
Originally Posted by
whambat
edit: extra thoughts: As MagnificentUnicorn compared it to the Invictus, I’d agree, but I’ll add I think the Corvus is a better carver despite the full rocker. Largely, I’d give credit to the shorter turning radius stated 21m vs 26.5m and the longer traditional sidewalls vs cap past underfoot on the Invictus. Also, the Corvus is much easier to pivot and smear with that rocker. However, you have to really know how to get the Corvus on edge to take advantage of its carving. I could see someone who isn’t yet capable of good edge angles struggling to engage the carving mode of this ski. More traditional camber skis, like the Invictus was (and even when I had almost no camber left from breaking those in, the still had more flat area before any rocker kicked in), are easier to get an edge to bite. The ski probably only has about 90cm of flat camber under foot before the rocker kicks in. If you aren’t comfortable getting your hips inside the turn (more like a racer) and mostly angulate at knees to create edge angles (probably like 80% of ski instructors) I think you’d miss out on what this ski does, at least in terms of carving. Maybe that’s why this ski has such polarizing reviews? Of course, these are just my first impressions as I was only on them for a few hours. Yet, when I can get a wider ski to carve like that, I get really excited, especially when I can do some effortless medium slide turns effortlessly in addition to more powerful carves. The carving capabilities reminded me more of my Bonafides or Stockli SR 105s, which is high praise as I really like both of those.
Bookmarks