Check Out Our Shop
Page 83 of 106 FirstFirst ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... LastLast
Results 2,051 to 2,075 of 2634

Thread: Official ATK Binding Thread

  1. #2051
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    55
    Cross-posting from the big-guy touring thread to get a few more eyes on it:

    Anyone have a proper big guy comparison on ATK Freeraiders/Moment Voyagers vs. CAST? Obviously very, very different setups but I'm intrigued by the idea of having at least one lighter touring ski with ATK's as opposed to running my current multiple skis with CAST.

    I've been generally happy with CAST after coming from dukes (bad at everything) and shifts (pre-release issues), but would love to get away from the CAST changeover faff, brakes popping down, carrying toe pieces, etc. - particularly on longer days without a lift or sled assist.

    I'm looking specifically for any experiences from bigger guys skiing more aggressively and/or hucking. I'm ~215lbs and a typical day of touring does usually include a few consequential pillow lines and/or a few 20'-30' hucks (albeit with soft landings). I've run pivots on DIN 12 for a decade plus with zero issues but it's not like I need to run 16+, so I'm well aware that I'm not that rad. Am I going to be sorely disappointed going to ATKs, pre-release everywhere, and brake my shit in a season or do I just need to accept that I'm slowly wearing down and don't actually need pivots everywhere?

  2. #2052
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,007
    Quote Originally Posted by flatland View Post
    Cross-posting from the big-guy touring thread to get a few more eyes on it:

    Anyone have a proper big guy comparison on ATK Freeraiders/Moment Voyagers vs. CAST? Obviously very, very different setups but I'm intrigued by the idea of having at least one lighter touring ski with ATK's as opposed to running my current multiple skis with CAST.

    I've been generally happy with CAST after coming from dukes (bad at everything) and shifts (pre-release issues), but would love to get away from the CAST changeover faff, brakes popping down, carrying toe pieces, etc. - particularly on longer days without a lift or sled assist.

    I'm looking specifically for any experiences from bigger guys skiing more aggressively and/or hucking. I'm ~215lbs and a typical day of touring does usually include a few consequential pillow lines and/or a few 20'-30' hucks (albeit with soft landings). I've run pivots on DIN 12 for a decade plus with zero issues but it's not like I need to run 16+, so I'm well aware that I'm not that rad. Am I going to be sorely disappointed going to ATKs, pre-release everywhere, and brake my shit in a season or do I just need to accept that I'm slowly wearing down and don't actually need pivots everywhere?
    You'll break yourself or a binding skiing pin bindings like that at 215#.

  3. #2053
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by Westcoaster View Post
    You'll break yourself or a binding skiing pin bindings like that at 215#.
    This is actually the exact answer I needed from the internet this morning to save me $1000.

  4. #2054
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    On another tangent.
    Posts
    4,021
    http://www.slidewright.com/Bindings/ATK/ATK_Hole_Comparisons.png[/IMG]

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpinord View Post
    Yes:

    Attachment 474147

    When making the ATK SlideWright Binding Layout Tool, I combined multiple ATK templates to generate the layout for the above ATK flavors (bottom of image). If you'd like the basis template for the layout tool, let me know and I'll clean it up.
    Best regards, Terry
    (Direct Contact is best vs PMs)

    SlideWright.com
    Ski, Snowboard & Tools, Wax and Wares
    Repair, Waxing, Tuning, Mounting Tips & more
    Add TGR handle to notes & paste 5% TGR Discount code during checkout: 1121TGR

  5. #2055
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Beder View Post
    FR 14 still available for about $440. This is the previous model with the push button brake release. The new Evo model does away with the button.

    https://www.oliunid.com/atk-fr14-ski...34=11238&92=28

    Is the evo without the brake release button worth it? I must admit seeing that brake button feature in a YouTube video was less than appealing.
    seeker of sastrugi

  6. #2056
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,626
    Quote Originally Posted by Irlts View Post
    Is the evo without the brake release button worth it? I must admit seeing that brake button feature in a YouTube video was less than appealing.
    If you care about the brakes you should get the new version. The button version that all ATK bindings had until the new Evos came out this year are super light but can be annoying to use.

  7. #2057
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    399

    Official ATK Binding Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by flatland View Post
    … would love to get away from the CAST changeover faff, brakes popping down, carrying toe pieces, etc. - particularly on longer days without a lift or sled assist.
    Start touring with splitboarders and that frustration will be mitigated /s

  8. #2058
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Fairhaven
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by dub_xion View Post
    Start touring with splitboarders and that frustration will be mitigated /s
    I've had less problems with my Phantom bindings in 8 years of use than I've had with skiers transitions with CAST or Shifts in a season. I'm always ready to help my partners finish fiddling with their tech bindings after I'm done with my split transition.

    The only problem I've had with ATK with the previous version of Raider brakes was forgetting to release the brakes when I'm skiing. Without the freeride pads I could whack the button with my pole but I haven't been able to get it with the pads in place.

  9. #2059
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,479
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    If you care about the brakes you should get the new version. The button version that all ATK bindings had until the new Evos came out this year are super light but can be annoying to use.
    Anyone know details on the new AP version of the Raider and C-Raider?
    Looks like old bindings with some variation of new brakes without the button
    Little bit lighter than EVO (comparing 12 vs 13)

  10. #2060
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Side WA
    Posts
    608
    Quote Originally Posted by flatland View Post
    This is actually the exact answer I needed from the internet this morning to save me $1000.
    On actually soft snow, you should be able to get away with some pretty big airs on a heavier-duty pin setup (like the Freeraider or Alpinist, Plum Yak, ). Maybe get yourself one for when you want to go for a long walk, and save the CAST for the huck fests. Pin bindings are quite strong. Just my 2 cents.

    Breaking yourself is another question....

  11. #2061
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Side WA
    Posts
    608
    Quote Originally Posted by flatland View Post
    This is actually the exact answer I needed from the internet this morning to save me $1000.
    Oh I'd also add that the Dynafit Rotation binding, while heavy and fiddly, worked for me quite well for a few seasons. Good retention in all conditions let me ski without ever locking the toe, elastic, probably safer than other pin bindings. You might like that one. I'm 6'1" and 180 lbs, so not super heavy, but still skied these pretty darn hard.

  12. #2062
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    FR&CH
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpnz View Post
    Anyone know details on the new AP version of the Raider and C-Raider?
    Looks like old bindings with some variation of new brakes without the button
    Little bit lighter than EVO (comparing 12 vs 13)
    Quote Originally Posted by stuntmanbo View Post
    Just asked them on IG about the difference between the AP and EVO brake system, FYI

    On the AP models you need to hold down the rear pedal as you turn the head of the binding, as shown here. With the EVO Brake System there's no need for that. By rotating the head of the binding by 180 degrees, the ski brake activates. At that point, you simply step-in to lock the brake

    Personally I'm fine with the old system.

    Video here :
    https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cy3WHLQooEB/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
    xxx

  13. #2063
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    They continue in their effort to proliferate confusion. As I look back at post #1, and my attempt to "connect" the various mashups into some sort of logical scheme, I know why I never returned to that project. All hope is lost ;-)

    Great binders, however.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  14. #2064
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,790
    These NG pin binders are quite capable, if you ski within reason. At 6’ and 215 lbs I have done rock hops, ie small jumps, in pow with zero issues. And this on older Dfit tech binders.

    I really want to give the ATKs a try but have two sets of Dfit rotations in box waiting for skis.
    watch out for snakes

  15. #2065
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    938
    Quote Originally Posted by Westcoaster View Post
    You'll break yourself or a binding skiing pin bindings like that at 215#.
    I’m 200lbs and have the 105g World Cup binding on my matchsticks. I’ve skied those things hard on the verge of control and incredible how solid it is. I’m guessing the 400g Freeraider can take a lot of punishment!!!

  16. #2066
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,839
    Any concerns with using the freeride spacers without brakes? Looks like even when the brakes are attached the two pedestals on the outside take all the force from the boot, but wanted to check and see if I'm missing something.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5199.jpg 
Views:	204 
Size:	1.54 MB 
ID:	476268
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  17. #2067
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whitefish
    Posts
    1,249
    Respectfully , that’s the point of the spacer.

  18. #2068
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,839
    Quote Originally Posted by kevino View Post
    Respectfully , that’s the point of the spacer.
    No disrespect taken, this is my first foray into ATK bindings so the only thing i'm sure of is my ignorance. Thanks for the confirmation!
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  19. #2069
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,864
    Ordered some freeraider 12s, curious if anyone does yo-yo pow laps without ever rotating the heel piece. I’ve grown accustomed to / spoiled by the easy pole-activated transition to flat tour mode with my Alpinists and Vipecs.

  20. #2070
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,312
    Quote Originally Posted by soul_skier View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_5199.jpg 
Views:	204 
Size:	1.54 MB 
ID:	476268
    ATK offer brake seat covers to fill the gap when the brakes are removed to stop it collecting snow/icing up.
    https://www.thepisteoffice.com/index...t-cover-detail

  21. #2071
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BLDR CO
    Posts
    1,171
    I'll start by admitting my soon certain death... But with a pair of Trofeo+'s in hand and a pile of BF inserts, I'm going to pull the trigger on adding Trofe heel inserts to two pairs of skis that I already have FR14 insert mounts on. The franken FR14 toe/Trofe+ heel has a reasonable 6.5mm ramp angle, wider toe pattern and only ~30 gr more than going full Trofeo+. Having both heels adds some nice optionality on weight, brakes, FR spacer. Anyway, nerdy pre-season stuff

  22. #2072
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,938
    Quote Originally Posted by tang View Post
    I'll start by admitting my soon certain death... But with a pair of Trofeo+'s in hand and a pile of BF inserts, I'm going to pull the trigger on adding Trofe heel inserts to two pairs of skis that I already have FR14 insert mounts on. The franken FR14 toe/Trofe+ heel has a reasonable 6.5mm ramp angle, wider toe pattern and only ~30 gr more than going full Trofeo+. Having both heels adds some nice optionality on weight, brakes, FR spacer. Anyway, nerdy pre-season stuff
    What two skis are you doing this on? Not to question the nerdy pre-season tinkering, but I wonder what the reasoning behind swapping heels on certain days and conditions. Wouldn't having the Trofeo on a lighter pair of sticks and FR14s on the more versatile skis be enough? How much do you save weight wise swapping heels? ~150g per ski? Is it all about having the spacer on the lighter skis some days? Or having the Raider toe with the Trofeo heel?

  23. #2073
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    BLDR CO
    Posts
    1,171
    Good questions!
    First, it starts with just being an insert nerd and the cost just being time and $15/ski pair for inserts.

    The trofeos are primarily for a pending pair of new lighter spring skis - hopefully m-vertical 88s if I can get hands on some.

    I’ll be also adding the trofe heel inserts to a pair of down cd104Ls (1500 gr) and praxis gpo’s (2250 gr). The GPOs will have alpine binders and maybe just these frankens, not fr14 and Frankenstein. Haven’t actually mounted those yet.)
    Reasoning is weight (yeah 150 ish per foot) and some travel versatility as these two skis is what I’ll bring on multi week bc lodge + resorts trips. GPOs for any backcountry is probably pow meadow skipping, so saving a little weight helps there, and wider toes helps on pretty wide ski.

    The fr14 and trofeo are obviously pretty different but 90% of the diff is in the heels of course.

  24. #2074
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    321
    This is not atk, but i’ve been thinking about doing the same thing for kingpins and alpinists. Keep the toe the same, but have a much beefier heel available for harder skiing/occasional resort use


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #2075
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    306
    Does anyone know if the AL12 toe shim fits the C-Raider 12? Or is it only for the ordinary R's and FR's? I see it has two different hole patterns.

    Edit: Contacted ATK, and no, the AL12 does not fit the C-Raider. They do not have any shims that fit that toe piece.
    Last edited by Adrgha; 11-22-2023 at 05:14 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •