Pinnacle Rocker/Camber Profile vs Rustler

[Kulharin]

How does the Pinnacle 95/105 early rise + rocker/camber/rocker profile compare to that of the Rustler 10/11?

[FlimFlamvanHam]

You've seen Blister's pics?


http://blistergearreview.com/gear-re...-pinnacle-95/2

And

http://blistergearreview.com/gear-re...d-rustler-10/4

I've not actually looked at the Rustler but have the p95 and was surprised by the amount of tip splay but more the depth of the rocker: it's really deep. Those pics don't do it justice. And soft.

Not sure that helps at all but based on blisters pics the rustler has way more tail rocker and says more tip although I'd be shocked if as deep as the k2.

The k2 flexes soft.

Such different skis though as the K2 is customary k2 directional with a traditional rear biased mount where the Rustler is mounted more towards centre.

[Kulharin]

Thanks for these. I guess I am wondering what ski feels/skis shorter and what has more surface contact. If I have the Pinnacle in a 184 length, I'm not sure if I'd want the 180 or 188 in the Rustler. The increased length in Rustler also comes with increased width from 102-104/112-114