Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 26 to 39 of 39

Thread: Mtb hub overthinking

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,826
    I've concluded that ~50-60 points of engagement is the sweet spot for hubs.

    Lower engagement than that gets to be noticeably annoying on techy climbs. But higher engagement than that rapidly gets into the realm of diminishing returns (unless you're doing actual trials). And higher engagement hubs tend to be some combination of less durable, more expensive, obnoxiously loud, hard to work on, unnecessarily heavy, or all of the above. Plus high engagement hubs make your suspension feel worse.

    So that all leads me to the DT Swiss hubs with a 54t ratchet (the stock DT internals, not the chinesium stuff) as the best option.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,722
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    I've concluded that ~50-60 points of engagement is the sweet spot for hubs.

    Lower engagement than that gets to be noticeably annoying on techy climbs. But higher engagement than that rapidly gets into the realm of diminishing returns (unless you're doing actual trials). And higher engagement hubs tend to be some combination of less durable, more expensive, obnoxiously loud, hard to work on, unnecessarily heavy, or all of the above. Plus high engagement hubs make your suspension feel worse.

    So that all leads me to the DT Swiss hubs with a 54t ratchet (the stock DT internals, not the chinesium stuff) as the best option.
    Basically agreed on POE, though I'm fine with more like 36-72. I might go for the 54t in my DT hubs if I was buying new ratchets but I don't care nearly enough to swap out the 36s I already have.

    I do have a pair of Hydras for one of the wheelsets for my hardtail (where the pedal kickback concerns are obviously irrelevant) and don't have any major complaints with them, particularly, but they're not quite as smooth as DTs or Hadleys, make a bit more noise, and the 690 POE is so far down the path of diminishing returns that it just doesn't matter.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    7,156
    I cared about engagement when I cared about flat technical xc stuff. Now that shit just annoys me. As long as the majority of my time is spent toiling uphill to find a spot to come back downhill, I'm not hung up on super high engagement.
    However many are in a shit ton.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    6,473
    Another happy P321 owner. Near silence with near instant engagement in a lightweight package.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Durango
    Posts
    778
    I have a set of Hydras that I have really liked. I dont care so much about the POE but I love the silent hub. My rear is silent for about 20 miles with some grease then slowly gets louder each ride. The XD freehub seemed to be quiet for more miles each time I re-greased. The Shimano wasnt lasting as long, but hopefully as I grease it a couple more times it will last longer. Onyx and 321 were on my list but just found a good deal on Hydras with WR1 agents. Now I am moving to 29 so I have to decide what to do with this 27.5 wheelset.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Snowmass
    Posts
    598
    Maybe I'm lucky, but I have ~300 miles on a set of Hydras (xd) and they're pretty much silent. Warm weather and longer rides seem to loosen the pawls up a bit, but honestly unless I'm coasting next to a wall or in a tunnel I really have to strain to hear the hub over my tires. Maybe Colorado Cyclist packs them with some extra viscous grease, idk?

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Back in Seattle
    Posts
    1,503
    Leaning towards screwing the budget and getting the we are ones but I can only use the discount code on the stock i9. Is hydra worth $250 over the 1/1? Main bonus are bling and possibly quieter but not sure as I can’t find a direct comparison. I suspect the 1/1 will be plenty durable and has perfectly acceptable enagagement.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Bham
    Posts
    298
    RE: Hydra hub noise, if you want to quiet them, a very viscous oil is far superior to grease. Even the good Dumonde Tech stuff. I use a high mileage chain lube, a little on each pawl and a generous bead on the ring gear. I ride quite a bit and re-up monthly at best. It takes 5 minutes to reaplly.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using TGR Forums mobile app

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    NorCal coast
    Posts
    2,209
    I got Hydras specifically to be noisy. I used to run a trail bell but it irritates me even more than the bitchy NIMBY hikers, so figured blingy buzzy hubs can be my warning. Only 2 rides on them, and they've gotten noisier but wouldn't say they're "loud". The silver finish looks so sweet too.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,826
    Quote Originally Posted by carlh View Post
    Leaning towards screwing the budget and getting the we are ones but I can only use the discount code on the stock i9. Is hydra worth $250 over the 1/1? Main bonus are bling and possibly quieter but not sure as I can’t find a direct comparison. I suspect the 1/1 will be plenty durable and has perfectly acceptable enagagement.
    I have some 1/1's. They're fine - no complaints. Moderate loudness, plenty of engagement. Haven't had them long enough to comment on durability.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,702
    Quote Originally Posted by mntlion View Post
    DT 350 and upgrade engagement?
    I came here to post this.
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,702
    Quote Originally Posted by Andeh View Post
    I got Hydras specifically to be noisy. I used to run a trail bell but it irritates me even more than the bitchy NIMBY hikers, so figured blingy buzzy hubs can be my warning. Only 2 rides on them, and they've gotten noisier but wouldn't say they're "loud". The silver finish looks so sweet too.
    That's what earbuds are for

    /ducks from impending shit storm/
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    NorCal coast
    Posts
    2,209
    Quote Originally Posted by grskier View Post
    That's what earbuds are for

    /ducks from impending shit storm/
    Haha. Worst is hikers with earbuds, who look super offended when you sneak around them, take a bud out to yell at you, then realize you had a bell / noisy hub and they were just oblivious, and the gaper mouth just clamps shut.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Back in Seattle
    Posts
    1,503
    FYI fron Hunt:

    There won't be too many riding circumstances where you will be ineligible for making a claim so long as using single crown forks - this is a crash replacement scheme - so long as you keep within the operating parameters of the wheel.

    There is no problem using inserts again so long as they are approved for use for that type of wheel. In terms of rim replacement - this is a lifetime replacement scheme but it is limited to one rim replacement - please bear that in mind, this is the same for any wheel under the H_Care sheme.

    My read is they are unlikely to deny a claim but you can only do it once. Not sure that is worth it over the other options on the market.

    Now to decide if I want a hydra $200 more than a 1/1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •