Originally Posted by cmsummit
Is this possible? I mean seriously. my parents saw this on dateline and I call bull shit. what is the highest recorded windspeed? 230mph at Mt. Washington?
Originally Posted by cmsummit
Is this possible? I mean seriously. my parents saw this on dateline and I call bull shit. what is the highest recorded windspeed? 230mph at Mt. Washington?
"The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" --Margaret Thatcher
it would be hard for anyone who didnt know better to known what was going on untill they saw the water coming at them.. and at that point you dont have time to do anything but stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye.... so sad..
anybody know of organizations that support anyone who wants to go over and do volunteer work?? ive been looking into it to go help clean beaches and rebuild houses over this summer but its hard to find organizations that do this...
CHECK OUT THIS VID (click on 61mb or 38mb windowsmedia link)
crazy pic..\/\/
(edited out): my bad lane
Last edited by hucksquaw; 02-28-2005 at 11:10 AM.
Mom! The meatloaf! FUCK!.
When a wave is in deep water no water is actually moving. The wave is just energy moving through the water so it can travel very fast. It's just like a wave moving though a rope. When the wave get's close to shore the front of it runs aground causing it to slow down while the tail end is still traveling faster. This is what causes a wave to "break" and start actually moving water.Originally Posted by mr_gyptian
I saw that on the news last night. Their 3 adult kids were down there with them but not clear if they were right with them that morning. They all lived.
I know the images from movies are big curling breakers as opposed to surges. Those shots look more like the breaker than I would have expected.
I knew of tsunamis and have been chased off the water by the threat of one. I never knew about the water running out beforehand until just a couple of months before the asian one. I saw a show on Discovery about one in 1929 where the cove went dry before the wave rushed in.
I don't know if I would have figured it out right away but I have to think my spidey senses would have kept me from going closer. Maybe still a deer in the headlights I suppose.
It's not so much the model year, it's the high mileage or meterage to keep the youth of Canada happy
Originally Posted by Lurch
Pretty close. Actually with regular waves, each water molecule makes a little circular path (that's how they transmit the wave energy to the next molecule), so they do move fractionally (but they end up pretty close to where they started). As you go deeper under the wave, the little orbital path is smaller and smaller. Thats why the water is calm when you scuba under waves.
Seismic or lanslide (Tsunami type) waves are very different in that the water molecules are moving all the way to the bottom of the ocean.
This is why they can be imperceptible on a boat in very deep water, and why they jack up so high and have so much mass once they hit shallower water.
As for regular waves breaking, it is more accurate to say the deeper water molecules slow down when they feel bottom and the surface molecules are travelling faster, so the top of the wave pitches and breaks.
The bottom (not front) runs aground and the top (not tail) moves faster.
Last edited by ScottG; 02-25-2005 at 10:01 AM.
Simple physics. The more dense a material is, the faster waves can propagate though that medium. Regular ocean waves are caused by the transfer of energy from a slow medium (air) and a faster one (water) so they don't travel as fast. Tsunamis are caused by the transfer of energy from a real fast medium (ground) and a slower one (water) so they travel way faster.Originally Posted by mr_gyptian
"Great barbecue makes you want to slap your granny up the side of her head." - Southern Saying
call me stupid but are those people smiling? they actually look they are laughing, perhaps not knowing they are about to die?Originally Posted by hucksquaw
Last edited by MacDaddy; 02-25-2005 at 10:40 AM.
Points on their own sitting way up high
False. River wave in China used as Tsunami-stand inOriginally Posted by hucksquaw
Not your fault, Huck, but it really bugs me when people use photoshop to make false images of terrible natural disatsers that claimed so many innocent lives. Please edit that picture out so the fallacy is not perpetuated.
And Mr. G - that speed data is entirely true according to the many peer-reviewed papers I've read on the subject (at least in open water - the "breaking" or surging waves on the beaches probably travel at luch lesser speeds than 200 mph due to the toe of the wave dragging on the shallows for several kilmometers). Overall, though, water is a much denser medium than air, thereby able to transmit energetic waveforms generated from sudden vertical uplift of the seafloor (from the earthquake) at such high velocities.
When I was working for the Research Corp. of the Univ. of Hawai`i last winter on the Big Island, some of my co-workers were involved in a publc-safety effort to create videos shown on cable access and in local schools to try and dissuade surfers from attemtping to surf tsunami waves, because, we you can see from the original pics in this thread, it is impossible to do so. Thanks Hollywood!! MORONS.
I'll second that. Where I lived in SoCal the low, low tides would suck the water out like a hundred yards and you could run around in the same location you would catch waves during high tide. I could imagine beaches elsewhere going through even more drastic changes at low tide, especially if the beach had a real slight incline (ie. some beaches you can walk out 200 yards and be only waist deep). So, if I was vacationing in Thailand, or wherever that was, it would strike me as a very drastic tide, but I don't think I would've thought to be alarmed. Now I know better.Originally Posted by Samwich
ROBOTS ARE EATING MY FACE.
I'm guessing that pic is fake.Originally Posted by MacDaddy
It is. See three posts up.Originally Posted by jayfrizzo
www.snopes.com
god bless that site.
too many folks regurgitate and forward internet shit that aint half believable.
Couldn't agree more. I got the "deep sea creatures washed up from Tsunami" mail today (also on Snopes' tsunami page). Fucking morons. Wrong fucking ocean, even.
well i'm glad to know that these two have, in fact, become real friends.
![]()
Actually, density isn't as big a factor as elasticity. And higher density actually slows a waves propagation. However in most cases the increased elasticity (elastic modulus) of a higher density medium results in faster wave speeds.Originally Posted by LegoSkier
"if the city is visibly one of humankind's greatest achievements, its uncontrolled evolution also can lead to desecration of both nature and the human spirit."
-- Melvin G. Marcus 1979
Originally Posted by mattitude
Died in tsunami, indeed.
...about two seconds after that last pic.
How do you figure? My understanding is that if a wave is transmitted from a low density medium to a high density medium, the wave speed always speeds up. A high density, low elasticity medium like solid granite propagates waves far faster then a high density, higher elasticity material like rubber or the earth's mantle.Originally Posted by Telenater
Does anyone have any equations? Any physics students out there?
Bookmarks