Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: crispi xr vs. bd push

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    48

    crispi xr vs. bd push

    Looking to get a new pair of telemark boots. Either the crispi xr or black diamond push for resort skiing. I've seen the reviews for the black diamonds but haven't really heard anything about the crispis!
    Help, opinions, ideas and comments would be appreciated thanks

    Jbultman

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    at work
    Posts
    1,437
    Pm flyoverlandcaptive, as he has skied both. My experiences with the XR, is that it is very stiff out of the box and requires a substantial break in period. Once broken in, the we're great; albeit a bit more "hingey" at the bellows. Flyover loved his push's prior to moving to ntn
    "Not all who wander are lost"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,812
    I really like my Push. Two 100-day work/fun seasons in 'em with zero issues.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    5,968
    I've skied 'em both. The Crispi is indeed hinge-y once broken in. Solid lateral performance, and a nice 'kick' out of turns, but not very smooth flexing. I was having some foot pain problems (unrelated to fit, although I didn't know it then) so I switched to the Push. The fit was excellent, very snug and comfy; it was apparent after the first run that the flex was much, much smoother, and almost as powerful. After a season the softened up a lot, so I switched to Customs, which absolutely ROCKED.

    If you like lots of power, and the fit works, go right to the Custom. If you tour a lot, get the Push. However... the liners don't last very long, and they are cold.

    The XR is much warmer, and has lots of power. However... they take some time to break in, and the flex eventually gets very hinge-y. But if you couple them with a strong binding (HH, Axl) at a high setting, they absolutely kick ass.

    FWIW, I'm in Crispi EVO's now, and LOVE them.

    Edit to add: If BD made an NTN boot, and could figure out better liners, I'd be all over a Custom-style NTN powerhouse...
    Last edited by Flyoverland Captive; 11-07-2013 at 08:33 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyoverland Captive View Post
    I've skied 'em both. The Crispi is indeed hinge-y once broken in. Solid lateral performance, and a nice 'kick' out of turns, but not very smooth flexing. I was having some foot pain problems (unrelated to fit, although I didn't know it then) so I switched to the Push. The fit was excellent, very snug and comfy; it was apparent after the first run that the flex was much, much smoother, and almost as powerful. After a season the softened up a lot, so I switched to Customs, which absolutely ROCKED.

    If you like lots of power, and the fit works, go right to the Custom. If you tour a lot, get the Push. However... the liners don't last very long, and they are cold.

    The XR is much warmer, and has lots of power. However... they take some time to break in, and the flex eventually gets very hinge-y. But if you couple them with a strong binding (HH, Axl) at a high setting, they absolutely kick ass.

    FWIW, I'm in Crispi EVO's now, and LOVE them.

    Edit to add: If BD made an NTN boot, and could figure out better liners, I'd be all over a Custom-style NTN powerhouse...
    Thanks for the comment. What do you guys mean by hing-y?
    I'm coming off garmont syner-gs from 2002 so anything's a improvement. I'm coupling what ever I decide to get with vices and line prophet 90 for a lift served set up and no backcountry... Kinda hard to do in southern Ohio, even though I would love it.

    So your basically saying, it's up to me? I'm just afraid to get something too stiff and be put off. So when I break in the xrs their going to be great but stiff and "hing-y" (whatever that means) and the pushs will be good off the bat but loosen up over time. Hummm.....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    5,968
    Hinge-y means they bend at the bellows, but not much anywhere else. Picture the whole upper part of the boot staying exactly the same as you flex forward; all the motion happens at the bellows.

    With an un-hinge-y boot, the whole thing flexes evenly. Picture your leg pressuring the cuff: The whole boot bends, not just the bellows. It feels much more natural, and much smoother.

    If you're coming from old syner-g's, I'd say get Pushes. They are a powerful boot (not at the level as the Custom or XR, but damn close) and won't require a huge adjustment in your skiing style to get used to. The XR will be a major shock to the system as you try to break them in.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    at work
    Posts
    1,437
    Hingey/ abrupt would be the opposite of a progressive/ smooth flex. Basically, the forward flex is stiff and then it gives way. A progressive/ smooth flexing boot slowly builds or backs off. IMHO, the push would be a better learning boot.
    "Not all who wander are lost"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    at work
    Posts
    1,437
    What he said ^^^^
    "Not all who wander are lost"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyoverland Captive View Post
    Hinge-y means they bend at the bellows, but not much anywhere else. Picture the whole upper part of the boot staying exactly the same as you flex forward; all the motion happens at the bellows.

    With an un-hinge-y boot, the whole thing flexes evenly. Picture your leg pressuring the cuff: The whole boot bends, not just the bellows. It feels much more natural, and much smoother.

    If you're coming from old syner-g's, I'd say get Pushes. They are a powerful boot (not at the level as the Custom or XR, but damn close) and won't require a huge adjustment in your skiing style to get used to. The XR will be a major shock to the system as you try to break them in.
    Ah ha moment... I don't know why that didn't dawn on me before. I should have thought it through..yea I was feeling like the pushs might be the better route.

    Bd push it is...
    Why are the bds cold? And what's your opinion on the boa lacing system/liner? And did they fit true to size?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,812
    I don't find them cold. My wife says she's warmer in hers than any other boot she's ever had.

    Boa works fine for me, but I was dubious at first. Didn't trust a mechanical system that might fail, but they've been reliable. You can get the liners way snugger than with anything else.

    I wear an 11.5-12 US shoe. 28.5 Push.
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    5,968
    I liked the fit of the liners; they just seem thin, and therefore get cold, esp. the toes. They also don't have much insulation on the sole of the foot, which means your footbed is doing most of hte work. BD changed them last year, adding some reflective foil, but I have no idea if it helped. The BOA system was nice, but not really necessary; once you buckle in, any tightness the BOA provided is kinda overwhelmed by the buckles. For touring, I didn't really loosen the buckles much anyway, so it was kinda silly.

    I like a snug boot, so I skied in a 27.5 in both Customs and Pushes. I wear a 10.5-11 street shoe.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,812
    And I really notice the difference between a tight and a loose liner. I can't get a proper fit with a loose liner and tightly buckled shells.
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    5,968
    ^^^ Interesting... I never really noticed that, but maybe it's because it just felt so comfortable.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    At the foot of Arrowwood
    Posts
    1,240
    Any reason you skipped over the T-Race? Very smooth progressive bellow/sole flex with some serious stiffness.
    ????????????????????????

    Kendo Yamamoto "1984"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central OR
    Posts
    5,968
    Can't speak for the OP, but...

    I don't have a Scarpa foot, apparently; I had a pair of T-races for one run, and was in agony. I tried TX Comps when I switched to NTN, but they didn't work either. The arch is too pronounced in the shell, so no amount of baking can get them to fit me.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,812
    I went from T-race to Push because I am so much better than DaHeel. Always wore Scarpa and they fit me well, but the Push fits better.
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    At the foot of Arrowwood
    Posts
    1,240
    Quote Originally Posted by telemike View Post
    I went from T-race to Push because I am so much weaker than DaHeel. Always wanted to ski like DaHeel but the Stiletto fits better.
    Fixed it for ya Mikey!
    Last edited by DaHeel; 11-07-2013 at 10:50 PM.
    ????????????????????????

    Kendo Yamamoto "1984"

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by DaHeel View Post
    Any reason you skipped over the T-Race? Very smooth progressive bellow/sole flex with some serious stiffness.
    Yea just as flyoverlandcaptive said I don't have the foot for the t-race, let alone scarpa. The t1s are tight. so... Yea that's why, I "skipped" over them. I heard they are great boots though!!!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by DaHeel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by telemike View Post
    I went from T-race to Push because I am so much better than DaHeel. Always wore Scarpa and they fit me well, but the Stilettofits better.
    Fixed it for ya Mikey!
    +1 hahaha

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •