Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 17 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 414

Thread: Title 9 is dead

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,821
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    How would this work, though? At the highest level it would be all those who were born male. No woman would ever win an Olympic medal again.
    Medal for each category? Cis Male, trans male, etc...

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,502
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSilverSurfer View Post
    Medal for each category? Cis Male, trans male, etc...
    You could do that, but it would certainly de-value the medals a bit. How many world caliber trans lugers--for example--are there really going to be? Do you really deserve an Olympic gold medal because you're the only trans luger in the world?

    My opinion would be that if you decide to change your sex through surgery and/or drugs you have to accept that your life is going to change radically. Part of that change may be that you can no longer participate in athletics at certain levels because it's unfair to the other competitors.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,875
    https://www.bicycling.com/news/a4454...sgender-women/

    …goes into many aspects of this topic.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Magically whisked away to...Delaware
    Posts
    3,617
    I was unaware/surprised that there are male/female divisions in chess? Is this actually an issue? What’s the logic?

    I get “athletics,” but why would any of the arguments matter in chess?


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    It makes perfect sense...until you think about it.

    I suspect there's logic behind the madness, but I'm too dumb to see it.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,528
    Quote Originally Posted by smartyiak View Post
    I was unaware/surprised that there are male/female divisions in chess? Is this actually an issue? What’s the logic?

    I get “athletics,” but why would any of the arguments matter in chess?


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    That’s what fried my brain.
    Why women’s chess?

    It’s not physical. It’s all mental. I thought chess was chess.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Imagine the rage to come about trans women kindergarten teachers..
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,540
    Quote Originally Posted by frorider View Post
    https://www.bicycling.com/news/a4454...sgender-women/

    …goes into many aspects of this topic.
    Bravo to UCI, the topic of advantage can not be simplified to a testosterone lab value.

    Plenty of research citing continued benefit of anabolic steroids after discontinuation of use. Going through puberty with functioning Leydig cells is a huge anabolic advantage that is clinical and scientific fact.

    I agree with old goat, life isn’t always fair. We are bending rules for what, 0.25% of athletes so the rest suffer?

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,501

    Title 9 is dead

    I find it funny how everyone spends so much time worrying about that 0.25% of athletes, all competing in sports they will never, ever care about.
    Last edited by kathleenturneroverdrive; 08-20-2023 at 08:24 AM.

  9. #34
    Rasputin's Avatar
    Rasputin is online now Полые тростник на ветру
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    4,732
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSilverSurfer View Post
    As everything it depends on the parameters used, hence why I added "considering all factors". The 1.3-1.7% figure is specifically attributed to "physically identifiable traits".
    However, on the topic of transgender athletes, intersex is a bit of a red herring. Again, from Amnesty International:

    Myth 4: Intersex people are transgender.

    Being intersex has nothing to do with being transgender.
    <p>
    The universe is my country and the human family is my tribe. -Kahlil Gibran</p>

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,907
    Quote Originally Posted by Rasputin View Post
    However, on the topic of transgender athletes, intersex is a bit of a red herring. Again, from Amnesty International:

    Myth 4: Intersex people are transgender.

    Being intersex has nothing to do with being transgender.
    This discussion actually affects only half of trans folks. No one is trying to stop trans men from competing with men, lol. This issue only exists for trans women. That's it.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    In your Dreams
    Posts
    2,720
    My 13 y o grand daughter is playing tight end for the HS FB team this year at 5'9 160lbs. When I played JV O line TE as a starter I was 5' 5' 120lbs. Is that fair? Should anyone care?

    Interesting data above. 65,000 babies born each year with parts that don't match their chromosomes. Hence the speck of truth that the religious far right conspiracy mongers use saying that doctors are cutting off the penis of little boys. Yup. So what?
    Seeker of Truth. Dispenser of Wisdom. Protector of the Weak. Avenger of Evil.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    Bravo to UCI, the topic of advantage can not be simplified to a testosterone lab value.

    Plenty of research citing continued benefit of anabolic steroids after discontinuation of use. Going through puberty with functioning Leydig cells is a huge anabolic advantage that is clinical and scientific fact.

    I agree with old goat, life isn’t always fair. We are bending rules for what, 0.000025% of athletes so the rest suffer?
    Fixed it for you. We're getting outraged over latest count in my state 3 in 200K student athletes grade 6-12

    Looks like SIX in the entire state of Ohio..

    How many transgender high school athletes are there in Ohio?
    The OHSAA reports only six transgender students are currently playing on girls' sports teams in Ohio's high schools. Rep. Mary Lightbody (D-New Albany) asked about legal implications of this legislation and how this bill affects Title IX protections. Powell responded it complies with the federal civil rights law.Mar 8, 2023
    Even counting just girls teams your number is massively inflated..
    You numbers are massively inflated just like the rage over a huge nothing burger.. A solution looking for a problem. Is it fair? Probably not.. But is it a significant problem yet? Also probably not..

    Also you don't get to pad the numbers by 50% by only including girls sports. There are also biological females playing men's sports.. Wrestling, football, baseball.. Nobody seems to have a problem with that.. unless they're trans...
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,502
    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    That’s what fried my brain.
    Why women’s chess?

    It’s not physical. It’s all mental. I thought chess was chess.
    I imagine there are just a lot more men playing chess at a high level than women. Not sure why. Probably comes down to men tend to be more competitive, and/or feel the need to waste their time on things like chess and sports.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,722
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    I imagine there are just a lot more men playing chess at a high level than women. Not sure why. Probably comes down to men tend to be more competitive, and/or feel the need to waste their time on things like chess and sports.
    After watching the WC I have to disagree with the less competitive thing.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,540
    Quote Originally Posted by SumJongGuy View Post
    Fixed it for you. We're getting outraged over latest count in my state 3 in 200K student athletes grade 6-12

    Looks like SIX in the entire state of Ohio..



    You numbers are massively inflated just like the rage over a huge nothing burger.. A solution looking for a problem. Is it fair? Probably not.. But is it a significant problem yet? Also probably not..

    Also you don't get to pad the numbers by 50% by only including girls sports. There are also biological females playing men's sports.. Wrestling, football, baseball.. Nobody seems to have a problem with that.. unless they're trans...
    I was guessing on the number, I suck at math, bravo to you.

    It’s a big enough concern that the UCI, World Athletics had to address it as well as other international athletic associations. No need to get enraged at me.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,494
    Trans women have never been shown to disproportionately successful in any sport.

    The studies I've seen that show they have a physical advantage over cis women have been conducted on untrained college students. This means the studies are pretty much meaningless. At least one study comparing trans and cis women athletes showed no statistically significant advantage. Why does this make sense? Athletes aren't average. Trans youth make up a bit more than 1% of the population and most of them don't want to deal with the bullying and harassment they'll face if they play sports. So you're looking at a very small group competing against the best women. This is why trans women don't dominate any sport. Yet when a trans woman wins anything d-bags like some of you all scream about it to the hilltops as proof that women's sports are dying.

    Be honest with yourselves. You want to ban trans women because you don't think they are women. Congrats on joining forces with the White nationalists and helping to make America great again.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,028
    Quote Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds! View Post
    Trans women have never been shown to disproportionately successful in any sport.

    The studies I've seen that show they have a physical advantage over cis women have been conducted on untrained college students. This means the studies are pretty much meaningless. At least one study comparing trans and cis women athletes showed no statistically significant advantage. Why does this make sense? Athletes aren't average. Trans youth make up a bit more than 1% of the population and most of them don't want to deal with the bullying and harassment they'll face if they play sports. So you're looking at a very small group competing against the best women. This is why trans women don't dominate any sport. Yet when a trans woman wins anything d-bags like some of you all scream about it to the hilltops as proof that women's sports are dying.

    Be honest with yourselves. You want to ban trans women because you don't think they are women. Congrats on joining forces with the White nationalists and helping to make America great again.
    no. Just no.

    skiJ

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    9,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    I was guessing on the number, I suck at math, bravo to you.
    I expect 99% of trans-mathletes would embarrass you both and then be sad that their beloved numbers were dragged into it in the first place.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,722
    Quote Originally Posted by I've seen black diamonds! View Post
    Trans women have never been shown to disproportionately successful in any sport.

    The studies I've seen that show they have a physical advantage over cis women have been conducted on untrained college students. This means the studies are pretty much meaningless. At least one study comparing trans and cis women athletes showed no statistically significant advantage. Why does this make sense? Athletes aren't average. Trans youth make up a bit more than 1% of the population and most of them don't want to deal with the bullying and harassment they'll face if they play sports. So you're looking at a very small group competing against the best women. This is why trans women don't dominate any sport. Yet when a trans woman wins anything d-bags like some of you all scream about it to the hilltops as proof that women's sports are dying.

    Be honest with yourselves. You want to ban trans women because you don't think they are women. Congrats on joining forces with the White nationalists and helping to make America great again.
    This is a bullshit response about an issue that well meaning people who support trans rights take different positions on. Why stop at White nationalists? Don't you mean Nazis? Isn't banning trans women from women's sports like the Holocaust?

    And yes, in the overall scheme of things it's a minor issues but it is an important issue to the athletes involved. And so deserves a thoughtful response, not a predetermined response based on ideology.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,540
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    And so deserves a thoughtful response, not a predetermined response based on ideology.
    This is TGR, ideology is implicit, as are broad accusations. Nobody posts here expecting a thoughtful, engaging, civil discussion.

    Maybe we all need some estrogen HRT, although most here are old enough that their testosterone producing Leydig cells are becoming dysfunctional and the little testosterone they do produce is rapidly converted to estrogen by aromatase creating large, puffy, gynecomastia boobies we can all snuggle in.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,028
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    This is a bullshit response about an issue that well meaning people who support trans rights take different positions on. Why stop at White nationalists? Don't you mean Nazis? Isn't banning trans women from women's sports like the Holocaust?

    And yes, in the overall scheme of things it's a minor issues but it is an important issue to the athletes involved. And so deserves a thoughtful response, not a predetermined response based on ideology.
    while I appreciate this goat,
    I still strongly discourage comparing anything to the upheaval in the world in the 1930s and 1940s -

    regarding gender and sports , about my only interest(s) are < that there is no competitive advantage ; and
    that the rules are followed.

    Today, I think if someone wants to call themself a woman or a man, ,,, I believe as a species we have bigger problems to worry about -

    ( for someone to say others don't believe "trans women' are 'women" ,,, is just junk -

    let the 'trans women' compete with other 'trans women' -

    End of story. )

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    A man altering their body to be more feminine is no different than a woman altering her body to be more feminine. Either you belive you must roll with the body you were born with or you don't. Fake tits are fake tits.. Doesn't matter what's below them.. .. Also doesn't matter what used to be below them.. Either be OK with changing a body or don't be.. No saying it's OK for X but not for Y.
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,502
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    And yes, in the overall scheme of things it's a minor issues but it is an important issue to the athletes involved. And so deserves a thoughtful response, not a predetermined response based on ideology.
    Agreed. Sports need to be fair. That's the issue here. I'm absolutely sure there are plenty of people who don't want to see trans athletes participating just because they think it's "unnatural" or some other BS reason, but that's far from the only consideration. Women have fought very hard for a place in the sports world and athletes who participated at a high level as men just a year or two previously is simply not fair to the cis-female competitors.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    although most here are old enough that their testosterone producing Leydig cells are becoming dysfunctional and the little testosterone they do produce is rapidly converted to estrogen by aromatase creating large, puffy, gynecomastia boobies we can all snuggle in.
    So the padded room as we know it is fucked and saved all at the same time?
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    Well, I'm not allowed to delete this post, but, I can say, go fuck yourselves, everybody!

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,722
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    This is TGR, ideology is implicit, as are broad accusations. Nobody posts here expecting a thoughtful, engaging, civil discussion.

    Maybe we all need some estrogen HRT, although most here are old enough that their testosterone producing Leydig cells are becoming dysfunctional and the little testosterone they do produce is rapidly converted to estrogen by aromatase creating large, puffy, gynecomastia boobies we can all snuggle in.
    Wait--you say TGR is no place for a thoughtful discussion and then you hit us with SCIENCE? WTF? (Remind me what a Leydig cell is. It's been a while.)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •