Most of the online photos I see of alpine ski hot boxing show the bindings still on. Clearly some people leave the bindings on. quite a few.
I had this discussion with racers on PugSki. Most seem to think the grease in bindings doesn't break down at 140-150 degrees. I find that hard to believe
Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!
If that did happen, it's not hard to put more grease in there.
I've hot boxed hundreds of pairs of skis with the bindings on for four hours at 150F/65C with absolutely no ill affect on the binding grease, or anything else.
how about warming chicken Tika Masala, the most popular takaway in england, you know ... because brits can't cook
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
A properly engineered coil spring (for any application) should really not suffer any metal fatigue (with the possible exception of corrosion-induced fatigue, or forces outside design parameters, etc).
As alluded to earlier: I would suspect every single other moving part on the binding, before assuming it's the springs.
Wouldn't boot wear, lubrication break down, road grime etc all cause bindings to test high. The OP's toes are testing 2 numbers low.
I don't know this binding (I realize not knowing Pivots is grounds for being banned)--is toe height adjustable? Although I assume any shop testing bindings would make sure that's correct and I wouldn't expect loose toe height to cause that far out of spec.
When faced with a test result you can't explain, consider retesting (at a different shop).
OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
Not clear but did the OP have these tested when new? Could have been 2 out the whole time rather than something going off?
OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
Every time.
update: Picked up a better set of used mogul skis and had new Look 14 bindings installed. The toes test +0.5 DIN and the heels test -0.5 DIN.
All I can guess is that the deviation from the previous set to this set is related to boot sole wear and binding wear. The boots are a little worn (walking wear) and don't sit 100% flat anymore. I suppose that is why the toes need adjusting upwards. Heels? I have no idea. The tester tested them, adjusted them, cycled them several times and says that the answer is "All bindings test on/off spec and there is no single factor why. Even new boots with new bindings often test +/- to rated DIN by more than 1 DIN. "
It just freaked me out because I don't want toes that never release! I will sleep better now knowing that the shop guy cycled them, adjusted forward pressure and retested them.
Now I just need to learn to ski moguls! :P
OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
A tech should be able to give your a equipment the occular pat down and pass or fail it.
The fact that it doesn't sit flat doesn't sound good, but the fact that the bindings show the same release value every time is good. That can be easily corrected for. It seems there is quite a bit of tolerance in the system as a whole and that means wear and tear, ranges of forward pressure, and (hopefully slight) variations in actual release values. Nevermind the effects of ski flex and centrifugal force, torque, impacts, etc.
Unfortunately, no one has figured out a safer way.
Bookmarks