Page 67 of 72 FirstFirst ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,675 of 1777

Thread: Climate Change

  1. #1651
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    2 hours from anything
    Posts
    10,771
    Quote Originally Posted by Iwantmy2dollars View Post
    Some of us have been wondering (angry, pissed, astounded) for more than 2 decades. We should all have been rowing the same direction on this a long time ago. And yet just last week - "drill drill drill , day one".... It's pathetic insanity.

    These people smile as they giddily sh-t their own bed (all our beds in reality) and wallow in it. People are amazingly uncaring and selfish. Soon the cost will be untenable. And they will cast blame it on immigrants, Sun spots, sea monsters, anyplace except where it belongs
    It’s wild reading the comments on some of the denier sites. Drroyspencer.com is a good example, lots of educated deniers on that site, it’s not your run of the mill MAGA morons. But they currently have convinced themselves that the warming we are seeing is due to “something else” and the world will start cooling soon. These same people were crowing that the warming had paused from 98-14.

  2. #1652
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,552
    Both. Just waiting for someone in this thread with all the answers and a crystal ball to post links, or a media giant to produce a video.

    Lithium is not the only issue, cobalt mining is another, currently fraught with human rights/ethical complications. Recycling automotive lithium batteries is complex, dangerous, and nuanced. It’s going to be an issue.

  3. #1653
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    7,384
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    Both. Just waiting for someone in this thread with all the answers and a crystal ball to post links, or a media giant to produce a video.

    Lithium is not the only issue, cobalt mining is another, currently fraught with human rights/ethical complications. Recycling automotive lithium batteries is complex, dangerous, and nuanced. It’s going to be an issue.
    There's challenges with any new technology

    You can be part of the problem or solution

    The oil companies are resisting change at all costs. That's why biased media talks like xyz

  4. #1654
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pemberton, BC
    Posts
    2,242
    Quote Originally Posted by k2skier112 View Post
    There's challenges with any new technology

    You can be part of the problem or solution

    The oil companies are resisting change at all costs. That's why biased media talks like xyz
    Of course oil companies are resisting change at all costs. Oil production is their sole mandate. Expecting them to change is like expecting Apple to cancel the iPhone.

  5. #1655
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by xyz View Post
    Of course oil companies are resisting change at all costs. Oil production is their sole mandate. Expecting them to change is like expecting Apple to cancel the iPhone.
    That's ridiculous. When the cigarette execs all publicly denied a link between smoking and cancer, that was what we should expect? These guys have known for decades. They are all criminals, worse than the cigarette guys . They should not be allowed to get away with it

    When it's discovered a product or behavior, is proven to be cause irreparable harm, that knowledge should lead to action. Not - they're making money so don't expect any response.... Especially an existential threat that affects every living thing on earth

  6. #1656
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,552
    Quote Originally Posted by k2skier112 View Post
    There's challenges with any new technology

    You can be part of the problem or solution
    Of course, but discussing and anticipating problems shouldn't be off limits, should it?

  7. #1657
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    2,903
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    Both. Just waiting for someone in this thread with all the answers and a crystal ball to post links, or a media giant to produce a video.

    Lithium is not the only issue, cobalt mining is another, currently fraught with human rights/ethical complications. Recycling automotive lithium batteries is complex, dangerous, and nuanced. It’s going to be an issue.
    There is a new controversy brewing here about new lithium mines in and around the Colorado/Green River: https://www.ksl.com/article/50794124...lp-us-go-green

    might be paywalled?: https://www.sltrib.com/news/environm...-about-go-big/

  8. #1658
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    valley of the heart's delight
    Posts
    2,481
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    Of course, but discussing and anticipating problems shouldn't be off limits, should it?
    Sure. There's this thing I've noticed about anticipated problems. Usually someone was doing research about it 20+ years ago, and there were startups starting 10+ years ago to sell solutions. E.g. I don't know shit about battery recycling, but I stumbled across a story about a small company with truly massive expansion plans, who aims to recover the battery materials. Tesla's also yapped about re-using old batteries in their grid storage division. Seems likely a knowledgeable person would cite more than two examples on the planet. Related, most all the companies building cars are working to reduce costs - that means using less of critical/expensive resources. So, the green mantra is covered - reduce, reuse, recycle.

    As for developing new mineral sources, we happen to have a global, diverse, and efficient economy. I'm confident capital will be appropriately directed to new projects and meet any anticipated demand.

  9. #1659
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    valley of the heart's delight
    Posts
    2,481
    Here's a pretty good video I saw recently about one lithium mining company's prospect (Thacker Pass). She mentions a few other projects, so I feel there must be dozens or hundreds of companies working on lithium projects. Looks like this company has a solid plan to produce a large amount of lithium. Video quality is so-so, content is excellent. Skip ahead at the start 8 or 10 minutes.

  10. #1660
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,552
    Quote Originally Posted by LongShortLong View Post
    Sure. There's this thing I've noticed about anticipated problems. Usually someone was doing research about it 20+ years ago, and there were startups starting 10+ years ago to sell solutions. E.g. I don't know shit about battery recycling, but I stumbled across a story about a small company with truly massive expansion plans, who aims to recover the battery materials. Tesla's also yapped about re-using old batteries in their grid storage division. Seems likely a knowledgeable person would cite more than two examples on the planet. Related, most all the companies building cars are working to reduce costs - that means using less of critical/expensive resources. So, the green mantra is covered - reduce, reuse, recycle.

    As for developing new mineral sources, we happen to have a global, diverse, and efficient economy. I'm confident capital will be appropriately directed to new projects and meet any anticipated demand.
    The little bit I've researched there are challenges as all batteries are proprietary with different construction methods, obviously. So each battery has individual challenges. Obviously humans are advanced enough that we can easily overcome there, but I wonder about cost vs. benefit. Will private companies be able to recycle these batteries, is there a financial incentive? That's the nuance, in my opinion. Perhaps if lithium/cobalt/other materials are $$ enough that will drive the recycling market enough to make it functional.

  11. #1661
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,552
    Quote Originally Posted by muted reborn View Post
    There is a new controversy brewing here about new lithium mines in and around the Colorado/Green River: https://www.ksl.com/article/50794124...lp-us-go-green

    might be paywalled?: https://www.sltrib.com/news/environm...-about-go-big/
    then flushes the lithium free with fresh Colorado River water, according to information Anson CEO Bruce Richardson presented to Utah lawmakers last month. Wastewater will get injected back underground.]
    EV vehicles are the future. But I think most arguments are only against fossil fuels, without consideration given to the potential problems with wide spread EV adoption. Just like "big oil" is dishonest, I have a hard time thinking the mining industry is any more trustworthy. In fact, they have a long track record of being anything but.

    Electric vehicles are hardly a utopian solution. Better than internal combustion, I guess in 50 years we might know the answer.

  12. #1662
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    Of course, but discussing and anticipating problems shouldn't be off limits, should it?
    I read your original response as very dismissive, which is not particularly useful if you really want to discuss issues.

    Perhaps you didn't mean it as such, but that sure is how I read it.

  13. #1663
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    13,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    EV vehicles are the future. But I think most arguments are only against fossil fuels, without consideration given to the potential problems with wide spread EV adoption. Just like "big oil" is dishonest, I have a hard time thinking the mining industry is any more trustworthy. In fact, they have a long track record of being anything but.

    Electric vehicles are hardly a utopian solution. Better than internal combustion, I guess in 50 years we might know the answer.
    I think that mass-transit is the future... it's just a matter of how long it takes the U.S. to realize it.

  14. #1664
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Redwood City
    Posts
    1,762
    Not sure if this has been posted here but apparently the Salton Sea has a shit ton of lithium under it.
    https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles...-rich-domestic

    https://www.politico.com/newsletters...thium-00120466

    Plus you can get at it as a by-product of geothermal energy production.
    I looked into who owns the current production (I wanted to get in on that action!) and Berkshire Hathaway currently owns the majority of the generation (and hence potential extraction) down there. So yeah, some deep pockets there.
    "Great barbecue makes you want to slap your granny up the side of her head." - Southern Saying

  15. #1665
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    13,552
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    I read your original response as very dismissive, which is not particularly useful if you really want to discuss issues.

    Perhaps you didn't mean it as such, but that sure is how I read it.
    It certainly wouldn't be classified as productive, I agree. But I do question the downstream, yet to be realized implications, of wide spread adoption of EV.

  16. #1666
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,580
    It's not like there aren't smart people who have been working on these issues for 10-20+ yrs.

    Active work ongoing to replace cobalt and nickel with manganese and titanium since 2014. Disordered rock salt cathodes now becoming scalable and new techniques reduce energy demands during production.

    New tech from Oakridge Labs funded by DOE that simplifies cost and complexity of Li and Co recovery during battery recycling.

    Sodium and Calcium can replace lithium (prolly not in EV's due to the charge/size ratio advantage of Li+ for compact battery) but as storage capacity at home or at source generation where space in less an issue and due to the cheap cost of both.

    All of these will likely hapen in the next 10 yrs.
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  17. #1667
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    2,903
    Quote Originally Posted by Trackhead View Post
    I have a hard time thinking the mining industry is any more trustworthy. In fact, they have a long track record of being anything but.
    Yeah I don't trust their numbers at all on how much water they will need, which is over 9 billion gallons per year, in a famous basin that obviously doesn't have extra water to give. Their pumping method is unproven tech too.

    Wayne county leased them almost a billion gallons though recently: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/new...hium-project/#

  18. #1668
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pemberton, BC
    Posts
    2,242
    Quote Originally Posted by Iwantmy2dollars View Post
    That's ridiculous. When the cigarette execs all publicly denied a link between smoking and cancer, that was what we should expect? These guys have known for decades. They are all criminals, worse than the cigarette guys . They should not be allowed to get away with it

    When it's discovered a product or behavior, is proven to be cause irreparable harm, that knowledge should lead to action. Not - they're making money so don't expect any response.... Especially an existential threat that affects every living thing on earth
    Again. You can’t expect oil companies to declare themselves criminals, turn themselves in and shut down. They are operating within the current law. It’s up to law makers to make them criminals. So blame your hero Joe Biden, not oil companies.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  19. #1669
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by xyz View Post
    Again. You can’t expect oil companies to declare themselves criminals, turn themselves in and shut down. They are operating within the current law. It’s up to law makers to make them criminals. So blame your hero Joe Biden, not oil companies.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Certainly they don't need to go to jail, but oil companies should make good-sense measures to ablate their carbon footprint and sequester their production more effectively. Not sure why you're always all-in on the all-or-nothing statements when describing this area.

  20. #1670
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pemberton, BC
    Posts
    2,242
    Quote Originally Posted by Garfield3d View Post
    Not sure why you're always all-in on the all-or-nothing statements when describing this area.
    Are you reading what I’m responding to? How can I not be binary?






    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #1671
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Shuswap Highlands
    Posts
    4,358
    With respect to O&G and mining companies, I am with xyz and trackhead here. These companies are about money. Nothing else. They will not sacrifice a dime of their profit for the greater good, no matter the long term cost to the world. And if they do give up cash, it’s to pay off, ..err, lobby, ‘honest’ politicians.

    It’s up to the public to use less of their product and drive investment elsewhere. As long as we continue demand, they will be more than happy to provide and shed not one tear for the future of their progeny let alone ours.

  22. #1672
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Purcell Sud
    Posts
    396

    Climate Change

    Oops post

  23. #1673
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,630
    Quote Originally Posted by xyz View Post
    Of course oil companies are resisting change at all costs. Oil production is their sole mandate. Expecting them to change is like expecting Apple to cancel the iPhone.
    Who gave them this "mandate?" If you are talking about shareholders, does that mean that if people are financially supporting ("investing" so as to make a profit) sex traffickers, the sex traffickers have a mandate to continue?

  24. #1674
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pemberton, BC
    Posts
    2,242
    Quote Originally Posted by WMD View Post
    Who gave them this "mandate?" If you are talking about shareholders, does that mean that if people are financially supporting ("investing" so as to make a profit) sex traffickers, the sex traffickers have a mandate to continue?
    Yes. Shareholders. Of course. The difference here is that oil and gas production is legal and sex trafficking is not.



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #1675
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    1,492
    I am in agreement that mining for minerals for EVs should be heavily monitored and done in as safe a way as possible. What I’m a little confused about why so many people that focus on the issues with resources required for EVs completely ignore the issues related to oil and gas production.

    Between the environmental destruction and social/political issues it’s not like gas is some pristine trouble free resource. The Middle East is a mess because a small group control immense wealth from oil and instead of sharing and bettering their country, they keep their people in poverty and convince them it’s America and Israel why their lives are shit.

    I know it’s Canada but you can’t tell me this is a better alternative. At least include scenes like this and the myriad of oil spills into the conversation.

    Name:  Image1702651459.665303.jpg
Views: 183
Size:  51.4 KBClick image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1702651470.445155.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	525.8 KB 
ID:	479542

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •