I know, silly question to ask this crowd, but given that I don't even let myself think about the money I spend on skiing otherwise...anyway, I haven't bought skis for myself in awhile but was looking at this year's buyer's guide and was wondering if I'm missing out. Here's the thing: I ski a variety of (old) race skis, am most often on a pair of (old) Scott park skis as my default 'other' ski (they are just pretty easy to ski if I'm lazy but also have decent performance), and get on the Legend XXL's whenever it's deep (love them and have stockpiled a second pair of those). I've occasionally skied newer skis but just haven't ever felt anything better about them than I get on my old beater boards (I maintain my skis very well, even if some of them have quite a few (repaired) core shots and small sections of compressed or otherwise slightly compromised edge/sidewall). I've never spent a full day skiing any of those new skis, so maybe I'm not giving them enough of a chance?
Other thing is that I am just not a fan of reverse camber, early rise, etc. At least not on the skis I've tried. I like traditional sidecut and camber. Again, though, maybe I just haven't given non-traditional shapes/sidecuts enough of a chance.
So am I wrong that my old skis provide everything I want/need in a ski, and newer skis wouldn't make a big difference? The magazine descriptions of them make me think maybe I am missing out, but my experiences trying some of their predecessors don't support that.
I am slightly tempted to just buy a new pair (whatever the best candidate is) and see how it goes (how dumb would that be?).
Bookmarks