Most boots with tech inserts and walk mode don’t have adjustable cuffs. What kind of boots did you get?
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
It's more about why you use a footbed, why you use sole canting, and the order of operations.
Footbeds and sole canting do different things and for different reasons. Yes, a footbed will reposition the ankle & the knee in relation to the hip, but that's not why we use footbeds. Footbeds create the proper interface between the flexible foot and the rigid ski boot, properly supporting the foot, holding it in the correct position inside the ski boot. Sole canting aligns the ankle, the knee, and the hip in order to have better balance and ultimately more efficient control of the ski. Initiating a turn takes less effort. More power is directed to the ski, and the skier has an easier time staying balanced & centered from turn to turn.
In order to properly sole cant a boot, you need a footbed to properly position the foot & ankle inside the boot. Without doing that, your ankle will be in the wrong spot, and so will your knee and you will be incorrectly sole canting the boot. So, get a proper footbed first, then do sole canting (among other things) after.
The general order of operations is usually this:
1. proper footbed
2. fitting of the shell & liner
3. adjusting forward lean
4. cuff alignment
5. sole canting
I'm a below average skier...Green Mountain Orthotics did a full workup on me back in 2004. I was skiing in plug boots back then so maybe that changes things.
I have horribly fallen arches and pronate to the point I wear out the heels of shoes on the sides, not the back. First thing GMOL did was fix the pronation with custom, posted foot beds. Then they had me go ski. Life changing difference.
They brought me back in and found that my right knee was different from my left knee (can't even remember what they said) and added a shim in the cuff of my boot to address that. Then they had me go out and ski. Less dramatic difference but I noticed that my left and right turns were much more similar.
Last thing they did was assess the need for canting. Only needed canting on the right boot. They shaved the boot sole. It was only 0.5* and to be honest, I couldn't tell the difference. I stopped skiing in those boots in 2014 and transitioned to touring boots. Have always had custom footbeds but never went back to canting. Now, my right knee is worn out and will likely need to be replaced in the next 2-3 years. Correlation vs. causation? Who knows....?
yeah ok but my point would probably be that in spite of flatfoot/ pronating badly/ knees touching I have managed to fix my self up with foot beds
so maybe not all skiers need canting, i don't hear about the average skier canting anything
But the op who does not sound like a plugboot wearing WC skier buys new boots and gets canting with no foot beds ... maybe something back wards there ?
and we will leave it at that
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
Agreed that something seems off with the OP's order of operations. Sole canting is not that common outside of racing and it's mainly found at race-oriented shops.. It requires a lot of training and VERY expensive machines for a shop to invest in. Almost everyone can benefit from sole canting, but since we learn to live with our imbalances and weirdnesses, most people just keep on skiing. But, it is like having highly tuned suspension and a very dialed bike fit - going back to normal once the fancy stuff has been done can be a disappointing change. Outside of racing, sole canting can definitely help mere mortals by alleviate knee pain, hip pain, etc. It can be a cure for pain that isn't remedied by a custom footbed and the right boot.
No matter where you go, there you are. - BB
Not everyone needs canting, but everyone does benefit from a good boot set up. A proper footbed, cuff alignment and fore aft balance can go a long ways.
It is unfortunate that stance based boot fitting is more common in the race world than the regular world. The average WC Athlete is not average at all. They are elite athletes, with carefully constructed training regimens and every possible effort goes into making sure their equipment is perfectly tailored to their needs.
The average skier is just that, average. Well, maybe not here on TGR, as some of you are obviously quite special.
But the average skier has a much bigger envelope of potential improvement than the average elite racer.
They stand to benefit as much or more than someone who is already really good.
Not only this, but elite athletes are already fortunate to be fairly well aligned naturally, part of the reason they are elite
Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk
yeah i can agree with this ^^
not common/ racers only/ by racing oriented shops where someone knows WTF they are doing/ the last of 5 things you do
no one has ever told me they got their boots ground and I'm sure i would have heard but its not common around here and we have lots of racers
I think i know a guy in calgary only 13hrs away who could do it but my sense is that the snow doesnt suck enough here to bother with such a thing
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
be it skiing or f'tba/ gymnastics/ or especaily hockey
a lot of the elite athelete experiance is not about boot cant
its about how much money ( > 5 figures) their parents can thro at it
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
Let the thread drift begin... lol
I had the conversation about naturally well aligned wc level racers with a bootfitter for elite wc racers a number of years ago. He said that successful European racers tended toward better natural alignment because at that time European junior racing didn't spend much effort on alignment whereas the US racers did more so. Not sure if that was entirely accurate, but interesting.
As for cash support, I have no idea how anyone affords putting their kids through a ski racing career. The expense is massive.
Sent from my SM-S908U1 using Tapatalk
Last edited by skinipenem; 10-10-2022 at 09:17 AM.
No matter where you go, there you are. - BB
zero idea who these ^^^^ people are let alone remember them,
google soze group and it could be Toronto could be richmond
which are not really my back yard
I think lou in calgary might do that stuff
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
I am only familiar with cunting
...up threads on TGR.
Most people don’t need canting, some who don’t need it could still benefit from it. People who need it probably won’t end up on the World Cup.
I suspect most the naysayers on the benefits of stance alignment:
1- Have never been assessed by an experienced bootfitter with the correct tools to actually perform this modification.
and/or
2- Ski in a boot with improved walk ability (and perhaps pin-tech bindings) that couldn’t be properly planed and routed to begin with, under the guise of skiing a “side country” zone once or twice a season.
Just a hunch, and I’ve certainly been wrong before.
Edit: To O.P. - 5 degrees is A LOT. 2 degrees is a lot. Get a second opinion on that assessment. Honestly, many grindable boots couldn’t handle 5 degrees of correction to begin with.
Bookmarks