Check Out Our Shop
Page 87 of 106 FirstFirst ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... LastLast
Results 2,151 to 2,175 of 2634

Thread: Official ATK Binding Thread

  1. #2151
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven
    Posts
    291
    I used a jig from MottN to remount ATK heels to match new boots and my wife used it to mount her new ATKs. It was our first time mounting skis unsupervised (I helped Hop mount some skis several years ago) and it was easy with MottN's jig. It's also a lot cheaper than the OEM ATK jig.

    See his thread for more info:
    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...ig-(printable)

  2. #2152
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,863
    I borrow the ATK jig from a friend’s shop (sweet jig btw) but I thought Skimoco had a very complete set of template pdf’s on their site?

  3. #2153
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,117
    Does anyone know if ATK is coming out with a brake seat for the raider EVOs this year?

    Also is it mainly the incorporated toe riser that makes the voyager heavier? Or is it just a difference in how the weigh them, like including screws or something like that

  4. #2154
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by ey_allen View Post
    I scoured around, but didn't see any better deals for the feature set/weight. I grabbed a pair of C-Raider 12s from telemark-pyrenees.com for $390. Seemed too good to pass up. Plus they are orange so they'll be matchy matchy.

    The Haute Route also looked good, but my main missing feature was the magnetic risers. For some reason that seems important since I'm coming from G3s with a tendency to develop floppy risers.
    I was specifically referencing the Haute Route Plus which seems to only be available in Europe unless you want the DPS branded version. It has magnetic risers (two of them!) but as pointed out by Tjaardbeeuwer there is no elastic travel in the heel and I like the Raider toes better too. The weight difference between Raiders and HR10+ is considerable though. I started without toe shims and now have shims and like it better.

  5. #2155
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,863
    Speaking of elastic heel travel, anyone know why ATK uses a 4 mm gap for their elastic travel heel? Seems weird when Alpinists, Xenics etc are zero gap.

    Anyone running zero gap on their ATKs anyway?

  6. #2156
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    554
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason4 View Post
    I was specifically referencing the Haute Route Plus which seems to only be available in Europe unless you want the DPS branded version. It has magnetic risers (two of them!) but as pointed out by Tjaardbeeuwer there is no elastic travel in the heel and I like the Raider toes better too. The weight difference between Raiders and HR10+ is considerable though. I started without toe shims and now have shims and like it better.
    So much to learn with these derivations of the same binding.

    Thats good to know. I think I'm still very happy with my choice given the inbounds usage, but I have the Haute Route Plus on my shortlist for my more "everyday" touring skis in the future. That weight is pretty unreal.

  7. #2157
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,007
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    Does anyone know if ATK is coming out with a brake seat for the raider EVOs this year?

    Also is it mainly the incorporated toe riser that makes the voyager heavier? Or is it just a difference in how the weigh them, like including screws or something like that
    Would love if they would come out with a brake cover - evos are great but i dont really see any upside to the brake configuration (or brakes at all) and as far as i can tell there is no equivalent evo version of the regular raider brake covers yet. Its pretty difficult to flip the risers when theyre down forward after spinning the heels, and the brakes are deployed. Just another thing to remember in transitions, I guess.

  8. #2158
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    400
    FWIW, I'm planning the same setup as you, brake-less CR12s on wide boards for powder touring. Think the wider footprint will be great for driving bigger skis. Plus, I calculate CR12s ex brakes to be about 260g per binding (w/o freeride spacer, 290g with it) so not a million miles away from the sub-200g category.

    And don't worry about ATK's million item lineup, they are notorious for this haha. Just look at all the toe shims and freeride spacers they have now (on top of past models and variations)...


    Quote Originally Posted by ey_allen View Post
    So much to learn with these derivations of the same binding.

    Thats good to know. I think I'm still very happy with my choice given the inbounds usage, but I have the Haute Route Plus on my shortlist for my more "everyday" touring skis in the future. That weight is pretty unreal.

  9. #2159
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by ey_allen View Post
    So much to learn with these derivations of the same binding.

    Thats good to know. I think I'm still very happy with my choice given the inbounds usage, but I have the Haute Route Plus on my shortlist for my more "everyday" touring skis in the future. That weight is pretty unreal.
    It's hard to go wrong and easy to get lost in all of the variations. I keep looking at those HR+ thinking they'd be great for a pow touring ski but have ended up buying Raiders instead for the same reasons you did. I don't have a lot of trust in the brakes to actually stop a ski if it takes off (already had that happen once this year) so the only value I see in brakes is that it makes it easier to carry the skis on the pack or over the shoulder.

  10. #2160
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by ey_allen View Post
    So much to learn with these derivations of the same binding.

    Thats good to know. I think I'm still very happy with my choice given the inbounds usage, but I have the Haute Route Plus on my shortlist for my more "everyday" touring skis in the future. That weight is pretty unreal.
    It's hard to go wrong and easy to get lost in all of the variations. I keep looking at those HR+ thinking they'd be great for a pow touring ski but have ended up buying Raiders instead for the same reasons you did. I don't have a lot of trust in the brakes to actually stop a ski if it takes off (already had that happen once this year) so the only value I see in brakes is that it makes it easier to carry the skis on the pack or over the shoulder.

  11. #2161
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,470
    Quote Originally Posted by SB View Post
    Are those very soft skis?

    Sounds like you could be flexing the ski farther than the binding elasticity, 12mm if i recall correctly.

    Seems unlikely tho.

    I like to do hard carves on my alpine set ups.

    Maybe inspect the mounts and how the boots fit?

    Which boot are you using btw?
    Tecnica Zero G pro tour with Lange XT3 140 liners currently.

    The skis are not soft underfoot - elasticity is not the issue, more so its ability to get back or maintain the start position.

    I have adjusted the freeride spacers to fit with the sole - so an extra .6mm spacer on the outside compared to the inside and less on both than the 2.4 I started out with.

    Time will tell - I will need to do some more experimenting, or possibly change the boots as well. Thanks for the comments none the less

  12. #2162
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,790
    10-4, was talking with a buddy and we have a theory that wider skis can put higher torque on bindings. Possibly causing them to release..
    watch out for snakes

  13. #2163
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,007
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    my bad if this a dumb question, but what release values to people ski with in the heels compared to their regular alpine setups?

    I have a pair of R12 heels w/ Freeride spacers mounted on a pair of Rossi SenderFree 110s. I find that I can pop out of the heel when it is adjusted to my normal din at 8 while doing hard carves in the resort (to dial in the setup before taking them to the backcountry). I run them with Vario.2 toes that have yet to let me down.

    I increased the settings to 9 without any significant change, and will try 10 today. Obviously going up is not ideal - the idea is not to book a round trip to the ER, yet I also need to be able to trust that I stay in the bindings at mach schnell doing big arcs.

    It could of course be that the upright stance heel turning that the SF110 is so fond of is not ideally suited to tech heels, at least at the usual din.
    Lateral or vertical prerelease? If its lateral, the elasticity of the vario2 toes might be beyond the return-home range of the r12 heels. I would imagine a carving prerelease to be lateral, unless youre super frontseat in the boots...

  14. #2164
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Side WA
    Posts
    608
    Heel pin alignment can cause that release issue. Really any tech binding at the correct release setting should hold you in on hard carves so long as it isn't really chattery hardpack, so seems sketchy

  15. #2165
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,626
    Quote Originally Posted by Westcoaster View Post
    Lateral or vertical prerelease? If its lateral, the elasticity of the vario2 toes might be beyond the return-home range of the r12 heels. I would imagine a carving prerelease to be lateral, unless youre super frontseat in the boots...
    This is my worry about running frankenbindings with Trab toes

  16. #2166
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    400
    There was a lot of discussion about Trab toes vs [insert your heel] early last year in either this thread or the 300g bindings thread. Lot of heel toe physics being dropped IRC. Wonder if it would be possible to get the lateral forces definitively measured at a ski shop or factory i.e. Trab toe can move this much, heel can only move this much, beyond this, you fall out and break your legs.

  17. #2167
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    This is my worry about running frankenbindings with Trab toes
    Yeah, as much as i want to play around, this is why i wont do it. tech bindings are already sketchy, why make them sketchier?

  18. #2168
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,626
    The magic of the Trab Vario is not just the elasticity of the toe, its that the heel can be rotated much further than pretty much any other tech binding and still return to center, and the combination skis very well. There are other heelpieces that perform similarly, but most are heavier. I think the Dynafit Superlite 150 is the only other light heelpiece that performs close. Shame that the Superlite 150 toe is crap.

  19. #2169
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,029
    This may be old news (if so, sorry), but skimo.co just informed me that much-loved universal freeride spacer is going extinct.

    The "Universal Freeride Spacer" is the one that mounts directly onto the ski, so yes that's the one you want. Unfortunately we are all out of them, and ATK has discontinued it. So if you want one, I'd snag one from somewhere else before they disappear forever!
    I found a pair on BD's website, so... yeah. You know what to do. https://www.blackdiamondequipment.co...eeride-spacer/
    sproing!

  20. #2170
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Maple Falls, WA
    Posts
    689
    Why'd they discontinue it? Regardless, seems like an easy hole for 3D printer to fill, provided there's an appropriate material to use.

    Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  21. #2171
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    On another tangent.
    Posts
    4,021
    Interesting that the templates aren't readily available. Same for the freeride spacer.

    Anyhow, I downloaded the following ATK templates when developing our layout tool:


    ATK Crest 8-10

    ATK freetour-2020

    ATK R12-2.0

    ATK xFreetour-2020_new

    ATK xfreetour-2020

    ATK Kuluar-lt_brake_dima

    ATK RT8-10

    HTH
    Best regards, Terry
    (Direct Contact is best vs PMs)

    SlideWright.com
    Ski, Snowboard & Tools, Wax and Wares
    Repair, Waxing, Tuning, Mounting Tips & more
    Add TGR handle to notes & paste 5% TGR Discount code during checkout: 1121TGR

  22. #2172
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,863
    Quote Originally Posted by meter-man View Post
    This may be old news (if so, sorry), but skimo.co just informed me that much-loved universal freeride spacer is going extinct.



    I found a pair on BD's website, so... yeah. You know what to do. https://www.blackdiamondequipment.co...eeride-spacer/
    Out of stock at BD too now.
    I bought one this Nov from Skimoco, it works pretty well if you don’t switch boots with a pair of skis often. In the lowest position it barely works with my Alpinists but would be fine with higher ramp tech bindings.

    As noted by me above, ATK screwed up when choosing mounting screws for their Crest and C Raider bindings. Interestingly they also screwed up the mount screws for the Universal Spacer. The 6 screws provided had a head just a bit too wide to fit into the recessed holes. Rather than dremeling out the plastic, I bought 6 correctly sized stainless screws at hardware store.

    Like their bindings, the spacer is very nicely designed and manufactured. This is why the mount screw fail is so weird to me. It’s like buying a Bugatti Chiron and realizing that the gas tank inlet is too small for US gas nozzles.

  23. #2173
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Christchurch, NZ
    Posts
    410
    Speaking of shims... here they are, finally: https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...usp=drive_link

    There are two versions, one has a little tongue matching the crampon retainer, another has a solid platform under it. 3mf files (for those who can 3d print) are for 4mm thick shims.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20230314_Christchurch_Misc_DSC04023_small_sRGB.jpg 
Views:	94 
Size:	325.3 KB 
ID:	482356
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20230314_Christchurch_Misc_DSC04024_small_sRGB.jpg 
Views:	104 
Size:	285.7 KB 
ID:	482355
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20230314_Christchurch_Misc_DSC04025_small_sRGB.jpg 
Views:	82 
Size:	425.1 KB 
ID:	482354
    oh shit here comes the ground!

  24. #2174
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    336
    @kid-kapow
    One issue is simply that (most) tech bindings are not certified. Testing shows that most of them release at very different values than what that RV number should be in a certified binding.
    Still, ost of the ones I saw, were releasing high.

  25. #2175
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    554
    For what its worth Skimo.co has the hole measurements here: https://skimo.co/tech-binding-hole-patterns

    It seems like the C-Raider and Raider have shared the same pattern for past versions so hopefully that is true for the 2024 version as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •