Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Atomic Maverick 100 Ti thoughts

  1. 01-18-2022, 05:10 PM #1
    kc_7777's Avatar
    kc_7777 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,030

    Atomic Maverick 100 Ti thoughts

    Hey,

    Sold a few pairs of skis in the quiver, and find myself with some extra Duke PT 16s (with 100mm brakes that appear to only fit <101mm skis) looking for a home. This ski will be for 90% skiing inbounds at Whistler, and 10% for short tours for exercise at Seymour Mt near where I live. Perfect for a Duke PT.

    I want a 179cm-180cm length, ~99mm-100mm underfoot, that is both fun and capable, that weighs ~1,800 gm. Prefer mounts around -7cm.

    I was considering the Bentchetler 100 for this binding. But I own the Dynastar M-Free 99 with Pivots. So the BC 100 may overlap for inbounds. Want something that is playful like a BC 100 or M-Free, but with a bit more stability and edge grip. Thought about a Dynastar M-Pro 99 (127-99-117), but the -12cm mount fucking scares me. And the M-Pro 99 is is 1,900 gm.

    Never liked any Atomics except for the Bent Chetlers. But the new Atomic Maverick 100 Ti checks a lot of the boxes? Only weighs 1,800 gm in the 180cm. Specs of 132-100-120. Radius: 19m.

    Has HZRN tip for float in fresh snow.

    Rec is approx. -9cm I think? There are marks on the ski to go +2-3cm or -2-3cm for mounts?

    Anyone have any thoughts/experience on this ski?

    It's not hideous like past Atomics:
    Click image for larger version.  Name: ski_atomic-maverick-100-ti-2021_n14086-11339-1_l.jpg  Views: 144  Size: 57.0 KB  ID: 401804
    Last edited by kc_7777; 01-18-2022 at 06:48 PM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-01-2022, 06:57 PM #2
    Gaffney10's Avatar
    Gaffney10 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    BZN
    Posts
    519
    Also looking at this ski. Anyone tried them out?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-02-2022, 12:08 AM #3
    gregL's Avatar
    gregL is online now User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,510
    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post
    Anyone have any thoughts/experience on this ski?
    It's decent but the Maverick 95ti is better.
    http://www.randosaigai.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 02-02-2022, 08:40 AM #4
    El Chupacabra's Avatar
    El Chupacabra is offline pillowpants
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,698
    Thread made me Google this ski, as I really like the Vantage 97 ti I have. The HRZN tip spooning looks tiny:
    https://blisterreview.com/gear-revie...maverick-95-ti

    Overall, sounds like a softer Vantage, which is not what I want - every time I try a "easier, more accessible" version of a ski I like, I don't like the new softer version.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 12-05-2022, 08:35 PM #5
    phatty is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,957
    Anyone have any more info on the Maverick 100? I'm filling the 100mm slot in the quiver and it sounds pretty solid from Ski Essentials.
    https://www.skiessentials.com/Chairl...YaArdaEALw_wcB

    Primarily looking for inbounds use. Need a high top end but looking for the "playful charger" category. DD is MFree 108. Have Brahma for hard core groomer days and LP105 for days I want to hate ski the mountain.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 12-05-2022, 08:41 PM #6
    Shorty_J's Avatar
    Shorty_J is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,791
    My buddy bought a pair last year and he didn't jive with them initially but has grown to really like them after a couple of days to suss them out.

    He's a good skier and skis pretty fast when conditions allow.

    I personally haven't skied them.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 05-10-2023, 04:51 AM #7
    m7b51e is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    6
    rumour has it atomic is making a 115 maverick alongside a 109 maverick
    the fwt athletes have been on a ski with the backland 117 graphic
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 05-10-2023, 05:22 AM #8
    gaijin's Avatar
    gaijin is online now Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,286
    Does it have a sidecut above 25 or is this gonna suck, too?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 05-10-2023, 02:20 PM #9
    MyNameIsAugustWest's Avatar
    MyNameIsAugustWest is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Inside the Circle
    Posts
    4,498
    Just here to say the M-Pro 99s rock. Hold a strong edge and they are fine in variable snow up to 12". Wouldn't call them playful but I ski them in the EC trees and they rip.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 11-06-2024, 04:23 PM #10
    Beder's Avatar
    Beder is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,390
    tempted at $400

    https://www.evo.com/outlet/skis/atom...skis-2024-.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« FS: 1[emoji[emoji642]4[emoji641]][emoji[emoji642]4[emoji642]] Nocta | Improving rearward ROM of Tecnica Zero G »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules