Check Out Our Shop
Page 44 of 161 FirstFirst ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ... LastLast
Results 1,076 to 1,100 of 4017

Thread: The Dynastar Thread

  1. #1076
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Fernie and/or Smithers
    Posts
    1,527
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4BA326B1-FCBE-411F-B14D-D6D6E8829AFF.jpeg 
Views:	187 
Size:	443.1 KB 
ID:	352978
    Do what you like, Like what you do.

  2. #1077
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,939
    Quote Originally Posted by gwat View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4BA326B1-FCBE-411F-B14D-D6D6E8829AFF.jpeg 
Views:	187 
Size:	443.1 KB 
ID:	352978
    dude should pay us to take them away as punishment for putting a plate and Tyrolias on them, fuckin savage

    edited to add, they rang a bell so i called around, that pair was stolen from Banff a couple of years ago, owned by store owner that had no taste in bindings obviously
    the pole were his too if any mags can help in the track down i can't find the ad.
    what's orange and looks good on hippies?
    fire

    rails are for trains
    If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for problems caused by the government I'd be a rich fat film maker in a baseball hat.

    www.theguideshut.ca

  3. #1078
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Fernie and/or Smithers
    Posts
    1,527
    Craziness! Check your FB messenger.
    Do what you like, Like what you do.

  4. #1079
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    THOR-Foothills
    Posts
    6,050

    The Dynastar Thread

    They’re still on fb marketplace
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1616.JPG 
Views:	161 
Size:	671.5 KB 
ID:	352984
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1617.JPG 
Views:	150 
Size:	379.8 KB 
ID:	352985
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1618.JPG 
Views:	155 
Size:	554.8 KB 
ID:	352986

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    It doesn't matter if you're a king or a little street sweeper...
    ...sooner or later you'll dance with the reaper
    -Death

    Quote Originally Posted by St. Jerry View Post
    The other morning I was awoken to "Daddy, my fart fell on the floor"
    Kaz is my co-pilot

  5. #1080
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    The greatest N. New Mexico resort in Colorado
    Posts
    2,311
    Name:  9374CA81-5479-4F12-AE0D-EBEE84075132.gif
Views: 893
Size:  675.3 KB

  6. #1081
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    5,121
    Fuckin joey


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I rip the groomed on tele gear

  7. #1082
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,939
    i sent a message saying i was interested
    what's orange and looks good on hippies?
    fire

    rails are for trains
    If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for problems caused by the government I'd be a rich fat film maker in a baseball hat.

    www.theguideshut.ca

  8. #1083
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins
    Posts
    803
    This should be interesting... Name:  tenor (1).gif
Views: 850
Size:  101.8 KB

    Sent from my Redmi Note 8 Pro using Tapatalk

  9. #1084
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,030

    The Dynastar Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    glad that you chimed in KC - I was planning to ask you for thoughts on how R11s and MPs compare, so can't wait for your thoughts
    My last two ski days at Whistler I did one day on my 2019 180cm Rustler 11s (mounted at +1cm = -6.7cm) then today on my new (last years 2020) 180cm Dynastar Protos (mounted at +3cm = -6.1cm).

    Me 5’7”, 165 lbs.

    One caveat. I’ve had quite a few days on the R11s. They make bad snow skiable. They make me ski better. Everywhere. Only one full day so far on the Protos....today was some windblown fresh, some deeper stuff that was pretty nice...this is the Dynastar thread so here’s my initial thoughts on them.

    Fuck do the Protos turn/pivot?! It seems crazy for a ski with that much camber to be able to pivot like they do. After today all I can say is that Protos really excel (so so easy to turn) in really steep terrain and in untracked pow. Eg we were pretty close to first into Saudan when 7th opened with fresh snow that hadn’t been skied. The Protos loved the steep pitch. Haven’t felt a ski that felt better when you’re mid turn in steep untracked pow, pole pointing downhill for the next turn and you just hold hold hold the turn as the pow blows up over your downhill ski into your face. They have something? And they look f’ing cool. So ya they are magic in steep untouched pow.

    They were also great in sketchy stuff that requires you to be nimble and not fuck up, or you will hit rocks, fall where you shouldn’t fall....ie high entrance to Ruby Bowl, where there was some ice and it’s really steep with rocks. These felt very easy to manage in tight steep, sketchy stuff. Maneuverability is high.

    The Protos did not feel as good (to me) at high speed on lower angle bumps, or on groomer runs. The groomers were not that icy today, were pretty soft snow with little piles/bumps everywhere. Don’t know what it was but something was “off”. The Protos wouldn’t lock into a groomer turn. Or let me ski fast in tracked out bumps. I had to watch what I was doing. I had to force the skis to slide/hold in turns (cause they wouldn’t carve). If I aired off a pile of snow they needed input to land them. It was weird. I was confused. I couldn’t just let them run like the R11s do. My buddy’s even asked me why I was so slow (on groomers) today? The Protos just didn’t feel right...not balanced? Maybe I think I need to move the mount back, eg to -7 to 7.5? Which is a shock to me as I always like -6. Haha ya never know.

    Whereas by R11s feel perfect in all conditions. Pow to steeps to groomers to ice. Balanced, fast , quick, strong, agile,. Whatever I’m doing they do it well. And I don’t have to think. The Protos confused me at times.

    I think maybe at Whistler where you have to ski groomers and ice and mank and bumps, even on good days, the R11 would win easily. The R11 is more of an allround ski.

    Will think on the Protos and maybe move them back...to +1cm or +2cm? Haha Right now they’re a quiver ski.. for steep and deep.....stay tuned.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8831.JPG 
Views:	91 
Size:	160.8 KB 
ID:	354357
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_8833.JPG 
Views:	88 
Size:	144.0 KB 
ID:	354358
    Last edited by kc_7777; 12-23-2020 at 12:54 AM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  10. #1085
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    Your weird groomer performance is definitely from them being mounted -6cm or they have a tune issue, re-mount them back 1.5cm and give them a go again, mine have no issues in whistler groomers and bumps at +1cm

  11. #1086
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post
    My last two ski days at Whistler I did one day on my 180cm Rustler 11s (mounted at +1cm = -6.7cm) then today on my new (last years) 180cm Dynastar Menace Protos (mounted at +3cm = -6.1cm). Me 5’7”, 165 lbs.

    One caveat. I’ve had quite a few days on the R11s. They make bad snow skiable. They make me ski better. Everywhere. Only one full day so far on the Protos....today was some windblown fresh, some deeper stuff that was pretty nice...this is the Dynastar thread so here’s my initial thoughts on them.

    Fuck do the Protos turn/pivot?! It seems crazy for a ski with that much camber to be able to pivot like they do. After today all I can say is that Protos really excel (so so easy to turn) in really steep terrain and in untracked pow. Eg we were pretty close to first into Saudan when 7th opened with fresh snow that hadn’t been skied. The Protos loved the steep pitch. Haven’t felt a ski that felt better when you’re mid turn in steep untracked pow, pole pointing downhill for the next turn and you just hold hold hold the turn as the pow blows up over your downhill ski into your face. They have something? And they look f’ing cool. So ya they are magic in steep untouched pow.

    They were also great in sketchy stuff that requires you to . Ie high entrance to Ruby Bowl, some ice and really steep and rocks and you don’t want to fall. These felt very easy to manage in tight sketchy stuff. Maneuverability is high.

    The Protos did not feel as good at high speed on lower angle bumps, packed pow or on groomer runs. The Groomers were not icy today, but were pretty soft snow with little piles/bumps everywhere. Don’t know what it was but something was “off”. The Protos wouldn’t lock into a groomer turn. Or let me ski fast in tracked out bumps. I had to watch what I was doing. I had to force the skis to slide into turns (cause they wouldn’t carve). If I aired off a pile of snow they needed input to land them. It was weird. I was confused. I couldn’t just let them run like the R11s do. My buddy’s even asked me why I was so slow (on groomers) today? The Protos just didn’t feel right...not balanced? Maybe I think I need to move the mount back, eg -7 to 7.5? Which is a shock to me as I always like -6. Haha ya never know.

    Whereas by R11s feel perfect in all conditions. Pow to steeps to groomers to ice. Balanced, fast , quick, strong, agile,. Whatever I’m doing they do it well. And I don’t have to think. The Protos confused me at times.

    I think maybe at Whistler where you have to hit groomers and ice and mank and bumps, even on good days, the R11 wins easily. It’s way more an allround ski.

    Will think on the Protos and maybe move them back...to +1.5 or +2? Right now they’re a quiver ski.. for steep and deep. Not all
    Around. And they are way back in line behind the R11s...stay tuned.
    Your description of a ski that’s super surfy in soft snow yet unstable in hard is almost always due to a “base high” ski and just needs a stone grind to flatten the bases and reset the edges. Base high is the “marbles under your skis” feeling.

    Much more common to have “edge high” bases on new skis where the ski doesn’t like pivot easily. Anytime someone feels the need to “detune” a modern ski, it’s usually edge high and again a stone grind and edge reset would allow them to run a ski sharp tip/tail.

    My Menace 98s, Slicers etc were all edge high and super locked into a turn before stone grinding and my Rustler 9s and a few park skis have base high and felt super unstable and sketchy like your Protos.

  12. #1087
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    It's your mount point and the fact you are on the 180cm, you're really far forward. I skied my 189s 2/3 of the day yesterday and did not feel the same way.

    This ski has a very aggressive tapered tip, pulling the sidecut backwards. Going nearly 4cm forwards of recommended is going to make for some weird hardsnow performance.

  13. #1088
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,854
    I have my 180 protos on the line, I have other skis at -6 or -7 and like that fine but feel the proto at this length probably wouldnt work more than +1 or so for me. The tips are just too soft. I am a directional skier that doesn't mind traditional mount points for what its worth. It is a much easier ski than I anticipated.
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  14. #1089
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,030
    Ya I think my theory that I will always like mounts at -6cm (which is why I went +3cm from -9.1cm recommended) is suspect.

    I'll likely remount back 2cm at +1cm. And maybe a base grind for good measure.

    Thanks!

    KC
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  15. #1090
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post
    Ya I think my theory that I will always like mounts at -6cm (which is why I went +3cm from -9.1cm recommended) is suspect.

    I'll likely remount back 2cm at +1cm. And maybe a base grind for good measure.

    Thanks!

    KC
    A base high ski will still feel unstable still at -12cm and an edge high ski will still be “hard to pivot” still at -3cm.

    Try Stone grinding the bases flat first, reset the edge angles and I’m sure it will be a totally different ski.

    Only change mounts after you’ve re-tuned the ski and still feel the need to(although I doubt you will).

  16. #1091
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    649
    ive got some first gen protos i snagged on covid clearance sitting here with fks to slap on, thinking about mount points after seeing some comments and reviews

    any more feedback from those with more time, difference between first gen and newer enough to change mount?

    for an old school drive the tips skier who loves their xxls and doesnt do flippy spinny shit, whats the consensus, on the line?

  17. #1092
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    Mount them on the line.

    Why does everyone think they need to mount these forward?

    Stop reading blister.

  18. #1093
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane/Schweitzer
    Posts
    6,890
    Quote Originally Posted by The Artist Formerly Known as Leavenworth Skier View Post
    Mount them on the line.

    Why does everyone think they need to mount these forward?

    Stop reading blister.
    Agreed. I always have mounted on the line and have never been disappointed. Too much thinking going on....

  19. #1094
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by The Artist Formerly Known as Leavenworth Skier View Post
    Mount them on the line.

    Why does everyone think they need to mount these forward?

    Stop reading blister.
    🤣🤣🤣 Woody speaks truth!!
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  20. #1095
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,317

    The Dynastar Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldMember View Post
    Agreed. I always have mounted on the line and have never been disappointed. Too much thinking going on....
    Marshal taught me years ago to do +1 with my 24.5 micro boots. Usually when I veer from that and go on the line I wish I was forward a bit, that’s about all the thinking I can handle


    Sent from the Utility Muffin Research Kitchen

  21. #1096
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,754
    24.5??

    Do you fall down a lot?

  22. #1097
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    649
    Quote Originally Posted by The Artist Formerly Known as Leavenworth Skier View Post
    Mount them on the line.

    Why does everyone think they need to mount these forward?

    Stop reading blister.
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldMember View Post
    Agreed. I always have mounted on the line and have never been disappointed. Too much thinking going on....
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    🤣🤣🤣 Woody speaks truth!!
    message received

    im hoping these have the dynastar dna i know and love with a little more playfulness for slow speed casual skiing and friendlier to my knees

  23. #1098
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    Yup, spot on, they have the DNA, they like to go fast like your xxl, just can go sideways fast too, not just straight and fast.

    Don't expect them to be some mellow pow noodle, they are a Dynastar.

  24. #1099
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    Quote Originally Posted by The Artist Formerly Known as Leavenworth Skier View Post
    Mount them on the line.

    Why does everyone think they need to mount these forward?

    Stop reading blister.
    I don’t think I need to and they would ski great on the line, just trying to make the ski feel a little bit more balanced in the air and on take offs. It has a playful shape and basically a twinned tail, but I agree it is stupid and you should probably mount on the line

  25. #1100
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins
    Posts
    803
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    I don’t think I need to and they would ski great on the line, just trying to make the ski feel a little bit more balanced in the air and on take offs. It has a playful shape and basically a twinned tail, but I agree it is stupid and you should probably mount on the line
    I think the argument regarding the mount point on the PROTO/m-free 118 isn't really an argument on the ski. It's a difference in skiing styles. I can understand why some people like it forward (like me) as well as why people like it further back.

    If you're in the air a lot (i.e. richard Permin) then go forward. If not, go rec. Regardless of what you choose, the ski can actually adapt to either. Can't say the same about the prorider, personally; that ski is meant to be on the rec. line, imo. So props to dynastar for making the PROTO as versatile as it is.

    The last thing I'd add about the ski is that it does have a break in period. Don't make too many assumptions about the ski until you get 5+ days on it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •