Page 256 of 275 FirstFirst ... 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 ... LastLast
Results 6,376 to 6,400 of 6863
  1. #6376
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    1,279
    Quote Originally Posted by ezgzy View Post
    I have begun the journey of mounting my own fucking skis and have a question about how many mounts is acceptable… these black ops 118s are cooked and have 3 mounts but are currently too far forward for my tastes. Two of the mounts are forward of the line while the current mount is on the line, i want to move them back a bit by reusing the rear two mount holes for the toe and pulling the heel back the appropriate distance. First picture is the current situation, second picture is about where i would be putting new holes. I know the conventional wisdom is 3 mounts but some people mount 4-5 times or more, so my question is whether this is a good idea or not. My new holes would have significant clearance from all of the current ones, and i could use inserts if that would help. Ski does not have metal but it has an abs mount plate and it’s a poplar core. First two sets of holes filled with plugs, i could dowel and epoxy the current holes though. Will my skis snap in half? Please enlighten me.
    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    You'll probably get a huge range of opinions - but I'll give mine...
    I've had several pairs of skis where the previous mounts interfered with the desired mount holes. (Like the holes actually touched.)
    (I haven't had one, that I recall with 3+ mounts on it, but I'm not sure that matters a ton. But I say this in the spirit of full disclosure.)

    All the skis I have experience doing this with were all very burly skis - most with two sheets of metal.

    I have simply moved, in all cases, interference or not, to plugging old holes with bamboo skewers and epoxy. (And a little more on top to seal the plugs, BTW)
    Then I simply mount wherever I desire. In a few cases, the new holes touch the old ones, and I've never had a mount rip out.

    IMO, if you fill the holes, and use epoxy, I think the core is likely to be very nearly as strong as before.

    (Or you might die, I dunno...)

    [Edited to add: So, to be clear, if it were me, I'd pull all those plastic plugs, (drill the centers out with a small drill, insert a small #4 or so screw, and yank with a hammer nail-puller) then plug them with skewers and epoxy, and mount where you want. If it made me a little more comfortable, I might adjust forward/backward mount a little to add more separation.]

    My minimal-worth $0.02.

    -Greg

  2. #6377
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    31,129
    You might have to use some FG & slowset in the screw holes, so you want a cm between holes, IME you can usually re-use screw holes just pull the plugs out with a drywall screw

    what is bad/ worse is overlapping holes which lots of people do but i wouldn't

    again you want 1 cm between holes

    edit: no point in pulling all the plugs, i think once you have cut the core with a drill you don't get the strength back with a piece of dowel
    Last edited by XXX-er; 11-12-2023 at 11:54 AM.
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  3. #6378
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    2,962
    No need to pull all those plugs and fill with wood and epoxy. Sure they’d be stronger, but it’s unnecessary if the mount point in the second picture works for you. Mount them and ski them.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums

  4. #6379
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,697
    Quote Originally Posted by ezgzy View Post
    I have begun the journey of mounting my own fucking skis and have a question about how many mounts is acceptable… these black ops 118s are cooked and have 3 mounts but are currently too far forward for my tastes. Two of the mounts are forward of the line while the current mount is on the line, i want to move them back a bit by reusing the rear two mount holes for the toe and pulling the heel back the appropriate distance. First picture is the current situation, second picture is about where i would be putting new holes. I know the conventional wisdom is 3 mounts but some people mount 4-5 times or more, so my question is whether this is a good idea or not. My new holes would have significant clearance from all of the current ones, and i could use inserts if that would help. Ski does not have metal but it has an abs mount plate and it’s a poplar core. First two sets of holes filled with plugs, i could dowel and epoxy the current holes though. Will my skis snap in half? Please enlighten me.

    Attachment 475867
    Attachment 475868


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I agree with others that based solely on hole spacing I think you will be fine...

    BUT...

    It looks like you might try to re-use old pivot toepiece rear holes as front holes? They are not the same... that will not work.

    Also... it looks like you are going -3 to 4cm? That is a lot in my opinion and I'd suggest if the mount point needs to be that much further back that maybe this is the wrong ski.

    Just some thoughts...

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  5. #6380
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Boise
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    I agree with others that based solely on hole spacing I think you will be fine...

    BUT...

    It looks like you might try to re-use old pivot toepiece rear holes as front holes? They are not the same... that will not work.

    Also... it looks like you are going -3 to 4cm? That is a lot in my opinion and I'd suggest if the mount point needs to be that much further back that maybe this is the wrong ski.

    Just some thoughts...

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    I don’t think the open holes are pivots, look like maybe royals in which case I think reusing the prev rear screws as new front screws would work


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #6381
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Fernie and/or Smithers
    Posts
    1,488
    You’re god to go, that new mount looks bomber (assuming the holes you are reusing are actually the correct spacing).

    I once skied on skis with 47 holes in each ski. I’m still alive.

  7. #6382
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    675
    Anyone ever use one of these to find the centerline on a ski?
    https://www.saltcitysteel.org/shop/p...-center-master
    Looks pretty good.

  8. #6383
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    I agree with others that based solely on hole spacing I think you will be fine...

    BUT...

    It looks like you might try to re-use old pivot toepiece rear holes as front holes? They are not the same... that will not work.

    Also... it looks like you are going -3 to 4cm? That is a lot in my opinion and I'd suggest if the mount point needs to be that much further back that maybe this is the wrong ski.

    Just some thoughts...

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Would be going about -3, which i think will work on these given recommended is only -2.6 from true center. Blister liked them as far back as -6 from center so i think they’ll be fine.

    And the current open holes are royals, the rest are pivots though.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #6384
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Boise
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by turnfarmer View Post
    Anyone ever use one of these to find the centerline on a ski?
    https://www.saltcitysteel.org/shop/p...-center-master
    Looks pretty good.
    Love me analog engineering widgets but I'm not sure I see the advantage to one of these relative to one of the slidewright centering tools. I think this would be good at finding center line relative to the edges of the topsheet, but that's an inexact science especially with rolled edges or semi cap. Might as well use the folded paper strip trick at that point. If the points of the outside pickets extended down so that you could center between the ski edges you'd have something.

  10. #6385
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,697
    Quote Originally Posted by ezgzy View Post
    Would be going about -3, which i think will work on these given recommended is only -2.6 from true center. Blister liked them as far back as -6 from center so i think they’ll be fine.

    And the current open holes are royals, the rest are pivots though.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Right on... mount em up and rip.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  11. #6386
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Encinitas CA
    Posts
    278
    My 12 year old mounted up his new GPO’s tonight







    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #6387
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,199
    That's a pretty sick set up for that young guy. Good job!!

  13. #6388
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    538
    After reading the last 20 pages, its not clear to me what the preferred glue/epoxy is for a fresh pivot mount (roo/SVST/GG have all been referenced). Please point me in the right direction, thanks!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  14. #6389
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    20,264
    Quote Originally Posted by zlatham View Post
    After reading the last 20 pages, its not clear to me what the preferred glue/epoxy is for a fresh pivot mount (roo/SVST/GG have all been referenced). Please point me in the right direction, thanks!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Use one of them, not all of them

  15. #6390
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Fernie and/or Smithers
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by zlatham View Post
    its not clear to me what the preferred glue/epoxy is
    I recommend less thinking and more skiing.

  16. #6391
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Posts
    153
    Ready for it!!!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20231112_212636.jpg 
Views:	85 
Size:	1.40 MB 
ID:	476223

  17. #6392
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    On another tangent.
    Posts
    3,855
    Quote Originally Posted by nickbokhoven View Post
    My 12 year old mounted up his new GPO’s tonight







    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    That's great! It reminds me of these words of wisdom:

    Name:  teach_child_to_ski.png
Views: 344
Size:  512.3 KB
    Best regards, Terry
    (Direct Contact is best vs PMs)

    SlideWright.com
    Ski, Snowboard & Tools, Wax and Wares
    Repair, Waxing, Tuning, Mounting Tips & more
    Add TGR handle to notes & paste 5% TGR Discount code during checkout: 1121TGR

  18. #6393
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Encinitas CA
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpinord View Post
    That's great! It reminds me of these words of wisdom:

    Name:  teach_child_to_ski.png
Views: 344
Size:  512.3 KB
    Lol

    He is well on his way


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  19. #6394
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,945
    Quote Originally Posted by zlatham View Post
    After reading the last 20 pages, its not clear to me what the preferred glue/epoxy is for a fresh pivot mount (roo/SVST/GG have all been referenced). Please point me in the right direction, thanks!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I say flexseal. Ive never heard of anyone doing it but im 99% sure it would work well. the glue is mostly just for water intrusion... it shouldnt provide much pullout strength.

  20. #6395
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,199
    Quote Originally Posted by zlatham View Post
    After reading the last 20 pages, its not clear to me what the preferred glue/epoxy is for a fresh pivot mount (roo/SVST/GG have all been referenced). Please point me in the right direction, thanks!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

    SVST glue and if epoxy Hardman orange label 72 hour

  21. #6396
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Maple Falls, WA
    Posts
    629
    SVST for me on a fresh mount. It is suspiciously similar to Titebond III, except I pay more for a tiny bottle once every year and a half.

    Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  22. #6397
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    5,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Brasso View Post
    SVST for me on a fresh mount. It is suspiciously similar to Titebond III, except I pay more for a tiny bottle once every year and a half.

    Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
    Seems like a good guess, since if you go to their website here:

    http://690685.shop.netsuite.com/s.nl...33&category=78

    And click the link for the SDS, you get this:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C789CA1E-847F-4A86-991A-31551B6AEF4C.jpeg 
Views:	114 
Size:	728.3 KB 
ID:	476284

    Though maybe Titebond II? That’s what they call their ‘premium’ wood glue. Titebond III is ‘ultimate’.

    Edit:

    I think it‘s Titebond II. The SVST SDS says it has aluminum chloride. There’s a warning on the Titebond website about aluminum chloride on the Titebond II page, but not the Titebond III page.

  23. #6398
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    59715
    Posts
    7,507
    Clear 'rilla

  24. #6399
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    15,868

  25. #6400
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,614
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    Seems like a good guess, since if you go to their website here:

    http://690685.shop.netsuite.com/s.nl...33&category=78

    And click the link for the SDS, you get this:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C789CA1E-847F-4A86-991A-31551B6AEF4C.jpeg 
Views:	114 
Size:	728.3 KB 
ID:	476284

    Though maybe Titebond II? That’s what they call their ‘premium’ wood glue. Titebond III is ‘ultimate’.

    Edit:

    I think it‘s Titebond II. The SVST SDS says it has aluminum chloride. There’s a warning on the Titebond website about aluminum chloride on the Titebond II page, but not the Titebond III page.
    Nice catch. If it is not the exact same it is extremely similar. Titebond II is just about as water resistant as III, the biggest difference is exposure to hot water and working time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •