Check Out Our Shop
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 174

Thread: Tecnica ZeroG Peak - another light boot for 2022 - 3

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,939
    I've held them/played with them, but haven't worn them.

    Impressively light for how burly all the parts felt. Didn't feel flimsy or plastic-y like some other boots in that category feel. The Technica/industry folks who were "testing" them had really good things to say about their touring that day. I don't really tour for the distances and vertical this boot would be useful for, but having sold a lot of boots in this category I can tell that this boot is going to be a winner.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Summit Park UT
    Posts
    1,158
    Anyone speak (understand) German 😂? In the little bit that's written they call the flex "approx 130" which is pretty surprising..

    https://www.sport65.de/Shop/Wintersp...:12_10_56.html

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,509
    Quote Originally Posted by wilcox510 View Post
    Anyone speak (understand) German ��? In the little bit that's written they call the flex "approx 130" which is pretty surprising..

    https://www.sport65.de/Shop/Wintersp...:12_10_56.html
    Pretty surprising in English, too.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,177
    All boots are a 130

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    399
    We have a pair of proto 26.5s. Not my size, but disappointed to hear from folks that can fit that the instep is much higher than the zgtp. They don't seem anywhere near a 130, but I haven't even had them on my foot, and these are protos so who knows what's changed

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    617
    Look, there is no way they are a 130, okay? This reminds me of the Dalbello Quantum thread from last year. I think people get excited when their favorite beef boot mf'er makes a light boot, but it's just materials, and if one characteristic is set (weight) then there's only so much that can be done elsewhere (downhill performance).

    The other thing that can be modified is fit, so IMO if this skis as well as leading 1 KG boots like the F1 LT but fits a different population, it's a win.

    Happy to be proven wrong...

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    399

    Tecnica ZeroG Peak - another light boot for 2022 - 3

    It’s a rescaling. Cochise Pros are now a 197.5 flex.

    Edit: also read somewhere that there’s a big difference in flex between the carbon and non-carbon models, I imagine by (marketing) design. it probably won’t be like the difference between Vulcan/Mercury where carbon adds a little lateral stiffness and a lot of bling factor.

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by CirqueScaler View Post
    The other thing that can be modified is fit, so IMO if this skis as well as leading 1 KG boots like the F1 LT but fits a different population, it's a win.
    Couldn't agree more. As much as I'd love to ski them, I will never fit an F1 LT (or Alien RS) because the lower can't be punched enough (very much) for my wide feet.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    942
    There have been quite a few changes to the boots since the round of protos that were being skied by a few folks in NA and Europe.

    We literally just got the next round of samples last week or the week before. This round does include the stiffer carbon version as well as the non carbon. Again only in 26.5 and still not very many of them.

    There were some tweaks to the protos based on feedback, which was the goal with that round of prototypes. It’s why they were sent out.

    Will these ski like your 130 flex inbounds boots? Hell no! Will they be stiffer and more responsive than other boots in this category, most likely yes. They also can be punched, although not as much as a standard grilamid or pu plastic. I don’t remember the amount you can stretch them, I’ll look that up.

    I personally haven’t received any feedback on the most recent samples. I would say the overall sentiment on the first round of protos was how well they skied even on skis over 100mm under foot.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,948
    A boot can have a very stiff flex laterally without having it forward

    I bet these will be an upgrade to my Alien RS and a complement to my ZGTPs.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    A boot can have a very stiff flex laterally without having it forward
    I totally understand, but the issue is for those of us who drive skis from the front, or skis that respond to being driven that way, even lighter skinnier ones. That’s the reason why F1s and Backlands were a failure for me and I’ve stuck with TLT6s as long as I have (pleaseletsnotrehashhowtheTLT6skis)


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    22,948
    Quote Originally Posted by dub_xion View Post
    I totally understand, but the issue is for those of us who drive skis from the front, or skis that respond to being driven that way, even lighter skinnier ones. That’s the reason why F1s and Backlands were a failure for me and I’ve stuck with TLT6s as long as I have (pleaseletsnotrehashhowtheTLT6skis)


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    OH I hear you! Thus the

    I've turned down many "stiff" boots, including alpine, not only due to soft forward flex, but also due to short tongue/forward height.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    OH I hear you! Thus the
    Ah! Got it


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Summit Park UT
    Posts
    1,158
    Wasatchback - whats the cuff height like on these? People have commented that the Skorpius is one lighter boot that has a higher cuff height which makes it ski like a bigger boot, and I've heard the opposite about the Atomic backland, low cuff height, skis worse (at least older versions).

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,626
    Quote Originally Posted by wilcox510 View Post
    Wasatchback - whats the cuff height like on these? People have commented that the Skorpius is one lighter boot that has a higher cuff height which makes it ski like a bigger boot, and I've heard the opposite about the Atomic backland, low cuff height, skis worse (at least older versions).
    Agreed on Skorpius cuff. F1 LT cuff is about the same height as well (slightly lower in the front and higher in the back than the Skorp). New Backland still has a very low cuff, not quite as bad as the old one though.

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    35
    Currently in possession of a pair and some of the other new boots for 22/23 in the same segment (Dynafit Blacklight, Salomon MTN Summit). Have not skied any yet but first impressions are: the fit is very similar to my Zero G Pro's but so tight, especially length-wise in the same size. Oh and they are all lying through their teeth about weight on these things (+10-15% on all manufacturers, dynafit most true to weight)

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by Kreemcheese View Post
    Currently in possession of a pair and some of the other new boots for 22/23 in the same segment (Dynafit Blacklight, Salomon MTN Summit). Have not skied any yet but first impressions are: the fit is very similar to my Zero G Pro's but so tight, especially length-wise in the same size. Oh and they are all lying through their teeth about weight on these things (+10-15% on all manufacturers, dynafit most true to weight)
    Would REALLY like to hear a fit comparison of said boots. I'm in the market for something in this segment.

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    942
    Quote Originally Posted by Kreemcheese View Post
    Currently in possession of a pair and some of the other new boots for 22/23 in the same segment (Dynafit Blacklight, Salomon MTN Summit). Have not skied any yet but first impressions are: the fit is very similar to my Zero G Pro's but so tight, especially length-wise in the same size. Oh and they are all lying through their teeth about weight on these things (+10-15% on all manufacturers, dynafit most true to weight)
    Protos and the Non carbon 26.5s were both within 10g of spec on the Skimo.Co scale… haven’t weighed the carbons.

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,478
    Quote Originally Posted by Kreemcheese View Post
    …..the fit is very similar to my Zero G Pro's but so tight, especially length-wise in the same size.
    Uggh! Wasatchback said upthread that one or two of his testers mentioned this as well. Why do manufacturers do this?

    I find the Backland shorter than Hawx XTD too - eliminates it as an option because I don’t want to mash my toes on long touring days, punching lightweight tech boots for length is somewhat problematic due to warping and I sure as heck don’t want to size up and get sloppy heel, ankle fit.

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    897
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Thomas View Post
    Would REALLY like to hear a fit comparison of said boots. I'm in the market for something in this segment.
    Yes, please!

    Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpnz View Post
    Uggh! Wasatchback said upthread that one or two of his testers mentioned this as well. Why do manufacturers do this?

    I find the Backland shorter than Hawx XTD too - eliminates it as an option because I don’t want to mash my toes on long touring days, punching lightweight tech boots for length is somewhat problematic due to warping and I sure as heck don’t want to size up and get sloppy heel, ankle fit.
    If you make you boot 3mm mm shorter per size it is lighter. If everyone else is doing it, and you don’t, your boot is too heavy to dumb idiots on the internet,

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,626
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpnz View Post
    Uggh! Wasatchback said upthread that one or two of his testers mentioned this as well. Why do manufacturers do this?

    I find the Backland shorter than Hawx XTD too - eliminates it as an option because I don’t want to mash my toes on long touring days, punching lightweight tech boots for length is somewhat problematic due to warping and I sure as heck don’t want to size up and get sloppy heel, ankle fit.
    The Hawx XTD was a perfect fit for me out of the box, the Skorpius is almost as good and no other light boot comes anywhere close. I encourage you to try the current version of the Skorp with the instep buckle because they are making the instep higher for next season.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    50
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    The Hawx XTD was a perfect fit for me out of the box, the Skorpius is almost as good and no other light boot comes anywhere close. I encourage you to try the current version of the Skorp with the instep buckle because they are making the instep higher for next season.
    Did you go same size in both? Xtds are basically perfect but i did need a minor shell cook and a liner mold. Most insteps are too high and it's hard to lock down my heel in bad snow without crushing my silly shaped midfoot.

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Thomas View Post
    Would REALLY like to hear a fit comparison of said boots. I'm in the market for something in this segment.
    I have the Scarpa F1 XT and Dalbello Quatum Evo on their way here so will update later on those. I ski 26,5 boots

    But here are some extremely quick thoughts on fit:
    MTN Summit: Still weird with the heel hold, feels like it's "lower" or closer to the bottom of the foot then all the other boots I have tried, roomy instep and extremely roomy width wise in the forefoot. The gaiter will probably get destroyed in the back of the boot and there is a tab you need to pull on in order to get them on properly, felt strange first times around.

    Blacklight/ TLT X: had to get them in a 27,5 in order to get them to fit length-wise (still touching) when I normally fit very good in a 26,5 Dynafit so there's that. This makes fit on the rest of the boot quite strange since the length is more like a 26.5 in my opinion but width, heel pocket, instep all seems a bit big for my foot as they would in a true 27,5. Cannot get my head around these yet.

    Peak Carbon: Very tight on my feet length-wise, but good heel hold, and overall fit is very similar to my ZGPT except length and I will need to punch these in order to make it work. Not as smooth to get into walk-mode as the others due to the wires (same style as ZGTP). Very good liner, feels better and more dense than the stock ZGPT liner. Very nice flex (indoors at least), progressive but stiff enough.

    Sorry for the bare minimun of information at the moment. Will circle back after I have done my 7000 feet of walking on all boots with some more in-depth info.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,509
    Quote Originally Posted by Kreemcheese View Post
    I have the Scarpa F1 XT and Dalbello Quatum Evo on their way here so will update later on those. I ski 26,5 boots

    But here are some extremely quick thoughts on fit:
    MTN Summit: Still weird with the heel hold, feels like it's "lower" or closer to the bottom of the foot then all the other boots I have tried, roomy instep and extremely roomy width wise in the forefoot. The gaiter will probably get destroyed in the back of the boot and there is a tab you need to pull on in order to get them on properly, felt strange first times around.

    Blacklight/ TLT X: had to get them in a 27,5 in order to get them to fit length-wise (still touching) when I normally fit very good in a 26,5 Dynafit so there's that. This makes fit on the rest of the boot quite strange since the length is more like a 26.5 in my opinion but width, heel pocket, instep all seems a bit big for my foot as they would in a true 27,5. Cannot get my head around these yet.

    Peak Carbon: Very tight on my feet length-wise, but good heel hold, and overall fit is very similar to my ZGPT except length and I will need to punch these in order to make it work. Not as smooth to get into walk-mode as the others due to the wires (same style as ZGTP). Very good liner, feels better and more dense than the stock ZGPT liner. Very nice flex (indoors at least), progressive but stiff enough.

    Sorry for the bare minimun of information at the moment. Will circle back after I have done my 7000 feet of walking on all boots with some more in-depth info.
    Thanks for the comparison, Kreemcheese, this is much more valuable than beta from someone who only has one boot and thinks it's God's Gift. Sounds like the first batch of production Zero G Peaks has just arrived in North America, so we'll see how they compare. My basis for comparison is the Scarpa Alien RS and Dalbello Quantum Asolo Factory . . .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •