 is -11.5? Anything else I should tell the shop guy?
    Measure yourself, place tape, draw line on tape for midsole. Tell shop to mount on that line.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,702
    Quote Originally Posted by bern43 View Post
    That mismount has me paranoid! I just moved and haven't built up a bench yet. So no DIY mount for me. The shop I'm going to use is good, but I've used good shops before with bad results. Standard mount on the 185 FL105 is -11.5? Anything else I should tell the shop guy?
    Measure, mark, double check, and sharpie your line on the ski ... then bring em to the shop!

    Confirm the straight tape length (should be ~184.5cm), measure from tail to mark the center point (blue or silver sharpie). The measure back from that. Mark a solid full width line with a ruler where you want them to mount.

    I'd say -11.5 is the standard mount and -12.5 would be the "traditional/directional" mount. I don't think anyone is going forward on these to my knowledge.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,485
    Quote Originally Posted by bern43 View Post
    That mismount has me paranoid! I just moved and haven't built up a bench yet. So no DIY mount for me. The shop I'm going to use is good, but I've used good shops before with bad results. Standard mount on the 185 FL105 is -11.5? Anything else I should tell the shop guy?
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	0ED7E612-F03C-4C5E-9225-69378B53F678.jpg 
Views:	246 
Size:	1,021.7 KB 
ID:	480934

    Go see Chance @ the Starting Gate - we measured mm’s & put the boot on / off the topsheet several times to get the mount correct. We landed at 77cm from the tail - Just as Marshal suggested for me on the 178 w a 25.5 boot.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,488
    Quote Originally Posted by arild View Post
    I've gotten a couple of days on the 192s. One would think they're just cambered mini 113s, but as it happens, they really are different beasts.

    1) as turn willing as the LP105s, but more stable going straight, given the ludicrous sidecut on these things. I have exactly zero days on the 185s as of now, but willing to bet they are more apt for a direct comparison to the LP105s.

    2) willingness to plane to the surface is more pronounced in these than with the 113s, which really isn't much of a shock given their rocker/camber profile. So, more forgiving doing slower turns in knee deep pow, but not quite the chop destroyers going 60mph the 113s are.

    As I've divulged previously, I also have a pair of FL105s with the FL113 rocker profile. I'm very curious as to which profile is more universally good, but time will tell.

    They're awesome. My legs are fucked, though. Not enough preseason workout, combined with new boots makes for a sad day after.

    Cheers lads.



    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk
    Stoke!!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,702
    Just dropping you a quick note to say thanks: the FL105 is exactly as advertised, perhaps even a bit better. It rocks firm conditions but is a joy in soft snow, and absolutely has taken over the DD role in my quiver. I skied it for the first time a few days ago at Revelstoke, and the conditions were a mixed bag. Lots of soft snow off piste, deep in spots, with some firm and fast groomers that turned to spring-like slush down around mid-mountain. The FL105 handled everything well, although some of the snow was just too deep, probably more for my legs than the skis themselves. I turned duties over to my Moment Countach(s) the next three days, and they really shined in snow that became a little deeper each day.

    Well, we moved over to Lake Louise for the remaining three days of our trip, and the conditions there were very different: firm, boilerplate in places, but with lots of chalk to be found. I skied the FL105 each day and they were just killer. Absolutely crushed everything in their path, making transitions between varying snow mindless. Superb grip, and while I had no problem bending them into various turn shapes when necessary, man did they come alive when I opened them up and let them run. Just hip-dragging GS turns that were a blast.

    I was looking for something to take the place of my M102s, as I found them to ski and sound a bit harsh, and the FL105 is so much smoother and warmer. And, as an added bonus, none of the occasional hookiness I get with the M105 and their big shovels/shorter turn radius. The FL105 is a dream.

    I mounted my 178cm version 78cm from the tail, which on my pair comes in around -10.75. If I were to do it over again, I'd go -10.5, but I'm being really nitpicky. Oh, and as for construction, I hit a rock on Day 1 that would have sent most skis to their grave. The boys in the repair shop at the base of Revy were able to slap some ptex in a gaper of a hole and send me on my way. Absolutely built like a tank.

    Can't wait to find an opportunity to try out the FR110, but in the meantime I'm wondering if I need to pick up a spare pair of the FL105! They really are that good.

    Sorry for the long rant... thanks again!
    Thought folks might enjoy some more low-tide FL105 stoke

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    349
    Adding to the review as I got out on my fl105s today. East coast, mix of some freshly blown and ungroomed EC's finest, to some of that which has been polished to a fine sheen. I echo a lot of what was said above. First turn is always a tell for me, and it just felt good. At some point early on, I eventually stopped being suspicious of them and just skied. Anything and anywhere I felt comfortable and good on them. Two thumbs up. Fwiw, 184s mounted on the line.

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,839
    Quote Originally Posted by arild View Post
    As I've divulged previously, I also have a pair of FL105s with the FL113 rocker profile. I'm very curious as to which profile is more universally good, but time will tell.
    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk
    If any more 185 FL105s with the FL113 rocker ever get pressed by mistake, i'd be quite interested in that setup!

    My C105s have been great so far, I was worried about dropping down to a 178 but no concerns with stability yet and they're a joy on the uphill. Now we just need more snow so I can see how they do in 3D snow rather than windboard or dawn patrol groomer fitness skinning.
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    400
    Marshal or anyone with the BC105, how thick are the edges and the base? Apologies in advance if already answered prior, I couldn't find anything.

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by iriponsnow View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	0ED7E612-F03C-4C5E-9225-69378B53F678.jpg 
Views:	246 
Size:	1,021.7 KB 
ID:	480934

    Go see Chance @ the Starting Gate - we measured mm’s & put the boot on / off the topsheet several times to get the mount correct. We landed at 77cm from the tail - Just as Marshal suggested for me on the 178 w a 25.5 boot.

    Thats bullshit. Someone took down the boobie pictures.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,702
    Quote Originally Posted by Pins and Skins View Post
    Marshal or anyone with the BC105, how thick are the edges and the base? Apologies in advance if already answered prior, I couldn't find anything.
    Howdy, all HL skis are specced with 2mm edges and corresponding base material

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,950
    Unlocking the mysteries of the 192s...

    Just go fast through brush. Go fast through anything. They do not GAF. Ate shit about 100m below where this photo was taken, impressed myself by standing afterwards, shocked my son a bit.

    A bit dangerous, make you feel like Thor.

    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    276
    ^ The world needs a ski named "Mjölnir!"

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,485
    Ready to roll tomorrow in the deep….

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    57
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1704592202.205472.jpg 
Views:	205 
Size:	182.9 KB 
ID:	481869


    Got out on these today for the first time and holy smokes who knew skiing behind my 5 year old could be so fun. These things just wanna gooooooo!

    I usually try to time runs with my little ones where I let them go first and wait till they’re about 2/3 down before I let loose and meet at the bottom at the same time. Today I did a lot of kid dodging and waiting at the bottom and had a blast doing it. By far the funnest day of the season. Thanks!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whitefish
    Posts
    1,249
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1704605935.676925.jpg 
Views:	182 
Size:	220.8 KB 
ID:	481914

  16. #166
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by jdub1313 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1704592202.205472.jpg 
Views:	205 
Size:	182.9 KB 
ID:	481869


    Got out on these today for the first time and holy smokes who knew skiing behind my 5 year old could be so fun. These things just wanna gooooooo!

    I usually try to time runs with my little ones where I let them go first and wait till they’re about 2/3 down before I let loose and meet at the bottom at the same time. Today I did a lot of kid dodging and waiting at the bottom and had a blast doing it. By far the funnest day of the season. Thanks!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Jdub1313, love the feedback, assume those are the 105’s? Sick set up, looking forward to jumping on those sticks!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,485
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5105.jpg 
Views:	188 
Size:	827.9 KB 
ID:	481938

    Shots from the wild. Soooo smooth.

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,702
    Drove up to Vermont yesterday to meet an old buddy, and I had no idea what to expect. I knew it would be firm, but because I also thought I might encounter a bit of refrozen crud, rather than step into a narrower or lighter offering, I again trusted the FL105.

    Man, what a good decision. The surface ran the gamut of hardpack, boilerplate, and good ol' New England ice to deep, deep piles of sugar. The FL105 again impressed with its ability to transition between these conditions, and did so with aplomb. Controllable and smooth -- even on iced-over snowmobile tracks -- and unflappable in those situations where going straight and letting them run was the only option.

    I can't imagine a more versatile ski, and I can promise they will be the first ski in my bag on every trip.
    Just thought to share more reviews on these as they come in.

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    400
    Marshal, any plans to make the FL105 with the BC105 shape, a R105 if you will?

    I know arild has a proto from previous posts, but didn't know if you have plans to roll out to the masses

  20. #170
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,452
    I will be mounting soon:

    185 FL185
    186 R110
    175 R87

    Skis I like:

    MX98
    Monster 108
    Lhasa Pow
    Kusala Pow
    202 Lotus 138 R2

    What say you, Marshal?

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,702
    Quote Originally Posted by Pins and Skins View Post
    Marshal, any plans to make the FL105 with the BC105 shape, a R105 if you will?

    I know arild has a proto from previous posts, but didn't know if you have plans to roll out to the masses
    Stay tuned

  22. #172
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,702
    Quote Originally Posted by pfluffenmeister View Post
    Mount Q
    My Recs:

    185 FL185: -11.5 (81 from tail) for a little more all arounder, or -12.5 (80 from tail) for MX98/Monster108 level smashing
    187 R110: -8cm (85.5 from tail)
    175 R87: On the faint line pressed into the topsheet (approx -12.5 or 75 from tail)

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    400
    Oh god, just take my money now, I'll be first in line if you make a 178cm length


    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    Stay tuned

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,485
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5117.jpeg 
Views:	164 
Size:	226.7 KB 
ID:	482312

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5124.jpg 
Views:	188 
Size:	457.0 KB 
ID:	482313

    Post storm day fun on the new DD champ.

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,702

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •