Got out on a trail recently for the first time in a long time, and learned why all the bikes I see these days are beefier than they used to be. I learned the downs are a lot closer to DH than they used to be! Which is fine with me as I always liked the downs the best anyway.
My vintage Yeti 575 was fine on the up (tho I wasn't) but clearly not up to demands of the down.
So I'm thinking if I'm going to do any riding - which I'd like to do - I should probably re-think the equipment, and get down to 1 bike that does it all. My interests are less technical and definitely more toward down than up, and I used to love riding lift-served at Whistler (mostly the bluer, flowier tracks). First time I went there I took the Yeti and it, again, was not up to the task so I picked up a used DHiller that improved that experience a lot. Obviously though I'll still want to be able to climb.
I have the Yeti, and I have an old, heavy (OLD!) Norco DH whip. The Norco came from a bike shop guy with pretty great (OLD!) components. Full Shimano Saint group, Marzochi Bomber 888 fork, DH rims and tires. Can't remember what the rear shock is, but is similar in quality.
What if I got a lighter more all-mountain frame and swapped those components over except maybe the rims and tires? I suspect that fork is probably much heavier than current single-crown stuff (is it really?) and the old Saint is heavier than necessary too (is it?). Would this approach still make the thing a complete pig for climbing with a more climb-friendly frame?
I'm definitely on a tight budget so the less I have to buy the better.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Ridicule? What should I look for in a frame?
Bookmarks