Official ATK Binding Thread

[AlpiNord]

Looking for an AL05 spacer. I see them on line for $60, but that seems steep. Anyone, Spyderjon?

I found this thread ATK Spacer (Google search, not TGR). It'd be an easy 3d Print as a 'stomp pad' if I had some dimensions. They would be specific heights with no adjustment and need to have a gap:

EDIT:

The ATK spacers are designed with a sliding afd and are meant to be in contact with the boot the whole time. Stomp pads on the zed are supposed to have a gap and are designed for support as the ski flexes, they are doing two different things, and I am sure the feel between the two while used according to spec is going to be very noticeable.

But I am sure the stomp pad is going to be way better than just floating on the pins, which is jarring as hell and fatiguing AF when things get roughed up even in chop. Forget it on hard packed or firm conditions

Attachment 398225
Attachment 398226
Attachment 398227

To make it height adjustable is a little more involved.

Attachment 342989
Attachment 342990

The ATK Al05 has a sliding AFD.

[MottN]

Looking for an AL05 spacer. I see them on line for $60, but that seems steep. Anyone, Spyderjon?

Oliunid has them for $25, but add on another $15 to ship. Worth it if you need some other stuff too, they always have great prices on ATK and sometimes skis and related gear. I've bought lots of stuff from them before.

[cat in january]

Alpinord Appreciate the response, but think I want it to slide

Saw those on Olinud, but they are the AL07

[AlpiNord]

Alpinord Appreciate the response, but think I want it to slide

Saw those on Olinud, but they are the AL07

Thought so, but posted the info for general consumption.

Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums

[fool]

Looking at getting a pair of tech bindings for my ski mountaineering / low tide BC day setup (BD Helio Carbon 88s or Cirque 84s). BD has the Kuluar 9 - not Kuluar LT - on sale. It seems that the Kuluar 9 (non LT) is the old model, with a 50g weight penalty? Any other major differences?

I’m looking at Kuluar 9 or the ATK Crest 10 - any strong views? I saw a few posts comparing the differences a few pages back (quoted below). I’m relatively new to the AT/tech binding world - coming from the Fritschi Vipec Evo after 15 years on tele. 195# with ski gear, DIN ~8 usually.

Primary differences seem to be that the Crest has brakes, Cam Release system, Elastic Release System, different vertical and lateral releases, and walk mode heights (and rotations to access them).

https://www.telemark-pyrenees.com/at...s?currency=USD

The only reason to get the Kuluar is if you need a high lateral release value. The Kuluar 12 uses the same heel spring as the 10 release Trofeo, but it does have lateral release up to 12. They only weigh like 20 grams less than the Crest which can often be found at a similar price, and offers the Cam system which I think is worth a few extra bucks and grams if you're looking at these bindings. The Cam system allows more precise release adjustment and more consistent vertical release.

Not true.

Crest is flat or high, or rotate heel for medium.

Which is a ball ache if you spend you whole uphill in medium/high.

Agree cam system is great.

Weight difference is more than 20g too.

Rotating (pins rearward) gets you only a few mm higher than forward/flap over pins. Think of this as medium and medium plus a little. Its by no means high.

It might make a difference to some, but the main reason for rotating them (pins to the rear) is if you're on rolling terrain and need flat mode.

The point I’m making is this. Without turning the heel.

Crest: Flat and whatever the fuck you want to call it.

Kuluar: Medium and high.

Turning the heels gets you other things. Flat for Kuluar and a different riser heigh for the Crest.

For me. Where I tour. Medium and high without turning is what I’m looking for. Happy to turn the heel for flat on the slim occasion I’m in rolling terrain.

In my mind I’d be similar to CaliBrit and not want to turn the heel for med/high riser positions. But I’m unsure the importance of the other features that the Crest has relative to the Kuluar. Curious of the collective's thoughts.

Also, considering the Dynafit Speed Radical for my daily driving pow touring setup: seems heavier but a solid option given my weight. Thoughts? Would you choose an ATK Crest 10 instead of the Speed Radical? I know this is the ATK thread - figure there's enough tech opinions in here to ask.

[MottN]

Saw those on Olinud, but they are the AL07

Gotcha, I didn't read the description, hah.
I didn't even realize there were two different version until now. Might still work for what you need but a bit of a gamble. I have one of these but I'm not sure which it was that I ordered forever ago.

The AL05 and AL07 are similar the difference being that the AL05 has a lower minimum height setting.

I haven’t mounted either but own both. I’ve gone the FR14 route with the integrated spacer.

I can’t see how you would mount the other two spacers nicely with brakes on the bindings. Brake less you would mount up the bindings then mount the space. There is only 1 screw on the space so you have to get it right up against the baseplate to hold it straight.

I feel the extra power in the heel on the FR14 with the space.

As stated by CaliBrit, the AL05/7 Freeride Spacers are essentially the same and can be fitted to any tech binding providing there's the boot to ski gap is sufficient to install it. The AL05/7 are screwed directly to the ski. Some have even been thinning them down to fit when there's insufficient room: https://www.atkbindings.com/en/prodo...sories/al05-2/

The AL09 Freeride Spacer is a different version that has lateral pressed metal brackets the ends of which hook around the two front heel mounting locations and the brackets slot in to recesses in the underside of the heel base plate. Therefore the AL09 can only be used with binding models designed to accept it, namely the Freeraider 14, the C-Raider 12 and the Raider 12. The AL09 is included when the FR14 is purchased and it's an optional extra with the C-R12 and the R12. https://www.atkbindings.com/en/prodo...ide-spacer-en/

[MottN]

Looking at getting a pair of tech bindings for my ski mountaineering / low tide BC day setup (BD Helio Carbon 88s or Cirque 84s). BD has the Kuluar 9 - not Kuluar LT - on sale. It seems that the Kuluar 9 (non LT) is the old model, with a 50g weight penalty? Any other major differences?

I’m looking at Kuluar 9 or the ATK Crest 10 - any strong views? I saw a few posts comparing the differences a few pages back (quoted below). I’m relatively new to the AT/tech binding world - coming from the Fritschi Vipec Evo after 15 years on tele. 195# with ski gear, DIN ~8 usually.

Primary differences seem to be that the Crest has brakes, Cam Release system, Elastic Release System, different vertical and lateral releases, and walk mode heights (and rotations to access them).

https://www.telemark-pyrenees.com/at...s?currency=USD









In my mind I’d be similar to CaliBrit and not want to turn the heel for med/high riser positions. But I’m unsure the importance of the other features that the Crest has relative to the Kuluar. Curious of the collective's thoughts.

Also, considering the Dynafit Speed Radical for my daily driving pow touring setup: seems heavier but a solid option given my weight. Thoughts? Would you choose an ATK Crest 10 instead of the Speed Radical? I know this is the ATK thread - figure there's enough tech opinions in here to ask.

The only difference between Kuluar and Kuluar LT is brakes. They have the same plastic base plate so you can always get brakes and add them.

On crest vs Kuluar, I think you have to decide if you want a U-spring binding without vertical release adjustability.
In my experience, having to turn the tower to get to different heights is super annoying. But that's only a problem if your touring boots don't have good ROM.
The crest has a different toe piece than the kuluar also. I don't know if there is a functional difference with the springs on both sides vs only one. I have bindings with both but haven't noticed any difference.

On the speed radicals, If you already have them go for it. But if you are buying something new there are better options unless the price difference is huge.

[fool]

The only difference between Kuluar and Kuluar LT is brakes. They have the same plastic base plate so you can always get brakes and add them.

On crest vs Kuluar, I think you have to decide if you want a U-spring binding without vertical release adjustability.
In my experience, having to turn the tower to get to different heights is super annoying. But that's only a problem if your touring boots don't have good ROM.
The crest has a different toe piece than the kuluar also. I don't know if there is a functional difference with the springs on both sides vs only one. I have bindings with both but haven't noticed any difference.

On the speed radicals, If you already have them go for it. But if you are buying something new there are better options unless the price difference is huge.

Thanks, MottN. Good to know. It looks like I can get Speed Radicals for $335, ATK Crest 10 for $300, and Kuluar for $280. I agree on wanting to avoid having to turn the tower for different heights.

What is the use case or primary reason for wanting vertical release adjustability? Since I'm just joining the AT/tech world I don't know if it's that useful to me. Generally I'm skiing more conservatively on AT gear, and especially so for my mountaineering setup.

[fleaches]

Thanks, MottN. Good to know. It looks like I can get Speed Radicals for $335, ATK Crest 10 for $300, and Kuluar for $280. I agree on wanting to avoid having to turn the tower for different heights.

What is the use case or primary reason for wanting vertical release adjustability? Since I'm just joining the AT/tech world I don't know if it's that useful to me. Generally I'm skiing more conservatively on AT gear, and especially so for my mountaineering setup.

If you don't mine used, I have some crests I might want to sell. 97 brakes though.


Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

[sf]

Yes, I know…..Google it myself etc, but I’m in a slight hurry

Is the M05 obsolete, or will it work since the «new» toe pattern didn’t come in to effect? Except from the C-Raider that is.

[jacob_dbu]

Has anyone seen this issue with ATK Freeraider heels?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uGbowor1F0M

[Westcoaster]

Has anyone seen this issue with ATK Freeraider heels?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uGbowor1F0M

Those bindings seem like they've been through some stuff.

I'm sure moment or atk or bd will warranty those heels.

[cat in january]

Follow up question. For folks who have used the AL05 or AL07 how have they held up when used touring in flat mode? I assume the boot lands on it.

[kevino]

Follow up question. For folks who have used the AL05 or AL07 how have they held up when used touring in flat mode? I assume the boot lands on it.

No problem x3 different set up over the last 3 years

[timmaio]

Has anyone seen this issue with ATK Freeraider heels?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/uGbowor1F0M

Yeah, I had something similar on Crest 10. Mike Hagen gave me a new length screw assembly and I switched it out. All good now

[cat in january]

Thanks Kevino

[Westcoaster]

Got annoyed at the lack of pretty solutions to shim atk toes so cut some on the CNC. Happy to pump out some more if people are interested, for cost of materials and shipping. 3.2mm and 4.7mm for starters. 28g/pair for the 3.2, 33g/pair for the 4.7mm.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/9YRS6VorCkHpsK2E9

[Beder]

Took a fall today when I was looking at the pack of dogs headed my way instead of the re-frozen and rutted snow in front of me. The Voyager 12 (ATK FR) released exactly as I would want it to. It's probably overkill, mounted on a Zero G 95, my resort skinner. On the other hand I appreciate how it skis and that it works as it should.

[Ed el Loco]

Got annoyed at the lack of pretty solutions to shim atk toes so cut some on the CNC. Happy to pump out some more if people are interested, for cost of materials and shipping. 3.2mm and 4.7mm for starters. 28g/pair for the 3.2, 33g/pair for the 4.7mm.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/9YRS6VorCkHpsK2E9

Assuming it’s aluminum? I’m looking for some, how much?

[Westcoaster]

responded to shim PMs.

[ezgzy]

Anyone know if it’s possible to get just the heel pieces for an haute route/helio 200lt? Skimoco sells them with the plates, but i don’t really need them and would prefer to get just the towers if it’s possible


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[CaliBrit]

Anyone know if it’s possible to get just the heel pieces for an haute route/helio 200lt? Skimoco sells them with the plates, but i don’t really need them and would prefer to get just the towers if it’s possible


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Does Hagen have an equivalent? If so email Mike.

[ezgzy]

Does Hagen have an equivalent? If so email Mike.

Unfortunately not, i think BD are the only ones that had a version of these and it looks like even they might be discontinued


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[fleaches]

Anyone know if it’s possible to get just the heel pieces for an haute route/helio 200lt? Skimoco sells them with the plates, but i don’t really need them and would prefer to get just the towers if it’s possible


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Just order them with the plates, I bet you can sell the plates on here separately.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

[Westcoaster]

Cut some 3.2mm and 4.7mm shims for raider toes as well. Classic & raider shims shipping out today.