Can anyone compare the Faction Prodigy 2.0 to the Icelantic Nomad/Maiden?

[EWG]

My lovely wife has been skiing Prodigy Ws (same as 2.0s) for a few years and loves them. She picked up a pair of Maiden 101s (close to the same as Nomad 105s) this year and is not really getting along with them. I’m struggling to understand what she is describing the differences to be.

Has anyone skied both - or even one - of these and can describe them? I’ve never skied either. Mens versions are fine. I’m thinking the prodigy is more directional, which she’s used to, and the icelantic are more progressive, which might be what is throwing her. That said, the icelantic recommended mount point is not at all centered so I’m not sure.

Thoughts?

[mattyTru]

The Icelantics are softer and have less camber I believe. I found the Prodigys to be a little bit more stable. Very intuitive to ski overall. The Icelantics are really easy to ski but don't give you very much backbone. They have similar mount points