Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Do it yourself Fishscale climbing skins/bases, anyone done them ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    JAC
    Posts
    1,314

    Do it yourself Fishscale climbing skins/bases, anyone done them ?

    I'm tired of heavy skins. Has anyone done a DIY fishscale on bases or a minimalist aggressive climbing aid that straps on instead of skins ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    6,041
    Let us know how it goes. There are a bunch of cheap, fat, fishscale skis on STP right now, btw.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Couloirfornia
    Posts
    8,874
    A bunch of write ups on TTips BITD. Alas, gone.

    If I was doing it, I'd try to (carefully) dremel a similar pattern to the Fischer/Atomic negative base pattern on their XCD skis.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernest_Hemingway View Post
    I realize there is not much hope for a bullfighting forum. I understand that most of you would prefer to discuss the ingredients of jacket fabrics than the ingredients of a brave man. I know nothing of the former. But the latter is made of courage, and skill, and grace in the presence of the possibility of death. If someone could make a jacket of those three things it would no doubt be the most popular and prized item in all of your closets.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,790
    this has never been dun, u be the first
    watch out for snakes

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,771
    Before you go fucking up a good pair of skis have you checked out any threads about the use of fish scale skis, where they do and don't work ect ect?
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,135
    This ^^^^. My take away -- the negative pattern is not as good as skis with positive ones, the positive pattern works great for rolling terrain and long approaches (I have the Voile Vector BC's), scales can never replace skins completely, the cheapest (short of DIY) and easiest solution is to buy kicker skins. There are lots of ways to shave weight; dremmeling your skis is near bottom on the saved weight to efficiency ratio matrix.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    VT
    Posts
    273
    Check out this thread for a short video of someone who used a dremel tool to do this.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    I've done several DIY waxless bases, posted pics in this thread. That's a mild stepped base, not very deep, does not affect downhill skiing, works very well on the flats, e.g., crossing a frozen lake (have plans re what to do while waiting for your buds w/skins), little adverse affect on glide. Apples vs. aggressive fishscale oranges (e.g., Voile Vector/Charger BC).

    I did that project with an end mill on a Bridgeport clone. There's a much easier way to do it: Use a Stanley knife to score the ski base with a series of parallel cuts, then use a blunt ended punch to tap down the p-tex behind each score to form a step. The punched p-tex may rebound a bit with time, so it may require repunching from time to time. The big advantage of this method is that no p-tex is removed, instead merely cut and compressed.

    Here's a pic from the other thread. (Note that ski base was scratched up from summer tours before milling.) The Stanley knife + blunt punch method will look a bit different.

    Attachment 117504

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13
    bit off topic but if you are tired of heavy skins take a look on the Contour Hybrid Free skins. It is a split skin without the disadvantages of the classic split skin. The glue and the tip/tail attachement makes the difference. Have been using DIY split skins for years now without any problem but the handling is PITA. Last season on the Hybrids was much better with the same low weight & volume.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Yup, discussion of skins on a fat fishscale thread is definitely off-topic : )

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13
    Still bit relevant if you read his first sentence

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Okay I see that. Skins vs. fishscales is apples vs. oranges.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,135
    True, which is to say don't bother trying to toss out your skins and go fish scales to save weight. The "minimalist aggressive climbing aid that straps on instead of skins" is still a pair skins, unless you remove "aggressive" from the equation.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    On your tic list
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by dschane View Post
    True, which is to say don't bother trying to toss out your skins and go fish scales to save weight. The "minimalist aggressive climbing aid that straps on instead of skins" is still a pair skins, unless you remove "aggressive" from the equation.
    Qft. When my bud and I lap our mtn before the lifts spin, he charges straight up on skins while I tend to have to switchback on steeper pitches on scales. By the time he gets his kit back together for the DH, I'm just arriving. So while total time is often equal, I bet i work harder for it. Which I resent some days for sure.
    Rolling or moderate terrain on trails in the hills however, scales are Mando.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    802
    Quote Originally Posted by wstdeep View Post
    I'm tired of heavy skins. Has anyone done a DIY fishscale on bases or a minimalist aggressive climbing aid that straps on instead of skins ?
    A ski crampon is aggressive and straps on. I have never tried it without skins, but it might work. I am thinking of trying it with my fat fishscales when on a suitable tour with short pitches too steep for scales. Faster off and on than skins. Not sure how much slower they will climb.
    I am expecting good grip and poor glide.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Aspen, Colorado
    Posts
    2,644
    I think crampons are really only good for traverses on hard crusts. Doubly so if there is shallow fresh snow on a crust. If you can keep your base flat to the snow, skins climb better than crampons

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Strong and Free
    Posts
    579
    Fischer Profoil "skins" look like an interesting alternative: basically a removable fish scale pattern.

    http://skimo.co/fischer-profoil-skins

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Eburg
    Posts
    13,239
    Interesting. I tried to DIY removable fishscales 30 years ago, didn't have the tooling to do it. I wonder how well they'll stick while doing downhill turns.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •