Touring Friends: Soft Shell or Hard Shell Pants?

[PeachesNCream]

Looking to buy some touring pants and read a lot of debate on soft shell vs hard shell pants. I understand that hard shell = more waterproof and soft shell = more breathability but curious to hear what you guys use and why?

[mall walker]

Probably depends a lot on where you are and what time of year you mean, I suspect mid-winter PNW is a lot different than mid-winter Utah. I use OR Trailbreakers and they're perfect for me, but I tour pretty much exclusively in dry snow climates...

[doebedoe]

I dig my Flylow Magnum Pros or whatever they are called. "Softshell" but with a WPB membrane layer so "waterproof". Internal and external vents.

Agree though it depends mostly on where you're touring.

[3PinGrin]

Probably depends a lot on where you are and what time of year you mean, I suspect mid-winter PNW is a lot different than mid-winter Utah. I use OR Trailbreakers and they're perfect for me, but I tour pretty much exclusively in dry snow climates...

This --^

Mammut Champ has been my touring / hunting pant for several years. Schoeller fabric with limited wind resistance but drys super fast. No waterproofness. Perfect for dry MT / ID / UT snow but would likely be the wrong choice for PNW. If I'm expecting wet snow I throw in a pair of inexpensive/light rain pants but hardly ever need them. Never had a problem hiking in a snowstorm in these unless it's really wet. I love the breathability (and quietness for hunting).

I think you need to restart the poll to get an appropriate response based on location.

[PeachesNCream]

Probably depends a lot on where you are and what time of year you mean, I suspect mid-winter PNW is a lot different than mid-winter Utah. I use OR Trailbreakers and they're perfect for me, but I tour pretty much exclusively in dry snow climates...

Well currently in PNW, but moving to Idaho next year. Yeah, keep hearing these Trailbreakers being brought up

[3PinGrin]

Well currently in PNW, but moving to Idaho next year. Yeah, keep hearing these Trailbreakers being brought up

Well, depending on where you are in Idaho can make a difference. The panhandle can get much more of a maritime type snow whereas the southern part of the state is pretty dry snow. The trailbreakers would be a great choice for the drier part of the state IMO.

[PeachesNCream]

This --^

Mammut Champ has been my touring / hunting pant for several years. Schoeller fabric with limited wind resistance but drys super fast. No waterproofness. Perfect for dry MT / ID / UT snow but would likely be the wrong choice for PNW. If I'm expecting wet snow I throw in a pair of inexpensive/light rain pants but hardly ever need them. Never had a problem hiking in a snowstorm in these unless it's really wet. I love the breathability (and quietness for hunting).

I think you need to restart the poll to get an appropriate response based on location.

I like you're idea of throwing in a pair of rain pants, I already have a pair and find myself craving breathability over waterproof

[3PinGrin]

I like you're idea of throwing in a pair of rain pants, I already have a pair and find myself craving breathability over waterproof

Yep, breathability is king in my book. I've weathered some pretty serious snow storms without the rain pants, but have really appreciated them when bucking through wet brush or dealing with really wet heavy snow coming down. The Schoeller fabric dries really fast.

[altacoup]

I'll second OR trailbreakers. Great touring pant. Good pocket layout, sweet gaiters for booting and not having pant leg ride up. Perfect touring pants. But I have used gore tex pro material pants in the pnw and Alaska and it works great in wet climates.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[hafjell]

Strafe Cham2 pants.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[Rob Stokes]

I just got some Patagonia snow guide pants, used them a couple times. Slightly tight cuffs around my Vulcans with the cuffs open wide, but other than that real nice pants.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[TeleBeaver]

Another vote for OR trailbreakers. Touring in Utah/Colorado. They have little sleeves over the knees thst you can slip some closed cell foam into for extra warmth and for comfort when kneeling in the snow doing various backcountry things.

[riff]

Trailbreakers here too. PNW, about 60 days on them this season. Decent build, decent zippers and pocket placement. I’ve put some damage on them, but reasonable for the amount of use. I could use a bit more room in the legs, but hey.
I toured in hardshell the other day and was amazed how much I preferred soft shell.
in storm conditions I’m finding that the superior breathability helps dry em out quicker.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[macon]

Maritime snow, so I favor hardshells. I use Mountain Hardwear cyclone pants.

Polartec Neoshell, lots of stretch, and tons of mechanical venting. Honestly would probably prefer this over many softshell options in most climates.

[PNWbrit]

both... or either.

[nickwm21]

OR needs to make a trailbreaker with goretex knees, seat, and gators.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[auvgeek]

My general response to questions like this is: if you have to ask, wear what your most experienced touring partners wear.

As others have said, hardshell for maritime snow, softshell for dryer climates. I have one of each, but wear my softshell way, way more in CO. Personally, I like the Arcteryx Procline FL (now discontinued but supposedly replaced by the Rush FL but the vents seem a bit different), and the stinger pant. If I were to do it again, I might consider a bib for the hardshell pant. YMMV.

I haven't tried any of the hybrid pants with hardshell in the seat, knees, and gaiter, like nick mentions OR should do in the trailbreaker

[PNWbrit]

OR needs to make a trailbreaker with goretex knees, seat, and gators.

Aren't most crocodilians reasonably well waterproofed already?

[dunfree]

I like you're idea of throwing in a pair of rain pants, I already have a pair and find myself craving breathability over waterproof

it's a decent gear setup for touring.. not yoyoing. the problem with this strategy, is imo, it's hard to find a good pair of rain pants for the role. Ideally you want full side zips & a reinforced inner cuff. that combo's kinda rare these days and usually pricey.

[XXX-er]

My general response to questions like this is: if you have to ask, wear what your most experienced touring partners wear.

As others have said, hardshell for maritime snow, softshell for dryer climates. I have one of each, but wear my softshell way, way more in CO. Personally, I like the Arcteryx Procline FL (now discontinued but supposedly replaced by the Rush FL but the vents seem a bit different

yes this ^^ is a very good pant, don't know why they disco'ed it maybe cuz it was kinda pricey

very good gaitors the only thing missing is another pocket

kinda pricey but it was worth paying for the best IME cuz I got them due to a warranty credit from Arcterxy

which was more than what I paid for my old softshell pants

[rod9301]

it's a decent gear setup for touring.. not yoyoing. the problem with this strategy, is imo, it's hard to find a good pair of rain pants for the role. Ideally you want full side zips & a reinforced inner cuff. that combo's kinda rare these days and usually pricey.

Marmot makes some pants this, very inexpensive

Sent from my Armor_3 using Tapatalk

[3PinGrin]

it's a decent gear setup for touring.. not yoyoing. the problem with this strategy, is imo, it's hard to find a good pair of rain pants for the role. Ideally you want full side zips & a reinforced inner cuff. that combo's kinda rare these days and usually pricey.

True softshells are perfectly fine for yoyoing, the rain pants just stay in the pack most the time. Easy to find cheap side zip rain pants and they don't have to be all that durable if used infrequently.

[auvgeek]

yes this ^^ is a very good pant, don't know why they disco'ed it maybe cuz it was kinda pricey

very good gaitors the only thing missing is another pocket

kinda pricey but it was worth paying for the best IME cuz I got them due to a warranty credit from Arcterxy

which was more than what I paid for my old softshell pants

Yep. A dedicated beacon pocket on up on the hip would have made them just about perfect IMHO.

The replacement Rush FL is also super pricey so I doubt that had anything to do with it. As far as I can tell, they switched fabrics (which I'm neutral on), made the pocket location worse (negative), and removed the mesh backing on the vents (minor negative since I like to wear these with just wool boxers without displaying some hairy man-leg). So yeah, I'll be bummed when my Procline FL wear out.

[kootenayskier]

Softshells for both maximum breathability and reduced striding resistance. I’ve found Windstopper softshells add a little weather protection (over non-membrane softshell) and handle the full range of conditions I expect to find when touring.

[summit]

I have never understood the OOOH BREATHABLE allure of softshells. People who love that must just have different physiology than me.

For me, if I am perspiring at more than the breathability of a performance hardshell, I AM FUCKING HOT. I don't need better breathability, I NEED VENTS so I cool down and can continue to exert myself and not sweat like a pig. I can't work as hard when I'm hot!

Someone tell me where I am wrong?