Check Out Our Shop
Page 85 of 106 FirstFirst ... 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... LastLast
Results 2,101 to 2,125 of 2634

Thread: Official ATK Binding Thread

  1. #2101
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    36
    Do I need a Torx T10 or something else to unscrew the cover of the "wings" of the Freeride Spacer? I need to add some plastic spacers to close the gap. None of the bits I have seem to fit...

  2. #2102
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by andy m View Post
    I just got a pair of Crest AP bindings, and the pin delta has indeed increased -- I measured it to be about a 3.5mm increase over regular Crests, so a pin delta of 14.5mm.
    Evo heels are a little taller than their counterparts too.

  3. #2103
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by skt07 View Post
    Do I need a Torx T10 or something else to unscrew the cover of the "wings" of the Freeride Spacer? I need to add some plastic spacers to close the gap. None of the bits I have seem to fit...
    Yes. T10 is good.

    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

  4. #2104
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    704
    Yesterday I skied on a set of ATK Freeraider 14 bindings (not evo), that I had just mounted (all good) and set to 11 in the heel, which has been my standard setting on other ATKs (including Voyager XIII). I set the shim height on the heel sliding support to touch/be snug with the bottom of the boot at the heel. All looked good and proper with the set up.

    Skiing, I had many pre-releases. Multiple times where the heelpiece ejected mid turn after a compression and then clicked back in on weighting. And multiple sketchy full releases when I found a hole/unsupported snow or hard compression. One full release at high speed of one ski when going through compression whoops on a groomed/bump run. Needless to say, I have no confidence now in skiing these bindings at this setting.

    I'm wondering if the collective thinks there could be something wrong with this pair of ATK bindings. Or maybe I just need to dial them up to close to the max? I weigh 180ish, probably 190 with gear. Strong skier, like to ski fast/aggressive. But have been fine at 11 on other ATK bindings in the past. Hmmm....

  5. #2105
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by garuda View Post
    Yesterday I skied on a set of ATK Freeraider 14 bindings (not evo), that I had just mounted (all good) and set to 11 in the heel, which has been my standard setting on other ATKs (including Voyager XIII). I set the shim height on the heel sliding support to touch/be snug with the bottom of the boot at the heel. All looked good and proper with the set up.

    Skiing, I had many pre-releases. Multiple times where the heelpiece ejected mid turn after a compression and then clicked back in on weighting. And multiple sketchy full releases when I found a hole/unsupported snow or hard compression. One full release at high speed of one ski when going through compression whoops on a groomed/bump run. Needless to say, I have no confidence now in skiing these bindings at this setting.

    I'm wondering if the collective thinks there could be something wrong with this pair of ATK bindings. Or maybe I just need to dial them up to close to the max? I weigh 180ish, probably 190 with gear. Strong skier, like to ski fast/aggressive. But have been fine at 11 on other ATK bindings in the past. Hmmm....
    What boots? I just switched from an older pair of boots to the newest version of the same boots and had my ATKs release on nothing but manky snow on my first turn. I assumed I had some snow packed up somewhere that I failed to clear when I transitioned and didn't think much more of it. I've never really had a problem with them before and haven't skied the new boots enough to see a trend yet but it caught me by surprise.

  6. #2106
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,007
    Quote Originally Posted by garuda View Post
    Yesterday I skied on a set of ATK Freeraider 14 bindings (not evo), that I had just mounted (all good) and set to 11 in the heel, which has been my standard setting on other ATKs (including Voyager XIII). I set the shim height on the heel sliding support to touch/be snug with the bottom of the boot at the heel. All looked good and proper with the set up.

    Skiing, I had many pre-releases. Multiple times where the heelpiece ejected mid turn after a compression and then clicked back in on weighting. And multiple sketchy full releases when I found a hole/unsupported snow or hard compression. One full release at high speed of one ski when going through compression whoops on a groomed/bump run. Needless to say, I have no confidence now in skiing these bindings at this setting.

    I'm wondering if the collective thinks there could be something wrong with this pair of ATK bindings. Or maybe I just need to dial them up to close to the max? I weigh 180ish, probably 190 with gear. Strong skier, like to ski fast/aggressive. But have been fine at 11 on other ATK bindings in the past. Hmmm....
    That seems like a binding spring issue to me. I would contact bd/atk and maybe do some floor testing.

  7. #2107
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    704
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason4 View Post
    What boots? I just switched from an older pair of boots to the newest version of the same boots and had my ATKs release on nothing but manky snow on my first turn. I assumed I had some snow packed up somewhere that I failed to clear when I transitioned and didn't think much more of it. I've never really had a problem with them before and haven't skied the new boots enough to see a trend yet but it caught me by surprise.
    I just realized I forgot to adjust the vertical RV to match the lateral. So hopefully my problem will be fixed by cranking that up.

  8. #2108
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    612
    Quote Originally Posted by garuda View Post
    I just realized I forgot to adjust the vertical RV to match the lateral. So hopefully my problem will be fixed by cranking that up.
    I was just about to say this. Because I did the same thing


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #2109
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven
    Posts
    291
    My RVs were all as expected, I'll continue to think my issue was a one-off mistake on my part.

  10. #2110
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    4

    freeride spacer missing lugs

    I just got these bindings installed, and the freeride spacer happens to fall exactly between gaps in the lugs on my boots, so there's just air.

    Anyone dealt with this at all? Should I glue a plastic shim to my boot soles?

  11. #2111
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,938
    Quote Originally Posted by ChainDriveStrider View Post
    I just got these bindings installed, and the freeride spacer happens to fall exactly between gaps in the lugs on my boots, so there's just air.

    Anyone dealt with this at all? Should I glue a plastic shim to my boot soles?
    Can’t say I’ve seen this before. Can you post a picture?

  12. #2112
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,929
    Anyone got a source (or stash) for 18mm long ATK screws. I have alpine 18.5s but the pan head seems bigger (doesn't sit as snuggly in the fitting) than the included screws. Trying to add some shims...

  13. #2113
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,470
    does anyboby have any info on the new Tecton killer from ATK that is to be launched at some future date?

  14. #2114
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    gamehendge
    Posts
    1,315
    How do you guys lube and clean your bindings?

    I put away my fr14 last year with some spring dirt in them. They are a bit bound up and need some cleaning and lube.

    Suggested way to clean, then lube them?

  15. #2115
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    5,069
    Atk has a video. I just put a little extra on and clean it up after rotating the heel

  16. #2116
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    does anyboby have any info on the new Tecton killer from ATK that is to be launched at some future date?
    Whaaaaaat?

  17. #2117
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Van-groovey
    Posts
    205
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    Anyone got a source (or stash) for 18mm long ATK screws. I have alpine 18.5s but the pan head seems bigger (doesn't sit as snuggly in the fitting) than the included screws. Trying to add some shims...
    Turn down the alpine pan heads

  18. #2118
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,790
    How hard is it to swap different sized brakes?

    I found a discount deal on C raider 12 binders with 107 brakes.
    watch out for snakes

  19. #2119
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    5,069
    Pretty darn easy

  20. #2120
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,390
    Quote Originally Posted by SB View Post
    How hard is it to swap different sized brakes?

    I found a discount deal on C raider 12 binders with 107 brakes.
    Assuming brake units are same as the FR, it's easy with a T10 driver

  21. #2121
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Alta Wydaho
    Posts
    497
    Ok - tempted to jump over to ATK's on the new set of Nocta's - would be the FR15's. These would be be doing double duty as a powday tour setup and pow resort day/sidecountry laps out of the 'ghee. Would they do the trick OK and not be too fiddly/troublesome? Been using Shift13 on the Bent120's these would be replacing. I'm 185lbs and don't huck, all boots are tech ready.....

  22. #2122
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Middle of Norway.
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by GravityDT View Post
    Ok - tempted to jump over to ATK's on the new set of Nocta's - would be the FR15's. These would be be doing double duty as a powday tour setup and pow resort day/sidecountry laps out of the 'ghee. Would they do the trick OK and not be too fiddly/troublesome? Been using Shift13 on the Bent120's these would be replacing. I'm 185lbs and don't huck, all boots are tech ready.....
    Out of all the pin bindings I've skied in the resort, which admittedly aren't that many, atk is not very fiddly.

    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk

  23. #2123
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by arild View Post
    Out of all the pin bindings I've skied in the resort, which admittedly aren't that many, atk is not very fiddly.

    Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk
    Agreed. I have FR14’s and Tectons and find the FR14’s less fiddly than the Tectons - easier for me to step into the toe and don’t have to push down both heel and toe on the FR14‘s. Tectons might ski slightly better (they seem about the same for me though) and it has toe release adjustment vs FR14’s.

    But with the new FR15’s adding toe release and getting rid of the brake button I would probably go FR15 Evo over Tectons.

    Curious about the ATK Tecton killer mentioned above. For me the FR15 Evos are that already.

  24. #2124
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by skt07 View Post
    Agreed. I have FR14’s and Tectons and find the FR14’s less fiddly than the Tectons - easier for me to step into the toe and don’t have to push down both heel and toe on the FR14‘s. Tectons might ski slightly better (they seem about the same for me though) and it has toe release adjustment vs FR14’s.

    But with the new FR15’s adding toe release and getting rid of the brake button I would probably go FR15 Evo over Tectons.

    Curious about the ATK Tecton killer mentioned above. For me the FR15 Evos are that already.
    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but a page or two back, I asked for confirmation about the new Raider toe. The 'DIN' toe varies the clamping pressure to allow for better retention - to keep from shocking out.

    There is no release from the toe.

    So, select higher clamping force at the toe for higher lateral RVs set at the heel, and lower values for lower RVs.

    My takeaway was the 'more reliable release' claims are that an otherwise 'too high' clamping pressure set at the toe would inhibit lateral release at the heel when set for lower RV settings.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  25. #2125
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un View Post
    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but a page or two back, I asked for confirmation about the new Raider toe. The 'DIN' toe varies the clamping pressure to allow for better retention - to keep from shocking out.

    There is no release from the toe.

    So, select higher clamping force at the toe for higher lateral RVs set at the heel, and lower values for lower RVs.

    My takeaway was the 'more reliable release' claims are that an otherwise 'too high' clamping pressure set at the toe would inhibit lateral release at the heel when set for lower RV settings.

    ... Thom
    Question for Thom but perhaps anyone else. I searched but can't find an answer. Why is the ATK toe called a "DIN' toe? The only tech binding with DIN is Shift.

    Is it ATKs own documents? I can't find a ref

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •