Yup that’s what I see in Maine. Lots of homeless folks in Portland with its resources. Zero here in the small midcoast town. Drug problem here is pretty bad-lobstering is a cash industry requiring no education.
Yup that’s what I see in Maine. Lots of homeless folks in Portland with its resources. Zero here in the small midcoast town. Drug problem here is pretty bad-lobstering is a cash industry requiring no education.
Anecdotal observations only on my end. Maybe there’s a social bond with others in the same kinda situation? The homeless in Juneau often were in groups to some extent. Not sure about the big metro area dynamics.
I think there are plenty of homeless in small towns like the one I live in. But most are couch surfing with friends or family, and fewer in tent camps. Still homeless, but with a bit more ‘grass roots’ support perhaps? Certainly less govt and NGO social services available once you are a couple day’s walk from the more populous centres (>5000 pop or so)
Some news reports that provide some insights.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...nd-and-to-help
https://www.axios.com/2020/02/05/hom...america-cities
It appears that due to the pandemic allowing those with resources to take advantage of cheaper housing in rural areas, homelessness in rural areas may be increasing faster than in urban areas.
I'm not sure I understand your point. HUD data referenced in the one report show that Kentucky had a higher increase in homelessness (10.9%) than in Los Angeles (9%).
Pre-pandemic numbers showed that almost 1/5th of homelessness occurred in rural areas - https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites...HAR-Part-1.pdf
IMO, this accurate. When one becomes homeless in a rural area there is a far greater liklihood of having family or friends to let you crash on the couch/basement, but when folks are in bigger city's they are likely away from family and housed friends. there is less of a family/friend safety net in bigger affluent cities, than their is in more rural less populated areas. So homelessness is more visible in bigger cities than it is in more rural areas. Thats my theory on it.
When you ban people from camping then they go somewhere else and camp. When every place bans camping you are banning people from existing. Unless you decide to incarcerate them which is a whole lot more expensive than providing housing.
Sinclair is a nationwide conservative media ownership group that has a history of pushing editorials on its local stations without identifying the “reports” as such
[eta]here is the same news via the NYT indicating no untoward Sinclair influence in your orig link
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/27/u...e=articleShare
The worry I have if all these places allow homeless to be booted without housing available is that they will be given bus tickets to portland
Upton Sinclair is rolling in his grave.
Welcome to the jungle v2
The person who has an encampment across the street, who's kids can't play in the park, or feel safe walking the neighborhood: "So what"
Honestly, a large percentage of the homeless that are mentally ill and/or addicts, need to be institutionalized, but it seems that ship has sailed.
^those aren’t nervous chuckles from those 2
Bookmarks