Atomic Maverick 100 Ti thoughts

[kc_7777]

Hey,

Sold a few pairs of skis in the quiver, and find myself with some extra Duke PT 16s (with 100mm brakes that appear to only fit <101mm skis) looking for a home. This ski will be for 90% skiing inbounds at Whistler, and 10% for short tours for exercise at Seymour Mt near where I live. Perfect for a Duke PT.

I want a 179cm-180cm length, ~99mm-100mm underfoot, that is both fun and capable, that weighs ~1,800 gm. Prefer mounts around -7cm.

I was considering the Bentchetler 100 for this binding. But I own the Dynastar M-Free 99 with Pivots. So the BC 100 may overlap for inbounds. Want something that is playful like a BC 100 or M-Free, but with a bit more stability and edge grip. Thought about a Dynastar M-Pro 99 (127-99-117), but the -12cm mount fucking scares me. And the M-Pro 99 is is 1,900 gm.

Never liked any Atomics except for the Bent Chetlers. But the new Atomic Maverick 100 Ti checks a lot of the boxes? Only weighs 1,800 gm in the 180cm. Specs of 132-100-120. Radius: 19m.

Has HZRN tip for float in fresh snow.

Rec is approx. -9cm I think? There are marks on the ski to go +2-3cm or -2-3cm for mounts?

Anyone have any thoughts/experience on this ski?

It's not hideous like past Atomics:

[Gaffney10]

Also looking at this ski. Anyone tried them out?

[gregL]

Anyone have any thoughts/experience on this ski?

It's decent but the Maverick 95ti is better.

[El Chupacabra]

Thread made me Google this ski, as I really like the Vantage 97 ti I have. The HRZN tip spooning looks tiny:
https://blisterreview.com/gear-revie...maverick-95-ti

Overall, sounds like a softer Vantage, which is not what I want - every time I try a "easier, more accessible" version of a ski I like, I don't like the new softer version.

[phatty]

Anyone have any more info on the Maverick 100? I'm filling the 100mm slot in the quiver and it sounds pretty solid from Ski Essentials.
https://www.skiessentials.com/Chairl...YaArdaEALw_wcB

Primarily looking for inbounds use. Need a high top end but looking for the "playful charger" category. DD is MFree 108. Have Brahma for hard core groomer days and LP105 for days I want to hate ski the mountain.

[Shorty_J]

My buddy bought a pair last year and he didn't jive with them initially but has grown to really like them after a couple of days to suss them out.

He's a good skier and skis pretty fast when conditions allow.

I personally haven't skied them.

Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk

[m7b51e]

rumour has it atomic is making a 115 maverick alongside a 109 maverick
the fwt athletes have been on a ski with the backland 117 graphic

[gaijin]

Does it have a sidecut above 25 or is this gonna suck, too?


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[MyNameIsAugustWest]

Just here to say the M-Pro 99s rock. Hold a strong edge and they are fine in variable snow up to 12". Wouldn't call them playful but I ski them in the EC trees and they rip.

[Beder]

tempted at $400

https://www.evo.com/outlet/skis/atom...skis-2024-.jpg