Check Out Our Shop
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7
Results 151 to 162 of 162

Thread: Line Blade

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    NWCT
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by carlh View Post
    Just picked up a set of 181s for skiing with the kid and fucking around. Skis have plugged holes for spx on the line at around my bsl or open holes for wardens that will put me around -1.5cm. All my other skis are super directions mounts like -10 or further back, am I going to regret mounting these a little back so I can use the open holes and wardens from my stash or should I find some pivots or spx to be on the line?
    Tough one. I think they be better on the line, especially with the way the metal in the ski is split at the midsole mark to allow them to flex like crazy, but idk if it’s worth buying new clamps if you already have Wardens. Can you squeeze a Warden mount in close to the line or maybe just move the toe mount forward and use the adjustment in the heel to get closer to the line?

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,782
    Blue (PA) season opener yesterday were perfect Blade conditions. Foggy and warm, slushy conditions. Great at making a ton of short turns and they are stable enough to open them up for some big trail edge to edge turns.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Location
    Squamish, BC
    Posts
    20
    Has the Blade changed since the 20/21 model launched? I have a chance to buy those. There is certainly some confusion about mount point, with the 20/21 model saying -7cm and I think all future models saying -4cm.

    I've finally found a place to demo the Blade in Whistler: Premium Rentals, they have the 23/24 version/graphics. On hand flexing, I'm certain I've never skied anything remotely this soft before, which has me worried.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    NWCT
    Posts
    2,391

    Line Blade

    Quote Originally Posted by Steffenator View Post
    Has the Blade changed since the 20/21 model launched? I have a chance to buy those. There is certainly some confusion about mount point, with the 20/21 model saying -7cm and I think all future models saying -4cm.

    I've finally found a place to demo the Blade in Whistler: Premium Rentals, they have the 23/24 version/graphics. On hand flexing, I'm certain I've never skied anything remotely this soft before, which has me worried.
    No change. Same ski. Mount point hasn’t changed either - Line just measures their center in a weird way. I think they measure setback from the center of the sidecut or cambered portions vs the center of the actual ski. It’s still -7 from true center.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Back in Seattle
    Posts
    1,496
    They are -7. They are soft and turny but as long as you have them on edge they can go reasonably fast. They ski they way they sound and like making lots of turns at moderate speeds and general fucking around. I ski mine with my 7yo to make going slow on the blues fun and they are perfect for that. When I switch to my bonafides the difference is very noticeable in all the ways you would expect.

    Quote Originally Posted by Steffenator View Post
    Has the Blade changed since the 20/21 model launched? I have a chance to buy those. There is certainly some confusion about mount point, with the 20/21 model saying -7cm and I think all future models saying -4cm.

    I've finally found a place to demo the Blade in Whistler: Premium Rentals, they have the 23/24 version/graphics. On hand flexing, I'm certain I've never skied anything remotely this soft before, which has me worried.

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,782
    Yep, found they get pretty squirrely above 40/45mph, at least in my 170cm length. Definitely great for the fucking around and making lots of turns. Traded with a buddy who skis only Brahmas or a SL race ski, his thoughts were they turn like his SL skis, but easier releasing. That's why they're so good for general screwing around. Tails can be released and slashed and soft slushy groomers they're an absolute blast going edge to edge of a trail

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    287
    Quote Originally Posted by VTskibum View Post
    Yep, found they get pretty squirrely above 40/45mph, at least in my 170cm length. Definitely great for the fucking around and making lots of turns. Traded with a buddy who skis only Brahmas or a SL race ski, his thoughts were they turn like his SL skis, but easier releasing. That's why they're so good for general screwing around. Tails can be released and slashed and soft slushy groomers they're an absolute blast going edge to edge of a trail
    Haha. When people ask about them on lifts (happens a LOT) I describe them as slalom skis with training wheels

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,782
    Yep, lots of lift line comments at my small PA ski area about those are huge Powder skis! Wish they were actually mid-80s underfoot, with same radius and flex. Have some actual SL skis coming in to supplement these when it's really firm as they definitely aren't a race ski

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    287
    Quote Originally Posted by VTskibum View Post
    Yep, lots of lift line comments at my small PA ski area about those are huge Powder skis! Wish they were actually mid-80s underfoot, with same radius and flex. Have some actual SL skis coming in to supplement these when it's really firm as they definitely aren't a race ski
    Yeah the edge hold isn't great. For Utah groomers they're generally get but get a little skittish arcing on steeper terrain. A buddy has been talking about getting these dimensions made with a FIS SL build to help with the edge hold. We thought maybe we could just epoxy a sheet of stainless to the topsheet to try it out...

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,782
    Interesting idea, though imagine it'd loose much of it's fuck about fun factor that way.

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,241

    Line Blade

    It’s a ski I don’t really “get” if it can’t hold a good edge on a firm day. They’re not a bases flat ski. And I can’t always trust their edge. If the snow is fun I’m on something I can zoom around on, which is probably where I’m going wrong. I got these to make unfun snow fun, and that’s not really their bag.

    I haven’t given up on them, but I’m about to.
    focus.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    616
    I have been spending most of my season on my 181 Blades and 165 SL Racetigers since there hasn't been much for fresh snow. The Blades definitely aren't great when it's icy. They don't go across the fall line as violently as SL skis either. When its a little bit soft they are really fun, while not being as much of a chore as race skis. I'm glad to have a pair

    Sent from my SM-G960U using TGR Forums mobile app

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •