Skied the 92s as my primary ski here on the east coast all season. It replaced a Ranger 94FR. Much more planted than that ski, the 92 is quite composed at speed especially in a little chop. Carving performance is better than the 94FR, for sure—better edge hold, but not as much pop turn to turn. It cannot replace my 65mm beer league race ski, though, for sure. But for how approachable it feels, it carves nicely. Feels longer radius than stated, imo.
I also have an older enforcer 100, and I feel like that ski is a better comparison than the 94FR. The 92 feels a lot quicker obviously, and has better edge hold, and is slightly more punishing if you get back. But both skis can rail turns at speed and then are easily released in tight spots.
Bookmarks