Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 116

Thread: Rant here about proposed mountain “improvements”

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sun Peaks Resort
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by SnakeMagnet View Post
    The LL expansion that's ongoing is a mixed bag but they sure as shit have their priorities a bit messed. Yeah WestBowl was an easy sell to open first as all the infrastructure is already there and I appreciate patrol keeping idiots from slabbing the bowl before its ready to go, but they've overdone it with the trimming. Far too nicely manicured trees; in its "oly" zone especially, when all that really needed doing was clearing all the bushes that clog the lanes of travel. With the aspect and elevation clearing that much cover turns the snow to shit much faster. And kills the 'lift-accessed bc' vibe it had in its pre-open/1st year; it really felt like you were exploring trying to pick a line through the bottom half of outback eg.

    Maybe the upper juniper lift will fix the glaring problem of the base-bottlenecking, but that's been a problem ever since oly and giant got ripped out and that lift's about 20 years late to the party. Does nothing to fix the awkward traverse to get to the former eagle chair zone either. Probably going to delay that for a bunch of mediocre angle south-facing shit on the ridge first too.

    And they got rid of elevator shaft to get the land rights. I get it, 40 minute hike, hardly used. But damn sucks to lose any inbounds terrain specially in a season like this.

    --

    And meanwhile i'm just waiting for anything to get started at Fortress or Castle..
    Castle is owned by a group of 125 associates, (including the guy who plows the parking lot, last time I was there) and they have no plans for big development and would rather keep things the way they are---Castle the anti-Whistler. That was a while ago, so things could have changed but still, I like to tell people that Castle is the greatest mountain in North America that you have never heard of.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,527
    Quote Originally Posted by jackstraw View Post
    Yeah but, hold on! So would they close Spacewalk and ZeroG? That would be an fn travesty!
    Wow. Yep. Have to.

    It’ll be like Alta zero. Saw patrol opening that on the ride up a few years ago. Grabbed two laps before they shut it down.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    none
    Posts
    8,815
    Aspen’s putting in a lift, up the most popular slack country. It’s the most snow sure area on the hill and will help early/ low snow seasons.

    I’m ok with the expansion, even though I won’t be able to keep my snowmobile there anymore.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,486
    I want to rant about my mountains only investment in infrastructure in the last 10 years. They replaced a „problem“ rope tow with a magic carpet. Massive concrete tunnel built for said conveyor belt. 2 million later and it’s quicker to just take off your skis and walk 3 minutes and avoid the carpet…. Not to mention the rope tow was unmanned and the new tunnel takes some poor sap to sit in the bunker and man it!!

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    335
    Quote Originally Posted by DanoT View Post
    Castle is owned by a group of 125 associates, (including the guy who plows the parking lot, last time I was there) and they have no plans for big development and would rather keep things the way they are---Castle the anti-Whistler. That was a while ago, so things could have changed but still, I like to tell people that Castle is the greatest mountain in North America that you have never heard of.
    There's the alpine tbar, north bowl chair, lift-access haig ridge that have been master planned for a while now..

    Just things that would greatly improve the 'oops too windy 70% of the resort is closed' problem.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Idaho
    Posts
    1,009
    This is why they don’t build new ski areas, too many fucking cry babies.
    Core Shot is the Skidog of JH.
    Hunting kicks ass.
    Chicks dig Labs.
    I'll keep my job, my money and my guns and you can keep the change.
    From my cold dead hands.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,875
    Quote Originally Posted by thebirdhunter View Post
    This is why they don’t build new ski areas, too many fucking cry babies.
    Core Shot is the Skidog of JH.
    This is the funniest and truest thing that you’ve ever posted.




    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    23,805
    Until now I had no idea CS even skied let alone was a JH local.
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,225
    Quote Originally Posted by raisingarizona13 View Post
    And you're still doing trail work for fun? That's rad and we are definitely in the same weirdo trail nerd club!

    I agree tho, different world and yeah, it does suck! Human breeding has been a little out of control.

    If the climate science is right we ain't seen nuthin yet though unfortunately.
    Oh, I completely phucked in the head. Using leverage to move boulders is addictive. I stay awake at night thinking about how to make the line.

    Core- I never saw alta 0 open. Plake showed up in '89 and poached it. Horrible tracks!...and he was given all kinds of shit about it, but safe...why he's still around. He is calculated in unknown territory, like all great skiers.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Behind the Potato Curtain
    Posts
    4,068
    I chatted briefly about this type of stuff with our District Ranger a year or so ago and he said that the feds have directed the FS to be friendly to expansion within reason in order to promote growth within existing ski resorts/permitted areas rather than promote new areas trying to establish. The devil you know vs the devil you don't kind of thing I guess.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,373
    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    Wow. Yep. Have to.

    It’ll be like Alta zero. Saw patrol opening that on the ride up a few years ago. Grabbed two laps before they shut it down.
    I'm not completely sure about that. It could be done but it probably wouldn't be top priority.

    I've skid Alta Zero probably 3 or 4 dozen times and it being roped off as closed was one of it's finest attributes imo.

    When it was officially opened it skied like shit anyways after one or two people sideslipped up to the Waterfall drop and around it.

    So leave em closed, the right people will still ski them and patrol will throw a bomb in there every now and then and most will look the other way. Win win really.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,373
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    The biggest gripe I have is that every time my local mountain (whitefish) installs a new lift, they put it *slightly* in the wrong spot. Over the last decade, they've installed / moved 5 lifts. 4 out of 5 of them require uphill skating at either the top or the bottom (or both). And that'd be excusable if the terrain dictated the lift placement, but in every case it doesn't. And in 1 case, the dumb lift placement actually creates a super dangerous intersection completely unnecessarily. If the lift was one tower shorter, there'd be no uphill skating off the exit ramp, there'd be no dangerous intersection, and there'd be no diminishment of access from the lift.

    They also just installed a brand new, 10 million dollar 6 pack, which no one uses because it stops about 100 feet short of where it needs to go. And since it stops short, it accesses about 40% of the hill instead of 80%. Although I have mixed feelings about that one since I don't mind hiking the last 100 feet, and there's never a lift line at that lift, so that's nice. But that new chair breaks down so often that even the tourists have started calling it "The Gambler."
    I lived up there for the winter of 94-95 so I kind of keep up with the ski areas expansions and new lift installments and yeah, they sure seem like strange decisions. They are all just a little off from where they'd actually make sense.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,775
    Quote Originally Posted by raisingarizona13 View Post
    I lived up there for the winter of 94-95 so I kind of keep up with the ski areas expansions and new lift installments and yeah, they sure seem like strange decisions. They are all just a little off from where they'd actually make sense.
    They seem to have a "why do it right when we can do it wrong for 80% of the price" kind of attitude.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,933
    Luckily I live in Fernie, ski every day and I don't have to worry about "expansion" and/or "improvements" because they will never happen.
    what's orange and looks good on hippies?
    fire

    rails are for trains
    If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for problems caused by the government I'd be a rich fat film maker in a baseball hat.

    www.theguideshut.ca

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,501
    Not sure I track any of the outrage over this lift or any confusion over mid-winter boundaries. In the article, this is the plan:

    The southern lift proposed in Cody Bowl, a handle tow that would ascend Powder Eights, would be operational only in the spring, when the rest of the resort closes. It would be used for spring ski and snowboard camps in the high elevations where snow persists longer.

    If that sticks, do people really think JH is going to light money on fire trying to control this whole zone all winter? I'd guess they'll likely find a way to just keep the bc boundaries as they are now, and only deal Cody once they want to get the lift spinning. In the spring. When, I would also guess, CS won't be skiing there anyways.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,373
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    They seem to have a "why do it right when we can do it wrong for 80% of the price" kind of attitude.
    It's really weird.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,922
    Lots of locals here are pissed about the boundary expansion into golf course and part of Fish Creek, and ski patrol seems to be more than a bit concerned. Alterra will market the shit out of it, because once it opens next year, Steamboat will now be the second largest resort in CO next to Vail.

    The golf course is already getting bumped out from folks following tracks, they have no idea where they are going once they get to the choke, don't understand the double-fall line. I think it will be chaos the first season or two once officially open. Lots of folk speculating that rescues will be even more commonplace in the canyon as the new boundary line will be even closer to consequential terrain. Even by increasing avalanche mitigation, the cliffs and boulder field will remain. People gonna get suckered.

    I have no control over what will happen at the resort, the last shred of it's soul flew the coop about 5 years ago once Ikon came to the scene, so no sense in getting mad at something one cannot control. It could, in theory, spread the people out even more. I like to think more of the inbounds goods will be more preserved as people flock to Pioneer side. Wishful thinking I guess.

    I will be bummed about losing the yurt at the top of Pony, though. A new patrol shack and bathrooms will take it's place.

    Thunderhead and Morningside lifts both need to be 6-packs and I'm all for that if they get around to it. Thunderhead lift got punked thanks to the new beginner gondy. The gapes all filter down to T-head now and it stops all the time. Harder to get front-side laps now when rest of mountain is on wind-hold.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,373
    Quote Originally Posted by waxman View Post
    Luckily I live in Fernie, ski every day and I don't have to worry about "expansion" and/or "improvements" because they will never happen.
    Fernie has expended massively since the early 90's.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,373
    Quote Originally Posted by kathleenturneroverdrive View Post
    Not sure I track any of the outrage over this lift or any confusion over mid-winter boundaries. In the article, this is the plan:

    The southern lift proposed in Cody Bowl, a handle tow that would ascend Powder Eights, would be operational only in the spring, when the rest of the resort closes. It would be used for spring ski and snowboard camps in the high elevations where snow persists longer.

    If that sticks, do people really think JH is going to light money on fire trying to control this whole zone all winter? I'd guess they'll likely find a way to just keep the bc boundaries as they are now, and only deal Cody once they want to get the lift spinning. In the spring. When, I would also guess, CS won't be skiing there anyways.
    That surface lift on the 8's is just the tip of the iceberg. I'm guessing that they left out the big plans for the RS/GR areas to hopefully simmer the local uproar. They aren't going to shove it straight in without at least spitting on it ya know.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Jax View Post
    <snip>
    Morningside lifts both need to be 6-packs
    No.

    Leave Morningside lift as a tourist trap.

    Quicker to just hike to the weather station... but apparently nobody knows this any more.


  21. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    23,805
    I understand all the hand wringing but these are ski areas and are in business to provide a product, as soulless as that sounds it is reality.

    If you choose to ride lifts to access side country/back country and your area expands into that terrain you can vote with your wallet or your feet.
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,501
    Quote Originally Posted by raisingarizona13 View Post
    That surface lift on the 8's is just the tip of the iceberg. I'm guessing that they left out the big plans for the RS/GR areas to hopefully simmer the local uproar. They aren't going to shove it straight in without at least spitting on it ya know.
    Well, now you're reeeeaaaaally getting into Coreshot conspiracy theory territory

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,373
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    No.

    Leave Morningside lift as a tourist trap.

    Quicker to just hike to the weather station... but apparently nobody knows this any more.

    I member.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,145
    Quote Originally Posted by raisingarizona13 View Post
    I member.
    I mean... it's actually kind of nice that nobody knows it's quicker, 'cause this way I'm not getting in anyone's way, except for the beaters that take Morningside then come down back down the ridge to Buddy's.

    My kids and my buddies that don't 'member have now been indoctrinated.


  25. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,373
    The hike. From L to R, Ray V, Chris V, Myself, Mike Tierney., Kate, and Joe Vasta.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9CE46C31-F791-4782-B6F1-108166456759_1_201_a.jpg 
Views:	181 
Size:	564.0 KB 
ID:	449102
    Vasta jumps into Fish Creek Canyon.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1460AD78-36D3-466B-85D0-A5A4FE494A56_1_201_a.jpg 
Views:	91 
Size:	578.9 KB 
ID:	449103
    Bush Rock, Gate D.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	0D59D10E-9A4B-463A-A83C-5D2A89C6921D_1_201_a.jpg 
Views:	94 
Size:	565.1 KB 
ID:	449105
    Chris, Joe and Mike in the old gondola.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A9FE4D08-9097-4D3E-813F-700E99986FEA_1_201_a.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	498.8 KB 
ID:	449106
    Johnny Fro on Thunderhead.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2C03F9F0-AA43-432D-AECC-5A010211B9FD_1_201_a.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	434.0 KB 
ID:	449107
    Bush Rock, Gate D.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	29B4649F-F2CA-4DCC-B1F9-F3C8467F17FD_1_201_a.jpg 
Views:	83 
Size:	442.4 KB 
ID:	449109
    Mr. Lotz gets stinky in Rancid Tuna.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F99ABD6C-51B5-49A5-AF0D-3230429145E7_1_201_a.jpg 
Views:	89 
Size:	682.4 KB 
ID:	449108
    dirtbag, not a dentist

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •