Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,409

    RE/Mortage/Insurance Mags - flood ? HELP?

    Trying to buy a multi-family as an investment property.

    Interested in a property that is in Probate – catch is its down by the river where vans are parked.

    Trying to get a simple answer – is it in a flood zone? (e.g do I need to buy flood insurance)? Simple question – our agent seems to be useless; selling agent seems to want nothing to do with this property and since its in probate – no one seem to know anything?

    I poked around the town assessors site/GIS site etc - nada. floodsmart dot gov is under construction and maps they refer to I can’t seem to find.

    Emailed my mortgage guy – who says:

    <<Hi Pepperdawg

    Once we get an application, we have a service that determines it’s flood zone status. If it is in a flood zone, all banks require flood insurance that would be escrowed.>>

    All I want is a simple – yes its in a flood zone or no its not.

    So any Mags in the Mortgage/RE/Insurance fields that have access to the needful system.

    (Similar to the carfax requests we see in the padded room all the time.)

    I PM you:

    123 MainStreet
    Anytown USA

    And a neekid pic of wife

    You return:

    Yes - it’s in a klll flood zone 9 -or- no its not.

    Bueller?

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,283
    check with county surveyor's office, they should be the official recorder of the property deed with location.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,829
    Check with insurance company. They will know.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    18,008

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,264
    the local building department likely has this info on the property

    or insurance co is a good thought too

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,409
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Thx DTM - your link lead to this:

    http://fema.maps.arcgis.com/home/web...94072397383025

    Property is in a color labeled "Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x"

    I guess thats good?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,409
    Yeah - don't have an agent (anymore) - they let us buy our primary home/car insurances via the interwebz.

    Some age we live in...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    19,829
    Quote Originally Posted by pepperdawg View Post
    I guess thats good?
    Still depends on how insurance company and lien holder interpret the map.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    18,008
    Yes, Zone X is good, <0.2% annual chance of flooding. Ultimately it's your insurance company/lienholder's call, but it's basically unheard of to require flood coverage in areas designated Zone X. What's the proximity to Zone A/Zone B mapped areas?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,409
    An lsolated pocket of Zone A is about 100 yards away one direction (a small creek/ditch) and the big river (zone AE) is 100 yards away in another direction.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,409
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Inkedflood_17olddepot_LI.jpg 
Views:	30 
Size:	1.90 MB 
ID:	208802

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    2,880
    You should be fine. I think zone x is the 500 year flood if I remember correctly. No lenders will give you a hassle for x.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    18,008
    Zone X is >500-year, which is really <0.2% annual chance. You could have multiple "500-year" floods in a single year. Like I said above, mandatory coverage in Zone X is basically unheard of. That said, I would be curious to know what the elevation differential is between the house and the Zone A/Zone B boundaries given how close they are. Urban expansion and climate change have made some of those FEMA boundaries obsolete. Remember last year's floods in Louisiana? Many areas that were flooded were not within FEMA-designated flood zones, so none of those people had flood insurance and they lost everything. Even if your lender doesn't require it it might be worth investigating how much it would be to add flood coverage. Premiums would probably be pretty low given the Zone X designation. Disregard if there's actually a 30-ft hill there that the air photo doesn't show.

    Signed,

    A guy who lives on the Wasatch Front and doesn't have earthquake coverage (but makes more money now than when he bought the house and is an idiot for not having added it already)
    Last edited by Dantheman; 06-28-2017 at 02:32 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •