Big Mountain Powder Chargers - Heritage Lab C113 and FL113 - Dedicated Thread

[sf]

Arild; as I skied my R105s last weekend I imagined a R113 would be really cool.

Almost same ski as the 105s, perhaps a tiny bit more rise in the tail, a 8,5 flex. And 27-28m TR.

Obviously a different ski than a true FL114 v2, but would perhaps sell more? But also be overlapping with RC116…

[arild]

Arild; as I skied my R105s last weekend I imagined a R113 would be really cool.

Almost same ski as the 105s, perhaps a tiny bit more rise in the tail, a 8,5 flex. And 27-28m TR.

Marshal (probably)has something in the works resembling that. Wait, wtf am I saying? That's basically the rc116.

Sent fra min Pixel 8 Pro via Tapatalk

[arild]

The v2 I've never drawn even once is 133/111/122. Also never drawn is that the sidecut and tapers have been getting makeovers.

Sent fra min Pixel 8 Pro via Tapatalk

[sf]

Marshal (probably)has something in the works resembling that. Wait, wtf am I saying? That's basically the rc116.

Sent fra min Pixel 8 Pro via Tapatalk

Yeah, probably. Just something with that r105 that worked for me. Either the ski, the tune or the mount point (or all) really felt so intuitive

[arild]

Yeah, probably. Just something with that r105 that worked for me. Either the ski, the tune or the mount point (or all) really felt so intuitive

I can see what you mean. If there ever was a more soft snow oriented r105, the 116 is it. Nevermind the radius; it's decidedly quicker, with a shorter EE and more tail taper, than the R105s. [emoji846]

Sent fra min Pixel 8 Pro via Tapatalk

[MagnificentUnicorn]

[emoji638]][emoji640][emoji639]][emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji638][emoji639][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]][emoji638]]Arild; as I skied my R[emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]s last weekend I imagined a R[emoji637][emoji637][emoji639] would be really cool.

Almost same ski as the [emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]s, perhaps a tiny bit more rise in the tail, a [emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]],[emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]] flex. And [emoji638][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji639]]-[emoji638][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]]m TR.

Obviously a different ski than a true FL[emoji637][emoji637][emoji640] v[emoji638], but would perhaps sell more? But also be overlapping with RC[emoji637][emoji637][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]…

You’re kinda describing the [emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji637]]][emoji640] R [emoji637][emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]]


Sent from my iPhone using [emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji640][emoji638][emoji638][emoji638]]TGR Forums