Check Out Our Shop
Page 30 of 49 FirstFirst ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... LastLast
Results 726 to 750 of 1219

Thread: The Black Crows thread

  1. #726
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    FR&CH
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by halliday View Post
    Id be concerned with a touring exclusive ski weight difference of 120 grams but will you be using the Corvus as a touring ski or more of a ram rod type ski?
    It was a 120g difference between 2 skis of the same pair. I wanted to use them for what you’re calling « sidecountry » with some ATK R12.

    I took some BMX 105 instead for that, which are heavier btw.

    I don’t mind the weight being heavier than spec I mind one ski being so much heavier than the other one and BC not giving a shit about it.

  2. #727
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    PDX
    Posts
    405
    Quote Originally Posted by stuntmanbo View Post
    It was a 120g difference between 2 skis of the same pair. I wanted to use them for what you’re calling « sidecountry » with some ATK R12.

    I took some BMX 105 instead for that, which are heavier btw.

    I don’t mind the weight being heavier than spec I mind one ski being so much heavier than the other one and BC not giving a shit about it.
    I had the same issue with some Atris. There’s a thread on it somewhere, but the short version is 5% or so weight variability within a pair of skis is considered within tolerance for resort oriented skis. Touring specific skis should have a tighter tolerance. If comparative weights are important to you, go to the shop with a scale. I did that for a pair of current version Atris and found a pair that were within 25g of each other and slightly lighter than published weight. I use those skis exclusively for touring. YMMV.

  3. #728
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,022
    Quote Originally Posted by stuntmanbo View Post
    It was a 120g difference between 2 skis of the same pair. I wanted to use them for what you’re calling « sidecountry » with some ATK R12.

    I took some BMX 105 instead for that, which are heavier btw.

    I don’t mind the weight being heavier than spec I mind one ski being so much heavier than the other one and BC not giving a shit about it.
    Dealing with gear manufacturers as an unhappy customer is sometimes frustrating when you hear their response to your problem. At lest the retailer took them back and got you headed in the right direction. +1

  4. #729
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by stuntmanbo View Post
    It was a 120g difference between 2 skis of the same pair. I wanted to use them for what you’re calling « sidecountry » with some ATK R12.

    I took some BMX 105 instead for that, which are heavier btw.

    I don’t mind the weight being heavier than spec I mind one ski being so much heavier than the other one and BC not giving a shit about it.

    interesting side country choice paired with techs. I’d be headed towards a Atris.

  5. #730
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    You guys weigh your skis?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  6. #731
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    You guys weigh your skis?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    it’s kinda like penis measuring for adults.

  7. #732
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    120 grams is like two tennis balls, or 20 quarters.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #733
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    For science…

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	90842BF9-EEBB-4F27-8940-E8A4889BA731.jpg 
Views:	163 
Size:	760.9 KB 
ID:	475082
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	87A694B1-6AA1-4E1E-A00F-FE2405DE14DB.jpg 
Views:	141 
Size:	823.9 KB 
ID:	475083

    both 12.5 pounds. Whew. Good thing.

  9. #734
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,022
    ^^That was close...

  10. #735
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    My xt3 140 is a half pound lighter per boot apparently. So that was a fun experiment.

  11. #736
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,933
    Quote Originally Posted by SoVT Joey View Post
    For science…

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	90842BF9-EEBB-4F27-8940-E8A4889BA731.jpg 
Views:	163 
Size:	760.9 KB 
ID:	475082
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	87A694B1-6AA1-4E1E-A00F-FE2405DE14DB.jpg 
Views:	141 
Size:	823.9 KB 
ID:	475083

    both 12.5 pounds. Whew. Good thing.
    nice boots make up for any weight difference
    what's orange and looks good on hippies?
    fire

    rails are for trains
    If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for problems caused by the government I'd be a rich fat film maker in a baseball hat.

    www.theguideshut.ca

  12. #737
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    140
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3465.jpg 
Views:	142 
Size:	434.9 KB 
ID:	476166
    Got the Corvus’s mounted up. Have them next to my kid’s and my Animas. They ended up 7mm behind the line to best deal with existing holes. Got them out today for the first time, and holy fuck I’m impressed. Not exactly the conditions these were meant for. Two runs of man made groomed snow that was mostly scraped up by the time I got up this afternoon. However, once I realized I needed to just treat them more like a GS race ski and ignore the rocker, they really came alive. They carve really well, and not just for a 107 wide full rockered ski. They felt really good on edge and plowing through the scraped up groomer granule piles. At the same time, easy to transfer from a carve to smear. Since the trails were crowded being only two runs open, I probably only got them up to about 40mph, but they felt really stable and I know they can go a lot faster. And with the rocker, they are super easy to make sliding shorter turns. Can’t wait for more appropriate conditions. Anyway, thanks to everyone on this forum who talked this ski up enough to convince me to try them out.

    edit: extra thoughts: As MagnificentUnicorn compared it to the Invictus, I’d agree, but I’ll add I think the Corvus is a better carver despite the full rocker. Largely, I’d give credit to the shorter turning radius stated 21m vs 26.5m and the longer traditional sidewalls vs cap past underfoot on the Invictus. Also, the Corvus is much easier to pivot and smear with that rocker. However, you have to really know how to get the Corvus on edge to take advantage of its carving. I could see someone who isn’t yet capable of good edge angles struggling to engage the carving mode of this ski. More traditional camber skis, like the Invictus was (and even when I had almost no camber left from breaking those in, the still had more flat area before any rocker kicked in), are easier to get an edge to bite. The ski probably only has about 90cm of flat camber under foot before the rocker kicks in. If you aren’t comfortable getting your hips inside the turn (more like a racer) and mostly angulate at knees to create edge angles (probably like 80% of ski instructors) I think you’d miss out on what this ski does, at least in terms of carving. Maybe that’s why this ski has such polarizing reviews? Of course, these are just my first impressions as I was only on them for a few hours. Yet, when I can get a wider ski to carve like that, I get really excited, especially when I can do some effortless medium slide turns effortlessly in addition to more powerful carves. The carving capabilities reminded me more of my Bonafides or Stockli SR 105s, which is high praise as I really like both of those.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_3465.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	434.1 KB 
ID:	476165  
    Last edited by whambat; 11-14-2023 at 09:39 AM.

  13. #738
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    70
    whambat what brake size pivot is this on the Corvus?

  14. #739
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2,022
    Usually people will run a 115 brake on that ski.

  15. #740
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Qilimanjaro View Post
    whambat what brake size pivot is this on the Corvus?
    It’s a 115.

  16. #741
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by whambat View Post

    edit: extra thoughts: As MagnificentUnicorn compared it to the Invictus, I’d agree, but I’ll add I think the Corvus is a better carver despite the full rocker. Largely, I’d give credit to the shorter turning radius stated 21m vs 26.5m and the longer traditional sidewalls vs cap past underfoot on the Invictus. Also, the Corvus is much easier to pivot and smear with that rocker. However, you have to really know how to get the Corvus on edge to take advantage of its carving. I could see someone who isn’t yet capable of good edge angles struggling to engage the carving mode of this ski. More traditional camber skis, like the Invictus was (and even when I had almost no camber left from breaking those in, the still had more flat area before any rocker kicked in), are easier to get an edge to bite. The ski probably only has about 90cm of flat camber under foot before the rocker kicks in. If you aren’t comfortable getting your hips inside the turn (more like a racer) and mostly angulate at knees to create edge angles (probably like 80% of ski instructors) I think you’d miss out on what this ski does, at least in terms of carving. Maybe that’s why this ski has such polarizing reviews? Of course, these are just my first impressions as I was only on them for a few hours. Yet, when I can get a wider ski to carve like that, I get really excited, especially when I can do some effortless medium slide turns effortlessly in addition to more powerful carves. The carving capabilities reminded me more of my Bonafides or Stockli SR 105s, which is high praise as I really like both of those.
    you nailed that.

  17. #742
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Deep in the heart of....
    Posts
    823
    Well you definitely convinced me to mount. I'm gonna pull my pivots off my captis and put them on the corvus once I order the things i need form slidewright.

  18. #743
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,485
    I have to concur. The Corvus defies logic…. So I bought another pair.

    I’m not a fan of being head of the line, for me.

  19. #744
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,485
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4767.jpg 
Views:	110 
Size:	587.2 KB 
ID:	476288


    ^fuq u Joey

  20. #745
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Can/USA
    Posts
    1,787
    2022 Nocta ( white with orange chevrons). Where we mounting these?? On the line?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #746
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,880
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandbox View Post
    2022 Nocta ( white with orange chevrons). Where we mounting these?? On the line?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Mounted my 185s OTL when I had them. Loved them there.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #747
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandbox View Post
    2022 Nocta ( white with orange chevrons). Where we mounting these?? On the line?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

    what length nocta, how tall are you and what do you weigh

  23. #748
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Can/USA
    Posts
    1,787
    Quote Originally Posted by SoVT Joey View Post
    what length nocta, how tall are you and what do you weigh
    185, 5’11” 180


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  24. #749
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandbox View Post
    185, 5’11” 180


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

    im the same size. Got a 185 at first. And it was tough. I would possibly go +1 cause I notice it felt short on the tail but had plenty of float. I like my 190 at our size a lot more. On the line. Skis tight shit so well. And still allows hammering open shit at high speed

  25. #750
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Can/USA
    Posts
    1,787
    Quote Originally Posted by SoVT Joey View Post
    im the same size. Got a 185 at first. And it was tough. I would possibly go +1 cause I notice it felt short on the tail but had plenty of float. I like my 190 at our size a lot more. On the line. Skis tight shit so well. And still allows hammering open shit at high speed
    Hmmmm you are the BC whisperer, keeper, aviculturist…. Would plus 1 give a touch more versatility?? Ability to get back to the lifts?

    Currently in the quicker have a camox, Corvus and now these to go with a K2 marksmen and OG bentchetler.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •