Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Have bikes changed a lot since 2006?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,821

    Have bikes changed a lot since 2006?

    I'm on the search for a 6" travel bike, and I'm wondering what's the oldest I should go (assuming good condition).

    I'm checking out a 2006 Rocky Mountain Slayer that seems to be in nice condition, but I'm wondering if the design is on the old side at this point. What has changed in the past few years, and how far back do you go before designs are obsolete?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,702
    How long do you want to have this bike?
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,821
    I'm thinking a couple years. I'm getting back into mountain biking after an 8 year hiatus. I rented a 2011 RM Slayer on the weekend and was absolutely blown away by how far things have come since my '01 Big Hit. It made my old bike feel like a crappy sofa bed spring mattress. The Slayer was so much more comfortable and the suspension was leagues better. I want my new bike to feel more like the Slayer I rented and less like my old Big Hit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in transit
    Posts
    1,065
    You can still find some good bikes from 2006. If you can find a good deal on an iron horse 6point, I would go that way. The thing is thru-axle rear, 44mm headtube and dw link. My friend threw a 8.5 x2.5 shock in his, lowering the bottom bracket to 13.5 and giving it a 67 head angle.....says it absolutely pins.

    I have a 2008 remedy, and I think it is still one of the best all mountain bikes available. The new trek slash? It's really, really similar to the first generation remedy. I've been riding mine hard for years now and it's holding up great.

    the 2006 spec. enduro (back when the enduro/sx trail were the same frame) is a burly rig that can take some abuse. Still a great bike, and with some geometry tweaks can be brought right in line with the new stuff.

    A friend has my old Heckler from 2006, and that is still a killer short travel all mountain bike today.

    so yeah, lots of good stuff from 2006ish, but I wouldn't go much older. I would also stick to popular bikes so there is good aftermarket support. Simple bikes with single pivots, like the heckler, make new bearings easy and breath life into the frame again.

    Oh. forgot about the prophet MX. It is a springy, flexy bike, but if you are into that, it is snappy and fun. Very current geometry on it, and a super easy to service single pivot, along with a rear thru-axle.
    Quote Originally Posted by 3centshort View Post
    I figure when he realized he was still 10-15 feet off as he flew the K his asshole puckered so hard it ate his nuts
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    In the other scenario, you would be like "Peanut Butter, cool, fuck I'm stuck HELP ME HELP ME HELP ME HELP ME oh fuck I'm screwed, but at least I have time to think about how screwed I am. I guess that is a blessing. FUCK NO IT'S NOT A BLESSSING I'M STUCK AND I'M DYING.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    Quote Originally Posted by D(C) View Post
    I'm on the search for a 6" travel bike, and I'm wondering what's the oldest I should go (assuming good condition).

    I'm checking out a 2006 Rocky Mountain Slayer that seems to be in nice condition, but I'm wondering if the design is on the old side at this point. What has changed in the past few years, and how far back do you go before designs are obsolete?
    2006 slayer will be all-in-all legit.

    the big ticket items to really inspect and make sure are not hammered, and are fully functioning are:

    brakes
    fork
    rear shock
    wheelset
    tires
    cassette/chain

    all that stuff is readily replaceable and will still be current, so you can use new or used stuff to upgrade or whatever.

    however, if all that stuff needs to be replaced within a year, you might as well buy a new bike.
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    7,034
    ^^^^This, but also keep in mind that '06 Slayer won't climb like the new one. It's a capable descender though if you don't mind taking your time to the top.
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, flying through the air

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    394
    You should be able to find an 06-08 Reign for under $1k. I took my buddy's 06 for a ride the other day and was really surprised how good it felt. It would definitely be a better climber than a Slayer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    7,034
    Second the Reign. Incredible value in Giant bikes, and easy to find cheap parts.
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, flying through the air

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,754
    Some of the new bikes look pretty nice and seem to be considerably cheaper than what you would have paid in 2006 for a comparable bike ... I would look long and hard to see if you are really saving much money over a 7 yr old bike ?

    Last yr my tenant bought a specialized for 2200$ that I would have expected to list for 3200$ in 2006

    They had zero popularity in Canada but isnt the iron horse brand tits up, what if you need bushings or something ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    4,318
    Conundrum was selling a 2010 (new) Spec. Pitch Comp for what was in your price range. I'm not sure if he's still got it - but defintely worth a look.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    is the slayer a 30, 50, 70 or 90?
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,821
    Quote Originally Posted by marshalolson View Post
    is the slayer a 30, 50, 70 or 90?
    It's the 90 but it was bought brand new in '08 as frame only and built up with '08 parts (by a shop, so he says). Build is X9, '08 Marzocchi 55 fork (not sure on the exact model), Fox RP23 shock, Mavic Crossmax wheels. He's asking a hair under a grand.

    Here's the pic, taken from the CL ad:


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    812
    Quote Originally Posted by D(C) View Post
    ...I rented a 2011 RM Slayer on the weekend and was absolutely blown away by how far things have come since my '01 Big Hit. ...
    My frame of reference for what a mountain bike should feel like was a '92 or 3 Miyata. It's taken me a while to realize just how much the sport has changed. After spending a month fantasizing about a full on carbon Epic or Tallboy, I decided to go with a mid-range build Santa Cruz Superlight, because it seemed like the best value. This full suspension beast is about 6 lbs. (!) lighter then my steel hardtail.

    Hopefully the forests don't burn down before she gets here, I'm getting impatient!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    My buddy ended up buying that Pitch awhile ago. What about that Reign that was on here for $1,300? If you could up your budget a little, that thing is tittyballs for the price.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Conundrum View Post
    My buddy ended up buying that Pitch awhile ago. What about that Reign that was on here for $1,300? If you could up your budget a little, that thing is tittyballs for the price.
    JeffreyJim's Reign is sweet but it's a large, and I'm more a of a medium kind of guy based on being 5'8".

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,835
    That Slayer is a cool bike, but the frame is much more oriented towards downhill bombing than all around riding / significant climbing. It's also kind of weird to have Crossmax's on a bike like that.

    Unless you're in a big rush to have a bike really soon, I'd keep looking. There are plenty of bikes out there will fit your criteria / budget that are better all-arounders (assuming you're looking for a do-everything sort of bike).

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bozeman
    Posts
    1,503
    Quote Originally Posted by D(C) View Post
    It's the 90 but it was bought brand new in '08 as frame only and built up with '08 parts (by a shop, so he says). Build is X9, '08 Marzocchi 55 fork (not sure on the exact model), Fox RP23 shock, Mavic Crossmax wheels. He's asking a hair under a grand.
    FWIW, I thought that suspension design pedaled like shit (but at least it's heavy). You'll notice that the current slayers don't have that design.
    We heard you in our twilight caves, one hundred fathom deep below, for notes of joy can pierce the waves, that drown each sound of war and woe.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,125
    did Lee's medium endorphin get sold?
    "A man on foot, on horseback or on a bicycle will see more, feel more, enjoy more in one mile than the motorized tourists can in a hundred miles."
    — Edward Abbey (Desert Solitaire)

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    looks like the fork is an 08 55 tst2... which would likely be problematic to be honest. that production year was a nightmare for marzocchi, specifically on that exact model.

    the rear shock looks to be a 2006, and i can tell you rear shock technology has evolved a ton since 2006. i am sure the rear shock is fine and all, but since you asked, suspension has seen the largest improvements over the past few years of any bike component.

    finally, those wheels are likely crossmax xl's more like 2006 or older. plenty fine wheels for trail riding, assuming they are true and well maintained... just probably not from 2008. maybe purchased in 2008 with the rest of the build.





    not sure your budget, but leelau's endorphin is a really really really sick bike. just FWIW.
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,821
    Thanks all for your honest and helpful advice. I decided against the Slayer.

    Instead, I spent a little bit more and am the proud new owner of a 2011 Giant Reign 2!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    394
    Congratulations! You will not be disappointed.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    7,034
    Sick!
    0987
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, flying through the air

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Posts
    1,638
    as a fairly new owner of an '09 Reign, I say... good choice!

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Stowe
    Posts
    4,432

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    3,821
    I took my Reign for its inaugural ride this evening and I am STOKED! (I was away this past weekend so sadly I had to patiently wait to take her for a spin). The climbing performance is absolutely incredible for a bike that descends that well. For North Shore stuff, I definitely don't need more bike. Compared to the Slayer I had rented, the uphill performance is much, much better with very similar prowess on the way down. I'm really, really happy with my purchase so far.

    Also, after an 8 year hiatus from mountain biking, I'm back pretty much right where I left off! Feels good.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •